WEST BANCORPORATION, INC.

1601 22^nd Street

West Des Moines, IAIowa 50266

PROXY STATEMENT

~~2010~~2013 ANNUAL MEETING OF ~~SHAREHOLDERS~~STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on April ~~29, 2010~~25, 2013

~~INTRODUCTION~~

This proxy statement isand the accompanying proxy card are being furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors (the "Board") of West Bancorporation, Inc. (the ~~“Board” and the “Company”~~"Company") of proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting of ~~Shareholders (“Annual Meeting”~~Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting"). The meeting will be held in the David L. Miller Conference Center at the ~~Company’s~~Company's headquarters, 1601 22^nd Street, West Des Moines, Iowa, on April ~~29, 2010,~~25, 2013, at 4:00 p.m. Central Time, and at any and all adjournments thereof. A copy of the ~~Company’s 2009~~Company's 2012 summary annual report to ~~shareholders~~stockholders and ~~appendix to the proxy statement~~Form 10-K containing the annual report to ~~shareholders,~~stockholders, including our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, accompany this proxy statement. This proxy statement, ~~f orm~~form of proxy, and other accompanying materials are first being mailed to ~~Shareholders~~stockholders on or about March ~~15, 2010.~~6, 2013.

~~Only shareholders of record at the close of business~~QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

What is a proxy?

A proxy is a document, also referred to as a "proxy card," on ~~March 1, 2010, (“Shareholders” or “Shareholder”) are entitled to notice of and~~which you authorize someone else to vote atfor you in the way that you want to vote. The proxy holders will vote your shares as you have instructed, thereby ensuring your shares will be voted whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting. You may also choose to abstain from voting.

What is a proxy statement?

A proxy statement is a document required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") that, among other things, explains the items on which you are asked to vote on the proxy card.

Why am I receiving this proxy statement and proxy card?

You are receiving a proxy statement and proxy card from us because on February 21, 2013, the record date for the Annual Meeting, you owned shares of Company common stock. There were 17,403,882 shares of the Company's common stock outstanding at the close of business on that date, all of which are eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting. ~~Shareholders are entitled to one vote per share outstanding in their names on~~This proxy statement describes the ~~record date on all~~ matters that ~~properly come before~~will be presented for consideration by the ~~meeting. A quorum is necessary to conduct business~~stockholders at the Annual Meeting. It also gives you information concerning those matters to assist you in making an informed decision on each matter.

When you sign the enclosed proxy card or otherwise vote pursuant to the instructions set forth in the proxy card, you appoint the proxy holders designated on the proxy card as your representatives at the meeting. The proxy holders will vote your shares as you have instructed, thereby ensuring your shares will be voted whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we ask that you instruct the proxies how to vote your shares in advance of the meeting just in case your plans change.

If you sign and return the proxy card and an issue comes up for a vote at the Annual Meeting that is not identified on the card, the proxy holders will vote your shares, pursuant to your proxy, in accordance with their judgment.

What if I receive more than one proxy card?

You will receive more than one proxy card if you have multiple holdings reflected in our stock transfer records and/or in accounts with brokers. Please sign and return ALL proxy cards to ensure that all your shares are voted.

What matters will be voted on at the meeting?

You are being asked to vote on the following matters proposed by our Board of Directors: (i) the election of 14 directors, (ii) the non-binding vote on the 2012 compensation of the named executive officers, and (iii) a vote on ratification of McGladrey LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2013 fiscal year.

These matters are more fully described in this proxy statement. We are not aware of any other matters that will be voted on at the Annual Meeting. However, if any other business properly comes before the meeting, the persons named as proxies for stockholders will vote on such matters in a manner they consider appropriate.

How do I vote?

After reviewing this document, please submit your proxy using any of the voting methods indicated on the proxy card. By submitting your proxy, you authorize the individuals named in it to represent you and vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions. Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please submit your proxy card promptly in the enclosed envelope or through the internet, email, or fax by following the instructions on the proxy card.

If you sign and return your proxy card but do not mark the card to provide voting instructions, the shares represented by your proxy card will be voted "FOR" all 14 nominees named in this proxy statement, "FOR" the say-on-pay proposal, and "FOR" the ratification of the appointment of McGladrey LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2013 fiscal year.

If you are a beneficial owner and a broker or other fiduciary is the record holder of your shares (which is usually referred to as "street name" ownership), then you received this proxy statement from the record holder of the shares that you beneficially own. The record holder should have given you instructions for directing how the record holder should vote your shares. It will then be the record holder's responsibility to vote your shares in the manner you direct.

If you want to vote in person, please come to the meeting. We will distribute ballots to anyone who wants to vote at the meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held in the name of a broker or other fiduciary (i.e. street name), you will need to arrange to obtain a legal proxy from the record holder in order to vote in person at the meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we ask that you complete and return your proxy card or vote via the internet, email, or fax in advance of the Annual Meeting in case your plans change.

If I hold shares in the name of a broker, who votes my shares?

Under the rules of various national and regional securities exchanges, brokers and other fiduciaries that hold securities on behalf of beneficial owners generally may vote on routine matters even if they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owners for whom they hold securities, but they are not permitted to vote on non-routine matters unless they have received voting instructions from you. The ratification of the appointment of an issuer's independent registered public accounting firm is considered a routine matter, while the election of directors and say-on-pay proposals are both considered non-routine matters. Thus, if you do not provide instructions to your broker as to how it should vote the shares beneficially owned by you, your broker will be able to vote on the ratification of the appointment of McGladrey LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm but generally will not be permitted to vote on the election of directors or say-on-pay proposal. If your broker does not receive instructions from you on how to vote on a particular matter on which your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote, your broker will return the proxy to us indicating the broker does not have authority to vote on these matters. This is generally referred to as a "broker non-vote" and will affect the outcome of the voting as described below under "What options do I have in voting on each of the proposals?" Therefore, we encourage you to provide directions to your broker as to how you want your shares voted on all matters brought before the Annual Meeting.

If I hold shares in the West Bancorporation Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan, who votes my shares?

If you are a holder of stock in the Company's Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan (the "Plan"), you can direct the Trustee of the Plan how to vote the number of shares you hold in the Plan for each proposal included in this proxy statement. If you do not provide timely voting directions to the Trustee, then the Trustee shall vote the shares held for your benefit in the same proportion as those shares of stock held in the Plan for which the Trustee has received proper directions for voting.

What if I change my mind after I return my proxy?

If you hold your shares in your own name, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls close at the meeting. You may do this by:

signing another proxy card with a later date and returning that proxy card to ist Shareholder Services, 433 S. Carlton Ave., Wheaton, Illinois 60187;

timely submitting another proxy via the internet, email, or fax, if that is the method you originally used to submit your proxy;

sending notice to us at the address below that you are revoking your proxy; or

voting in person at the meeting.

All written notices of revocation and other written communications with respect to revocation of proxies should be sent to West Bancorporation, Inc., 1601 22nd Street, West Des Moines, Iowa 50266, Attention: Corporate Secretary. If you hold your shares in the name of your broker and desire to revoke your proxy, you will need to contact your broker.

How many votes do we need to hold the Annual Meeting?

A majority of the shares that are outstanding ~~shares~~and entitled to vote as of the ~~corporation, represented~~record date must be present in person or by proxy ~~shall constitute a quorum.~~at the meeting in order to hold the meeting and conduct business. Shares are counted as present at the meeting if the stockholder either:

is present and votes in person at the meeting; or

has properly submitted a signed proxy card or other form of proxy (through the internet, email, or fax).

On February 21, 2013, the record date, there were 17,403,882 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Therefore, at least 8,701,942 shares need to be present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting.

What happens if a nominee is unable to stand for re-election?

The ~~three proposals described in this proxy statement are~~board of directors may, by resolution, provide for a lesser number of directors or designate a substitute nominee. In the ~~election of 14 directors,~~latter case, shares represented by proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee at the ~~non-binding vote on 2009 executive compensation, and a vote on ratification~~discretion of the ~~Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Directors~~proxy holders. Proxies cannot be voted for more than 14 nominees. We have no reason to believe any nominee will be unable to stand for election.

What options do I have in voting on each of the proposals?

The directors are elected by a plurality, ofand the ~~votes cast by the shares entitled to vote in the election at a meeting at which a quorum is present. Accordingly, the~~ 14 nominees ~~for election as directors at the Annual Meeting who receive~~receiving the greatest number of votes cast ~~for~~"FOR" their election will be elected as directors of the ~~duly elected directors.~~Company. Votes withheld from any nominee have no legal effect on the election of directors due to the fact that such elections are by a plurality of the votes cast. ~~Passage of the proposals concerning the 2009 executive compensation and the appointment of t he independent registered public accounting firm require the~~

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares ~~voting on the proposals~~present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting ~~in person or by proxy. Abstentions~~ and ~~any “broker non-votes,” which occur when brokers are prohibited from exercising voting authority~~entitled to vote is required to approve the 2012 compensation of the named executive officers and the ratification of the appointment of McGladrey LLP as our registered independent public accounting firm for ~~beneficial owners who have not provided voting instructions or otherwise do not~~the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013.

The vote on ~~a proposition,~~our executive compensation is advisory and is not binding on the directors of the Company. However, the Compensation Committee of the Board will consider stockholder votes in establishing our compensation plans for subsequent years.

Broker non-votes will not be counted as entitled to vote, but will count for ~~the purpose~~purposes of determining whether or not a quorum is present on the ~~number~~matter. So long as a quorum is present, broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of ~~votes cast.~~the matters to be presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

~~If any matters not described~~The proxy card included in this proxy statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxies will use their personal judgment to determine how to vote your shares. The Company is not aware of any matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than the proposals described above.

If the Annual Meeting is adjourned and reconvened, the proxies can vote your shares at the reconvened meeting (within eleven months of the date of your proxy) unless you have revoked your proxy instructions.

If you hold shares through a broker, follow the voting instructions provided by your broker. If you want to vote in person, a legal proxy must be obtained from your broker and brought to the Annual Meeting. If you do not submit voting instructions to your broker for the election of the directors, your broker is not permitted to vote in the director election on your behalf. Your broker is generally permitted to vote your shares in its discretion on all other matters.

~~Holders of stock in the Company’s Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan (“the Plan”) can direct the Trustee of the Plan how to vote~~indicates the number of shares ~~held in~~owned by an account attributable to you.

Where do I find the ~~Plan for the benefit~~voting results of the Holder as of the record date for any matter put to the vote of the Shareholders. If a Holder does not provide timely voting directions to the Trustee, then the Trustee shall vote the shares held for the benefit of the Holder in the same proportion as those shares of stock held in the Plan for which the Trustee has received proper directions for voting.meeting?

We will announce preliminary voting results at the meeting. The voting results will also be disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file within four business days after the meeting.

~~A form~~Who bears the cost of proxy is enclosed. Before the Annual Meeting, you can appoint a proxy to vote your shares of stock by completing and signing the enclosed proxy card and mailing it in time to be received before the Annual Meeting, or by using the Internet (http://www.ilstk.com). The electronic proxy appointment procedures are designed to confirm your identity and to allow you to give your proxy voting instructions. If you wish to vote via the Internet, please follow the instructions on the proxy card.

If your proxy is properly signed and returned and not withdrawn or revoked, then the shares represented thereby will be voted in accordance with your instructions. If the manner of voting such shares is not indicated on the proxy, the shares will be voted FOR the election of the nominees for directors named herein, FOR approval of the 2009 executive compensation disclosed herein, and FOR the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm.

If the enclosed proxy is executed and returned, it may nevertheless be revoked at any time prior to the Annual Meeting. You may revoke a proxy electronically by entering a new vote via the Internet or by filing either a written revocation of the proxy or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date with the Secretary of the Company at the Company's principal office at 1601 22nd Street, West Des Moines, Iowa 50266, Attn: Alice A. Jensen, Corporate Secretary. You may also withdraw a proxy by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting without voting in person will not serve as the revocation of a proxy.soliciting proxies?

The Company will bear the cost of ~~solicitation of~~soliciting proxies. In addition to ~~the use of~~solicitations by mail, ~~proxies may be solicited by~~our officers, directors, ~~and~~or employees, ~~of the Company,~~ without extra compensation, may solicit proxies in person, via email, or by ~~telephone, email, facsimile, or personal contact. It will greatly assist the Company in limiting expense in connection with the Annual Meeting if each Shareholder who does not expect~~telephone. We may reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to ~~attend the Annual Meeting will promptly return a signed proxy or vote via the Internet.~~stockholders.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE RETURN YOUR MARKED AND SIGNED PROXY CARD PROMPTLY SO YOUR SHARES CAN BE REPRESENTED, EVEN IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON.

PROPOSALS FOR ANNUAL MEETING

Item 1. Election of Directors.

1. ~~Election~~ ~~of Directors~~. The Board currently consists of thirteen members. In addition, the Company expects that on or about April 1, 2010, David D. Nelson will become Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and will be added to the Board to serve until the April 29 Annual Meeting. The term for directors is until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation, removal from office, death, or incapacity.

The Bylaws of the Company provide that the number of directors of the Company shall not be less than 5 ornor greater than 15. The Board currently consists of 11 members. For reasons explained below in the Report of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has set the number of directors for ~~2010~~2013 at ~~14.~~14. Proxies cannot be voted for more than 14 persons.

The term for directors is until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation, removal from office, death, or incapacitation.

The Board recommends a vote ~~FOR~~"FOR" each of the nominees listed in the table ~~on the next page.~~below.

~~Proxies~~Properly executed proxies in the accompanying form will be voted ~~FOR~~"FOR" the election of the listed individuals, unless contrary instructions are given. If any nominee or nominees shall become unavailable for election, it is intended that the ~~proxies~~size of the Board will be ~~voted for the election of the substitute nominees, if any,~~reduced accordingly provided that the ~~Board may propose.~~number of nominees shall not be less than 5. Any ~~Shareholder~~stockholder has the option to withhold authority to vote for any or all nominees or to withhold authority to vote for individual nominees. Votes withheld from any nominee have no legal effect on the election of directors due to the fact that such elections are by a plurality of the votes cast.

Information concerning the nominees, including their ages, year first elected as a director, and business experience during the previous five years as of ~~March 1, 2010,~~February 21, 2013, is set forth ~~on the following pages.~~below. All of the nominees, except ~~Mr. Nelson,~~Michael J. Gerdin, Sean P. McMurray, and Philip Jason Worth, are currently serving as directors of the ~~Company, and all~~Company. All of the nominees, except ~~Messrs. Crowley~~Mr. Gerdin and ~~Nelson, also serve~~Mr. McMurray, are currently serving as directors of the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, West Bank. Mr. Nelson has been elected to the West Bank Board effective upon the commencement of his employment by the Company, which is expected to be on or about April 1. Mr. Crowley serves as an emeritus member of the West Bank Board of Directors.



Name (Age)	Has Served as Director Since	Principal Occupation and/or Position with Company and ~~its~~West Bank and Location ~~Subsidiaries and/or Principal Occupation~~

Frank W. Berlin (Age ~~64)~~67)	1995	~~President,~~Consultant, Frank W. Berlin & Associates, and Director of the Company and West Bank West Des Moines, Iowa

Thomas A. Carlstrom (Age ~~64)~~67)	2009	Neurosurgeon, ~~Private~~private practice, and Director of the Company and West Bank Des Moines, Iowa

Joyce A. Chapman (Age ~~65)~~	~~2009~~	~~Executive Vice President, West Bank – Retired~~

~~Orville E. Crowley~~ ~~(Age 83)~~	~~1984~~	~~President and Chief Operating Officer, Linden Lane Farms Company,~~ ~~Cumming, Iowa~~

~~Douglas R. Gulling~~ ~~(Age 56)~~68)	2009	~~Executive Vice President~~Retired and Director of the Company and West Bank Des Moines, Iowa
Steven K. Gaer (Age 52)	2011	Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel, R&R Realty Group, and Director of the Company and West Bank West Des Moines, Iowa
Michael J. Gerdin (Age 43)	-	Chairman and Chief ~~Financial~~Executive Officer, ~~of the Company;~~Heartland Express, Inc. ~~Chief Financial Officer of West Bank~~North Liberty, Iowa

Kaye R. Lozier (Age ~~64)~~67)	2009	Director of Donor Relations, Community Foundation of Greater Des Moines, and Director of the Company and West Bank Des Moines, Iowa
Sean P. McMurray (Age 45)	-	Senior Vice President, Equifax, Inc. Clive, Iowa
David R. Milligan (Age ~~62)~~65)	~~2002~~2009	~~Interim Chief Executive Officer~~Chairman and Director of the ~~Company;~~ ~~Interim Chairman~~Company and ~~Chief Executive Officer~~Director of West Bank
		West Des Moines, Iowa
George D. Milligan (Age ~~53)~~56)	2005	President, The Graham Group, Inc., and Director of the Company and West Bank Des Moines, Iowa

David D. Nelson (Age ~~49)~~52)	~~---~~2010	Chief Executive Officer, President, and ~~President~~Director of the Company; Chairman, ~~and~~ Chief Executive Officer, and Director of West Bank West Des Moines, Iowa ~~(anticipated commencement on or about April 1, 2010)~~

James W. Noyce (Age ~~54)~~57)	2009	~~Senior Advisor~~Retired and ~~Major Gifts Officer, Drake University Athletics,~~Director of the Company and West Bank West Des Moines, Iowa

Robert G. Pulver (Age ~~62)~~65)	1984	President and Chief Executive Officer, All-State Industries, Inc., and Director of the Company and West Bank West Des Moines, Iowa

~~Jack G. Wahlig~~Lou Ann Sandburg (Age ~~77)~~64)	~~2001~~2011	~~Chairman~~Retired and Director of the ~~Company;~~ ~~President, Integrus Financial, L.C.,~~Company and West Bank Clive, Iowa

~~Connie Wimer~~Philip Jason Worth (Age ~~77)~~41)	~~1985~~-	~~Chairman, Business Publications Corporation,~~Sales Manager, Gilcrest/Jewett Lumber Company, and Director of West Bank West Des Moines, Iowa

~~Brad L. Winterbottom~~ ~~(Age 53)~~	~~2009~~	~~Executive Vice President of the Company;~~ ~~President of West Bank~~

The particular experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills that led the Board to conclude that each nominee should serve as a director are as follows.

Frank W. Berlin has served as a ~~director~~Director of West Bank since 1995. Mr. Berlin is a consultant and former President of Frank W. Berlin & Associates, a West Des Moines company specializing in employee benefits. He ~~has extensive knowledge of and familiarity with the Central Iowa business and investing communities, which are target constituencies of the Company. He~~ also has extensive knowledge and experience with executive compensation programs.

Thomas A. Carlstrom has served as a ~~director~~Director of West Bank since 1996. Dr. Carlstrom is a neurosurgeon in private practice in Des Moines. He has extensive knowledge of and familiarity with the Central Iowa business ~~and investing communities, which are target constituencies of the Company.~~

~~Proxy Statement Table of Contents~~community.

Joyce A. Chapman has served as a ~~director~~Director of West Bank since 1975. ~~Ms.~~Mrs. Chapman served as an officer of West Bank from 1971 until she retired as Executive Vice President in 2006. During her career at West Bank, she served in a variety of capacities, covering virtually all aspects of bank administration and operation. ~~Ms.~~Mrs. Chapman is also a board member of the public company American Equity Investment Life Holding ~~Company.~~Company of West Des Moines, Iowa. She has extensive knowledge and experience with bank ~~regulation as well as~~ practices and procedures. ~~She also~~

Steven K. Gaer has served as a Director of West Bank since 2011. Mr. Gaer is Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel for R&R Realty Group, Central Iowa's largest commercial real estate development, management, and investment company. He has extensive knowledge of commercial real estate structuring, financing, and underwriting. He is also currently serving as the Mayor of the City of West Des Moines, Iowa; a position he has held since April 2007. Mr. Gaer is also serving on the following boards: Greater Des Moines Partnership; Choose Des Moines Communities; Metropolitan Planning Organization; and the County Assessor Boards for Polk, Dallas, Madison, and Warren counties.

Michael J. Gerdin is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Heartland Express, Inc. which is a publicly traded company that is a short-to-medium haul truckload carrier with corporate headquarters in North Liberty, Iowa. From 1998 to 2001, he was President of A&M Express, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Heartland Express. In 2001 Mr. Gerdin was appointed as Vice-President of Regional Operations, and in 2006 he was appointed as President of the Company. He became Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 2011. Mr. Gerdin has familiarity with the ~~Central~~Eastern Iowa business community and ~~investing communities, which are target constituencies of the Company.~~has extensive experience in a public company environment.

Orville E. Crowley serves as an emeritus member of the West Bank board of directors and was a board member for 23 years. Mr. Crowley is President and Chief Operating Officer of Linden Lane Farms Company, a family farm corporation in Madison and Warren Counties in Iowa. Mr. Crowley is a former owner and President of Ringland-Johnson-Crowley Company, a general contractor. He has considerable knowledge of the real estate development businesses that are substantial sources of loan business for West Bank.

~~Douglas~~Kaye R. ~~Gulling~~Lozier has served as a ~~director~~Director of West Bank since 2005. Mr. Gulling joined the Company in 2001 as Chief Financial Officer and was named Chief Financial Officer of West Bank in 2002. In 2004, he was elected Executive Vice President of the Company. Mr. Gulling is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and has been employed in the banking industry since 1979.

~~Kaye R. Lozier has served as a director of West Bank since 2005. Ms.~~Mrs. Lozier is the Director of Donor Relations for the Community Foundation of Greater Des Moines. She is ~~also actively~~ involved in the Des Moines area, serving as ~~chair~~Chair for the Des Moines Enterprise Zone Commission. ~~She~~

Sean P. McMurray served as the Chief Executive Officer and founder of DataVision Resources for the past fifteen years. DataVision Resources was recently acquired by Equifax, Inc., and he now serves as a Senior Vice President at Equifax, Inc. Equifax specializes in the development and implementation of information technology platforms designed to enhance data and workflow processes and solutions. In conjunction with DataVision and Equifax, Mr. McMurray has provided assistance to notable financial services companies, including Wells Fargo & Co., Bank of America, and The Principal Financial Group. Previously, he was the Chief Technology Officer of SmartyPig, LLC and was principally responsible for managing the integration with SmartyPig, LLC partner banks. This included satisfying all regulatory and compliance issues, monitoring risk and security during and post integration, designing accounting and tax solutions on the financial aspects of SmartyPig, LLC, and managing training and interaction between SmartyPig, LLC and the partner banks. He has also helped to build and design the business platform for Businessolver, LLC where he serves as an owner and board member. Mr. McMurray has extensive knowledge ~~of and familiarity with~~related to technology in the ~~Central Iowa business and investing communities, which are target constituencies of the Company.~~financial services industry.

David R. Milligan has served as a ~~director~~Director of West Bank since 2000. ~~At the request of the Board,~~ Mr. Milligan ~~was elected interim Chief Executive Officer~~has served as Chairman of the Company ~~and West Bank in July 2009.~~since April 2010. Mr. Milligan joined West Bank in 1980 and served in various capacities, including General Counsel. He retired as Executive Vice President of the Company, and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of West Bank on December 31, 2004. He served as a ~~director~~Director of the Company from 2002 through 2004, and as Vice Chairman of West Bank until December 2006. He was a self-employed attorney and “Of Counsel” with Ahlers & Cooney, P.C. of Des Moines, Iowa, from March 2007 through February 2009. Mr. Milligan resumed part-time employment with West Bank in February 2009 and ~~full- time~~full-time employment in May 2009. HeMr. Milligan was ~~a senior executive officer~~elected interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company and interim Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of West Bank ~~during much~~in July 2009 and served in those positions until April 1, 2010. He then served as Executive Vice President of ~~their most profitable times.~~West Bank from April 1, 2010, through April 30, 2010. He has extensive knowledge of bank regulatory matters, ~~and~~ loan portfolio ~~management.~~management, and corporate governance.

George D. Milligan has served as a ~~director~~Director of West Bank since 1994. Mr. Milligan is President of the Graham Group, Inc., a Des Moines, Iowa-based real estate development and investment company. He has extensive knowledge of commercial real estate financing and ~~underwriting, and familiarity with the Central Iowa business and investing communities, which are target constituencies of the Company.~~underwriting. He is also a board member of the public company United Fire & Casualty ~~Company.~~Company of Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

David D. Nelson has ~~been hired~~served as a Director of West Bank since 2010. Mr. Nelson joined the ~~Company’s new~~Company on April 1, 2010, as Chief Executive Officer and President ~~effective on or about April 1, 2010.~~and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of West Bank. Mr. Nelson has more than 2527 years of experience in commercial banking. ~~He most recently has been~~Prior to joining the Company, he was the President of Southeast Minnesota Business Banking and President, Wells Fargo Bank Rochester, in Rochester, Minnesota. He has strong backgrounds in customer relationship building, credit, and leadership development.

James W. Noyce has served as a ~~director~~Director of ~~the Company and~~ West Bank since ~~July~~ 2009. Mr. Noyce ~~is the Senior Advisor and Major Gifts Officer for Drake University Athletics. He~~ has nearly three decades of experience in the financial services industry, most recently as Chief Executive Officer of FBL Financial Group, Inc. and Farm Bureau Financial Services Companies from January 2007 through April 2009 and Chief Financial Officer from January 1996 through December 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Noyce held various positions with FBL Financial Group, Inc. and Farm Bureau Financial Services Companies, including Controller and Vice President. He served on the Advisory Committee to Farm Bureau Bank for approximately seven years until May 2009. Mr. Noyce served as the Senior Advisor and Major Gifts Officer for Drake University Athletics from August 2009 to November 2010. Mr. Noyce is a board member of the public company United Fire & Casualty Company of Cedar Rapids, Iowa. He is also a board member of the ~~public com pany United Fire & Casualty Company.~~registered investment company Berthel Fisher Financial Services, Inc. of Marion, Iowa. He is an audit committee financial expert and ~~is expected to become chair~~serves as Chair of the Audit ~~Committee should Mr. Wahlig choose not to continue in that role.~~Committee. Mr. Noyce is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive), a Fellow of the Casualty Actuarial Society, and an Associate of the Society of Actuaries.

Robert G. Pulver has served as a ~~director~~Director of West Bank since 1981. He has also served as Vice Chairman of the Board since July 2009. Mr. Pulver is the President and Chief Executive Officer of All-State Industries, Inc., an industrial rubber products manufacturer, which he founded and has operated for 3437 years. He

Lou Ann Sandburg has served as a Director of West Bank since 2011. Mrs. Sandburg served as Vice President of Investments at FBL Financial Group, a publicly traded financial services company located in West Des Moines, Iowa, from 1998 until her retirement in 2008. From 1980 through 1998, Mrs. Sandburg managed various fixed-income portfolios at FBL. Mrs. Sandburg is ~~also~~ a board member of the ~~public~~registered investment company Berthel Fisher Financial Services, Inc. of Marion, Iowa. She is also a chartered financial analyst.

Philip Jason Worth has served as a Director of West Bank since 2011. He grew up in West Des Moines, Iowa, and has been working in the family business, Gilcrest/Jewett Lumber Company since 1999. Gilcrest/Jewett Lumber Company was founded in 1856, and Mr. Worth represents the sixth generation of ownership. The ~~Summit Group. He~~company supplies building materials to general contractors and homeowners in Central and Eastern Iowa and employs 230 people at four retail locations. The company focuses on building strong, lasting relationships, extending and managing their own credit, and staying active in the communities it serves. Mr. Worth has extensive knowledge of and familiarity with the ~~Central Iowa~~real estate construction business ~~and investing communities, which are target constituencies of the Company.~~

Jack G. Wahlig has served as a director of West Bank since 1997. Mr. Wahlig has served as Chairman of the Board since July 2009. He is President of Integrus Financial, L.C., a financial consulting company. Mr. Wahlig retired in 1995 as the national managing partner of the public accounting firm of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, after a 41-year career. He is an audit committee financial expert. He has extensive knowledge of and familiarity with the Central Iowa business and investing communities, which are target constituencies of the Company.

Connie Wimer has served as a director of West Bank since 1985. Ms. Wimer is Chairman and former owner/publisher of Business Publications Corporation. She is also the former owner and President of Iowa Title Company. She has extensive knowledge of and familiarity with the Central Iowa business and investing communities, which are target constituencies of the Company.

Brad L. Winterbottom has served as a director of West Bank since 2000. Mr. Winterbottom is Executive Vice President of the Company and President of West Bank. He joined West Bank in 1992 and has served as an executive and policy maker since 1998. He has extensive experience in commercial lending and loan portfolio administration and knowledge of the Central Iowa business community. Mr. Winterbottom has been employed in the ~~banking industry since 1981.~~Company's primary markets.

As noted above, with the exception of ~~Joyce A.~~Mrs. Chapman, who is a director of American Equity Investment Life Holding Company, ~~George D.~~Mr. Gerdin, who is a director of Heartland Express, Inc., Mr. G. Milligan, ~~and James W.~~who is a director of United Fire & Casualty Company, Mr. Noyce, who ~~are directors~~is a director of United Fire & Casualty Company and ~~Robert G. Pulver,~~Berthel Fisher Financial Services, Inc., and Mrs. Sandburg, who is a director of ~~The Summit Group,~~Berthel Fisher Financial Services, Inc., none of the other above nominees hold a directorship in any other company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 or subject to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. ~~Additionally, these~~Those are the only directorships which require disclosure that have been held by the nominees in the past five ~~years.~~years except for Mr. Pulver who was previously a director of The Summit Group.

None of the nominees for director have any family relationship with any other nominees or with any executive officers of the Company.

~~None~~

Item 2. Approve the 2012 Compensation of the ~~nominees for director have been involved in any legal proceedings during the past ten years that require disclosure.~~Company's Named Executive Officers.

2. ~~Approve~~Section 14A of the ~~2009 Compensation~~Exchange Act, as created by Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), enacted in July 2010, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder by the SEC, require publicly traded companies, such as the Company, to conduct an advisory stockholder vote to approve compensation of named executive officers. This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives stockholders the opportunity to endorse or not endorse the Company’s pay program for its named executive officers. We currently hold our says-on-pay vote every year. The Company is requesting stockholder approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s ~~Named Executive Officers.~~named executive officers for ~~Section 111 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008,~~2012 as amended by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, requires the Company, as an entity that has received financial assistance through the United States Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, to permit a separate shareholder vote to approve, on a non-binding basis, the 2009 compensation of executives as disclosedlisted in the ~~“Executive Compensation”~~Summary Compensation Table (appearing on page 28 of this proxy statement) and as described in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this ~~Proxy Statement.~~proxy statement. The ~~shareholder~~Company believes that its executive compensation programs, as explained in the Executive Compensation section of this proxy statement, are straightforward and reasonable. As explained in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the general objectives of, and important factors for, the Company's executive compensation program include significant emphasis on the long-term success of the Company through long-term performance of its executives. Stockholders are urged to carefully read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and narrative disclosures that describe the compensation of our named executive officers in 2012. The Board has previously approved the 2012 compensation.

The following resolution is submitted for stockholder approval:

"RESOLVED, that West Bancorporation, Inc.'s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, its executive compensation as described in the section captioned 'Compensation Discussion and Analysis' and the tabular disclosure regarding named executive officer compensation under 'Executive Compensation' contained in the West Bancorporation's proxy statement dated March 6, 2013."

Approval of this resolution requires the number of votes cast for the proposal to exceed the number of votes cast against the proposal at the Annual Meeting. In tabulating this vote, ~~shall~~abstentions will be disregarded and have no effect on the outcome of the vote. While this say-on-pay vote is required, as provided in Section 14A of the Exchange Act, it is not be binding on the Board and may not be construed as overruling any decision by the Board. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the ~~Board or creating or implying any additional fiducia ry duty by the Board or as restricting or limiting the ability of shareholders to make~~votes when considering future ~~proposals for inclusion in proxy materials related to executive compensation. The Company’s Board of Directors has previously approved the 2009 compensation.~~compensation arrangements.

The Board recommends a vote ~~FOR~~"FOR" approval of the ~~2009~~2012 compensation of the named executive ~~compensation.~~officers. Proxies in the accompanying form will be voted ~~FOR~~"FOR" approval of the ~~2009~~2012 compensation of the named executive ~~compensation~~officers unless contrary instructions are given.

Item 3. Ratify the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

The Audit Committee of the ~~Company’s~~ Board ~~of Directors~~ has selected the accounting firm of McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~ LLP, independent certified public accountants, as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for the year ending December 31, ~~2010.~~2013. McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~ LLP will conduct the audit examination of the Company and its ~~subsidiaries~~subsidiary for ~~2010.~~2013. McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~ LLP was also the independent registered public accounting firm and performed the ~~Company’s~~Company's audit for the years ending December 31, ~~2009~~2012 and ~~2008.~~2011. The Company is asking its ~~Shareholders~~stockholders to ratify the appointment of McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~ LLP. For a description of the fees for services rendered by McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~ LLP for ~~2009~~2012 and ~~2008,~~2011, and a description of the ~~Company’s~~Company's policy regarding the approval of independent registered public ~~accountants’~~accountants' fees, see the section of this ~~report~~proxy statement titled ~~“Independent~~Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

Although ratification by the ~~Shareholders~~stockholders is not required by law, the Board has determined that it is desirable to request stockholder approval of ~~this selection by the Shareholders.~~its appointment of McGladrey LLP. In the event the ~~Shareholders~~stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will consider this factor when making any future determination regarding McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~ LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its ~~Shareholders.~~stockholders.

~~The Board recommends a vote FOR~~Under applicable law, the ratification of the appointment of McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~LLP requires the number of votes cast for the proposal to exceed the number of votes cast against the proposal at the Annual Meeting. In tabulating the votes, abstentions on the ratification of the appointment of McGladrey LLP will be disregarded and have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

The Board recommends a vote "FOR" the ratification of the appointment of McGladrey LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2013.Proxies in the accompanying form will be voted "FOR" the ratification of the appointment of McGladrey LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2010. Proxies in the accompanying form will be voted FOR the ratification of the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2010,2013, unless contrary instructions are given.

4.Other Matters. ~~Other~~ ~~Matters.~~ Management does not know of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting, but should other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the proxies will vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

GOVERNANCE AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS

General

Generally, the Board oversees our business and monitors the performance of our management. In accordance with our corporate governance procedures, the Board does not involve itself in the day-to-day operations of the Company, which is monitored by our executive officers and management. Our directors fulfill their duties and responsibilities by attending regular meetings of the full Board, which are generally held on a quarterly basis, special meetings held from time to time, and through committee membership, which is discussed below. Our directors also discuss business and other matters with our key executives and our principal external advisors, such as our legal counsel, auditors, and other consultants.

~~BOARD~~ ~~OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD~~The Board currently has 11 directors and will have 14 directors after the Annual Meeting, if all nominees set forth in this proxy statement are elected. The Board has determined that the following 9 existing directors are “independent” as defined by the Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) and Item 407 of Regulation S-K, and the Board has determined that the independent directors do not have other relationships with us that prevent them from making objective, independent decisions.

Frank W. Berlin

Thomas A. Carlstrom

Joyce A. Chapman

Steven K. Gaer

Kaye R. Lozier

George D. Milligan

James W. Noyce

Robert G. Pulver

Lou Ann Sandburg

The Board has also determined that new nominees, Michael J. Gerdin, Sean P. McMurray, and Philip Jason Worth, would be independent directors, if elected.

In 2012, the Board ~~Leadership Structure~~ held five regularly scheduled meetings, one organizational meeting, and one Executive Committee meeting. Each director is required to attend at least 75% of the full Board meetings and the meetings of any committees on which the director serves. This requirement was satisfied by all directors. Board members are encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting, and all Board members attended the 2012 Annual Meeting, except Ms. Chapman.

The Board has established the following standing committees:

Audit Committee

Compensation Committee

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Risk Committee

The Board has adopted written charters for each standing committee. The charters may be seen on the Investor Relations, Corporate Governance section of the Company's website (www.westbankiowa.com). The primary responsibilities of the committees are described below. The 2012 report of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees follows the descriptions.

~~Prior to July 15, 2009, the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the~~ Board ~~had been combined throughout the entire history of the Company. However, given the extraordinary circumstances and economic environment then challenging the Company, the~~Leadership Structure

The Board ~~determined~~believes that having ~~an independent~~a non-chief executive officer director serve as Chairman of the Board ~~would be~~is in the best interests of ~~shareholders.~~stockholders. The Board intends to maintain the leadership structure of a non-chief executive officer chairman for at least the foreseeable future. The Board and its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe that this structure will continue to be ~~particularly~~ useful in providing consistent oversight and strategic direction to ~~the Company given that Mr. Nelson, who will assume the Chief Executive Officer position on or about April 1, has not p reviously been employed by~~ the Company. The Board does not intend to micro-manage the Company and ~~it looks forward to~~expects Mr. Nelson ~~taking~~to take the lead in developing ~~the~~ strategic ~~direction~~plans and ~~day to day~~day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company. The Board intends to periodically review its leadership structure and make changes as dictated by the circumstances and the best interests of the ~~shareholders.~~stockholders.

~~Board’s~~

Board's Role in Risk Oversight

The ~~Company’s~~ Board ~~performs~~has historically performed its risk oversight function primarily through ~~its three standing committees,~~the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees, which report to the whole Board and are comprised solely of independent directors. In 2010, the Board established a Risk Committee to begin formalizing Board involvement in risk management. In 2012, the Risk Committee formally began its duties of monitoring and overseeing the enterprise risk management process for the Company. The Board also uses an Executive Committee comprised of four independent directors, the Chairman, and the ~~chief executive officer~~Chief Executive Officer for ~~frequent~~ updates and ~~consultations. It is not uncommon for the Executive Committee to be involved in multiple conferences a month. In addition, since July 2009, the Chair of the Company’s Board has been~~consultations on an ~~independent director (Mr. Wahlig).~~as needed basis. This structure has provided greater day-to-day Board awareness of policy and operational issues at the Company.

The ~~Board’s~~Risk Committee is comprised of independent directors and may request any officer of the Company to attend meetings, including Harlee Olafson, the Company's Chief Risk Officer. A charter was first adopted for this committee during 2012. Under its charter, the Risk Committee is charged with identifying and assessing the risks facing the Company and overseeing the development, implementation, and monitoring of the Company's risk management process. The Risk Committee also oversees the division of risk-related responsibilities to each of the other Board committees. The Risk Committee is currently overseeing and reviewing with management the Company's credit, market, liquidity, reputation, regulatory, strategic, and similar risks on a quarterly basis. On an annual basis, the Risk Committee reviews policies and procedures regarding risk management, information technology and safety, liquidity, and any other policies regarding employee conduct. The functions of the Risk Committee are detailed at length in its charter, which may be viewed on the Company's website (www.westbankiowa.com) under Investor Relations, Corporate Governance.

The Board's Audit Committee, which also functions as West ~~Bank’s audit committee,~~Bank's Audit Committee, is charged with reviewing with management the ~~Company’s~~Company's financial, ~~credit, market, liquidity, reputation,~~ transaction, and operational risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the ~~Company’s~~Company's risk assessment and risk management policies. These reviews are completed at least annually. ~~The Audit Committee receives quarterly reports of the securities in West Bank’s investment portfolio.~~ In addition, the Audit Committee has quarterly executive sessions with both the Company's independent and internal auditors concerning any topic of concern to the auditors. Internal auditing is done by an independent public accounting firm retained by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee also retains and receives an annual report from an ~~auditing~~independent public accounting firm employed specifically to review West ~~Bank’s Trust Department.~~Bank's trust department.

The Compensation Committee is charged in its charter with at least annually reviewing all compensation policies, practices, and plans of the Company to determine whether they encourage excessive risk-taking or pose any other threat to the safety and soundness of the Company or ~~its subsidiaries~~West Bank or are otherwise inconsistent with the ~~shareholders' long term~~stockholders' long-term best interests. ~~The Committee meets at least every six months with senior officers to discuss any unnecessary or excessive risks posed by the compensation programs.~~

Code of Ethics

~~West Bank’s Directors Loan Committee, which includes four independent Company~~We have a Code of Conduct in place that applies to all of our directors, ~~considers~~officers and ~~approves~~employees. The Code of Conduct sets forth the standard of ethics that we expect all of our directors, officers, and employees to follow, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Code of Conduct may be viewed on the Company's website (www.westbankiowa.com) under Investor Relations, Corporate Governance. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to or ~~declines all credit relationships greater than $5 million. A majority~~waiver of the ~~independent directors must be present~~Code of Conduct with respect to ~~constitute a quorum~~our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on our website. The Risk Committee reviewed the Company's Code of ~~that committee. This committee also reviews West Bank’s “watch list” of classified loans at its monthly meetings. The watch list information~~Conduct during 2012 and ~~a report from West Bank’s President is also provided~~recommended changes to the ~~full bank board,~~Board, which ~~presently consists of~~ the ~~full West Bancorporation~~ Board ~~except Mr. Crowley, at each of its ten meetings held during the year.~~implemented.

~~Representatives of the West Bank Board receive, review, and must sign all bank regulatory examination reports.~~

~~---------~~

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board currently has thirteen directors and will have fourteen directors by the time of the Annual Meeting due to Mr. Nelson’s election by the Board, which is expected to become effective on or about April 1. The Board has determined that the following ten directors are “independent” as defined by the Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) and Item 407 of Regulation S-K.

~~Frank W. Berlin~~

~~Thomas A. Carlstrom~~

~~Joyce A. Chapman~~

~~Orville E. Crowley~~

~~Kaye R. Lozier~~

~~George D. Milligan~~

~~James W. Noyce~~

~~Robert G. Pulver~~

~~Jack G. Wahlig~~

~~Connie Wimer~~

In 2009, the Board held four regularly scheduled quarterly meetings. One organizational meeting, three special meetings, and several Executive Committee meetings were also held. Each director is required to attend at least 75 percent of the full Board meetings and the meetings of any committees on which the director serves. This requirement was satisfied by all directors, except Mr. Carlstrom. Mr. Carlstrom was absent from the organizational meeting and one special meeting. Board members are encouraged to attend the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, and all Board members attended the 2009 Annual Meeting, except Mr. Carlstrom, Mr. David R. Milligan, and Mr. George Milligan.

~~The Board has established the following standing committees:~~

~~Audit Committee~~

~~Compensation Committee~~

~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee~~

The Board has adopted written charters for each standing committee. The charters may be seen on the Investor Relations, Corporate Governance section of the Company’s website (www.westbankiowa.com). The membership and primary responsibilities of the committees are described below. The 2009 report of each committee follows its description.

Consistent with the Nasdaq Listing Rules, the independent directors have executive sessions where only the independent directors are present as part of each regularly scheduled quarterly Board meeting. During 2009, the independent directors met in executive session several times.

Audit Committee. The members of the Audit Committee are ~~Jack G. Wahlig,~~James W. Noyce, Chair, Joyce A. Chapman, George D. Milligan, ~~James W.~~and Lou Ann Sandburg. Each of the Audit Committee Members is considered "independent" according to Nasdaq listing requirements and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act, as required for audit committee membership. Mr. Noyce ~~and Connie Wimer. Messrs. Wahlig and Noyce are “financial experts”~~is an "audit committee financial expert" as defined in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related ~~regulations.~~regulations based on his level of education and work experience, as described previously in this proxy statement. The Audit Committee selects the independent auditors; reviews with the independent and internal auditors the plan, scope, and results of the ~~auditors’~~auditors' services; approves their fees; and reviews the ~~Company’s~~Company's financial reporting and internal control functions and risk assessment. ~~Additionally, the~~The Audit Committee ~~reviews all policies of the Company and its subsidiaries, except the West Bank loan and trust policies, prior~~has authority to ~~submission of the policies to the Board for approva l.~~retain special legal, accounting, or other consultants as it deems appropriate or necessary. The Audit Committee also performs the other duties set forth in its charter. The Audit Committee is prepared to meet privately at any time at the request of the independent registered public accountants or members of management to review any special situation arising on any of the above subjects. The Audit Committee reviews its charter at least annually and recommends changes to the Board when deemed necessary. The Audit Committee met four times during ~~2009. George D.~~2012 and also met with the Company's management and internal and independent auditors four times in executive session. Messrs. G. Milligan and ~~James W.~~ Noyce are members of the Audit Committee who also serve on the audit committee of another listed company (United Fire & Casualty Company). Mrs. Sandburg also serves on the audit committee of Berthel Fisher Financial Services, Inc., a listed company. The functions of the Audit Committee are detailed at length in its charter, which may be viewed on the Company's website (www.westbankiowa.com) under Investor Relations, Corporate Governance.

~~Audit~~Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee consists of Steven K. Gaer, Chair, Frank W. Berlin, Thomas A. Carlstrom, and Robert G. Pulver, all of whom are considered "independent" as defined by Nasdaq listing requirements, an "outside" director pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and a "non-employee" director under Section 16 of the Exchange Act. As required by the Compensation Committee's charter, the members of the Compensation Committee are elected annually by the independent directors of the Board. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the Company's compensation and benefit programs, including compensation for the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee makes compensation recommendations to the Board concerning amounts and the form of executive and director compensation. The independent directors of the Board determine the compensation. The Compensation Committee has authority to retain consultants and advisors, which it does periodically. The Compensation Committee did use a compensation consultant in 2011 and 2012. The Compensation Committee retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. ("F.W. Cook") in July 2011 to provide the Compensation Committee with independent, objective analysis and professional opinions on executive compensation matters.

F.W. Cook was independent, reported directly to the Chair of the Compensation Committee and performed no other work for the Company. During 2011, F.W. Cook assisted the Compensation Committee in its review of the total compensation program, including gathering and analyzing market data for compensation paid for similar positions at companies with which the Company competes for executive talent. F.W. Cook also provided input on marketplace trends and best practices relating to competitive pay levels, as well as developments in regulatory and technical matters. During 2012, F.W. Cook continued to review and monitor our executive compensation programs.

The Compensation Committee may delegate any of its authorities to a sub-committee, but has not done so to date. The Compensation Committee considers input from the executive officers concerning executive and other compensation, but is not required to do so. The Compensation Committee met 10 times during 2012. The functions of the Compensation Committee are detailed at length in its charter, which may be viewed on the Company's website (www.westbankiowa.com) under Investor Relations, Corporate Governance. Additional details about the Compensation Committee's processes and procedures are discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis below.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members are Kaye R. Lozier, Chair, Frank W. Berlin, George D. Milligan, and Robert G. Pulver, all of whom are considered "independent" as defined by Nasdaq listing requirements. As required by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee's charter, the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are elected annually by the independent directors of the Board. During 2012, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met five times. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding the composition and structure of the Board and nominations for election of directors, including the director nominees proposed in this proxy statement. It develops policies and processes regarding principles of corporate governance in order to ensure the Board's compliance with its fiduciary duties to the Company and its stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider for nomination at the 2014 Annual Meeting, as part of its nomination process, any director candidate recommended by a stockholder who follows the procedures shown under the heading 2014 Stockholder Proposals below.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee follows the process described below when identifying and evaluating nominees to the Board:

Procedures for identifying candidates:


a)	Review current directors of the Company;


b)	Review current directors of West Bank;


c)	Solicit input from existing directors and executive officers; and


d)	Review submissions from shareholders, if any.

The following criteria will be considered when evaluating nominee candidates:


a)	Composition

The Board should be composed of:


1.	Directors chosen with a view to bringing to the Board a variety of experiences and backgrounds;


2.	Directors who have high-level managerial experience or are accustomed to dealing with complex challenges; and


3.	Directors who will represent the balanced, best interests of the stockholders as a whole rather than special interest groups or constituencies while also taking into consideration the assessment of the overall composition and needs of the Board.

A majority of the Board's directors shall be independent directors under the criteria for independence created by the SEC and Nasdaq. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has historically considered diversity in its director nomination process without a formally developed policy. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee anticipates that it will continue to consider diversity in its nominating process by looking for differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skills, and other individual qualities and attributes as well as characteristics such as race, gender, and national origin.


b)	Selection Criteria

In considering possible candidates for nomination as a director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and other directors consider the following general guidelines and criteria:


1.	Each director should be of the highest character and integrity, have experience at or demonstrated understanding of strategy/policy-setting, and have a reputation for working constructively with others;


2.	Each director should have sufficient time available to devote to the affairs of the Company in order to carry out the responsibilities of a director;


3.	Each director should be free of any conflict of interest that would interfere with the proper performance of the responsibilities of a director; and


4.	The Chief Executive Officer is expected to be a director. Other members of senior management may be nominated to be directors, but Board membership is not necessary or a prerequisite for senior executive positions.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates all candidates in the same way, reviewing the aforementioned factors, among others, regardless of the source of such candidate, including stockholder recommendation. Because of this, there is no separate policy with regard to consideration of candidates recommended by stockholders.

~~Proxy Statement Table~~It has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T;

Audit Committee Report

The incorporation by reference of this proxy statement into any document filed with the SEC by the Company shall not be deemed to include the following report unless such report is specifically stated to be incorporated by reference into such document.

The Audit Committee hereby states as follows:

·	~~It has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, with management;~~

It has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, with management;

It has received the written disclosures and the letter from our independent accountant, McGladrey LLP, required by applicable requirements of ~~Contents~~the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant's independence;

Based on the review and discussions referred to immediately above, it recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, for filing with the SEC;

It has reviewed and approved or ratified all related party transactions between the Company and its directors; and

·	~~It has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, (AICPA,~~ ~~Professional Standards,~~ ~~Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T;~~

It has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountant required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence;

·	Based on the review and discussions referred to immediately above, it recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, for filing with the SEC;

·	~~It has reviewed and approved or ratified all related party transactions between the Company and its directors; and~~

·	The Board has approved the Audit Committee Charter.

The undersigned members of the Audit Committee have submitted this report.

~~Jack G. Wahlig,~~James W. Noyce, Chair

Joyce A. Chapman

George D. Milligan

~~James W. Noyce~~Lou Ann Sandburg

~~Connie Wimer~~

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

~~Compensation Committee.~~The members of the Compensation Committee ~~consists of Robert G. Pulver, Chair, Frank W. Berlin, and Orville E. Crowley, each of whom is an independent director. The~~are identified above. No Compensation Committee annually reviews the Company’s compensation and benefit programs, including compensation for the named executive officers. The Committee makes compensation recommendations to the Board concerning amounts and the form of executive and director compensation. The independent directorsmembers have ever been officers or employees of the ~~Board determine~~Company or West Bank. No executive officer served as a director or member of the ~~compensation. The Committee has authority to retain consultants and advisors, which it does periodically. The Committee did not use a~~ compensation ~~consultant in 2009. The Committee may delegate~~committee of any ~~of its authorities to a sub-committee. The Committee usually considers input from the~~other entity whose directors or executive officers concerning executive and other compensation, but is not required to do so. The Committee has not relied on substantial executive input concerning named executive officer compensation during the last two years. The Committee is required to meet at least semi-annually. It met five times during 2009. The functionsserved as a member of our Board or a member of the Committee are detailed at length in its charter, which may be viewed on the Company's website (www.westbankiowa.com) under Investor Relations, Corporate Governance. Additional details about the Committee’s processes and procedures are discussed in the Compensation ~~Discussion and Analysis below.~~Committee.

~~Compensation~~Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee hereby states as follows:

It has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement with management, and

Based on the review and discussion referred to immediately above, it recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and ~~discussed the Compensation Discussion & Analysis with management, and~~

·	~~Based on the review and discussion referred to immediately above, it recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion &~~ Analysis be included in ~~the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K and~~ this proxy statement.

~~As required by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as amended, the Compensation Committee certifies that during 2009 and subsequently as required:~~

It reviewed with senior risk officers the senior executive officer (“SEO”) compensation plans and has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that these plans do not encourage SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten the value of the Company;

~~It reviewed with senior risk officers the employee compensation plans and has made all reasonable efforts to limit any unnecessary risks these plans pose to the Company; and~~

It reviewed the employee compensation plans to eliminate any features of these plans that would encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of the Company to enhance the compensation of any employee.

The Company's compensation plans for its SEOs are detailed in written employment agreements between the Company and the SEOs. Mr. Milligan's employment agreement provides for a set salary ($250,000) and no incentive compensation while he is the interim Chief Executive Officer. The agreements with Messrs. Gulling and Winterbottom provide for stated base salaries (currently $210,000), potential annual bonuses, perquisites, and various severance benefits. The largest bonus ever awarded to either Messrs. Gulling or Winterbottom was $91,000. No bonuses were awarded for 2008 and 2009 and base salaries were not increased for 2009 and 2010 due to the performance of the Company. The Committee anticipate s a return to incentive bonus targets and perhaps grants of long-term restricted stock pursuant to the Company’s Restricted Stock Compensation Plan as part of the 2010 executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee does not believe that the SEO compensation plans have in any material way encouraged any officer to take unnecessary or excessive risks that threaten the value of the Company. The Company's compensation plan for non-SEO employees consists of salary, potential performance bonus, a holiday bonus of two percent of salary, and standard benefits, including 401(k) match and a contingent profit sharing plan contribution. The Compensation Committee does not believe that the non-SEO compensation plans create any material unnecessary risk for the Company or encourage the manipulation of reported earnings to enhance the compensation of any employee.

The undersigned members of the Compensation Committee have submitted this report.

~~Robert G. Pulver,~~Steven K. Gaer, Chair

Frank W. Berlin

~~Orville E. Crowley~~Thomas A. Carlstrom

Robert G. Pulver

~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The~~ Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ~~members are Frank W. Berlin, Chair, Joyce A. Chapman, and Robert G. Pulver, all of whom are independent directors.~~ Report

During ~~2009,~~2012, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ~~met three times. This Committee makes recommendations~~reviewed the composition of the existing Board giving specific attention to the ~~Board regarding~~questions of the ~~composition and structure~~desirable size of the Board and ~~nominations for election of directors, including~~how many insiders should be on the ~~director nominees proposed in this proxy statement. It develops policies and processes regarding principles of corporate governance in order to ensure the Board’s compliance with~~Board. Based on its ~~fiduciary duties to the Company and its shareholders, including establishment and periodic~~ review of ~~a code of ethics and conduct for all directors and employees. This Committee will consider, as part of its nomination process, any director candidate recommended by a Shareholder who follows~~these questions, the ~~procedures shown under the heading “2011 Shareholder Proposals.”~~

~~The~~ Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ~~follows~~decided to recommend increasing the ~~process described below when identifying and evaluating nominees to the Board:~~

~~Procedures for identifying candidates:~~

~~a) Review current directors~~size of the ~~Company.~~

b) Board to ~~Review current directors of the Company’s banking subsidiary, West Bank.~~14

c) ~~Solicit input from existing~~ directors and ~~executive officers.~~

d) ~~Review submissions from Shareholders, if any.~~

~~The following criteria will be considered when evaluating nominee candidates:~~

a) ~~Composition~~

~~The Board should be composed of:~~

~~Directors chosen with a view to bringing to the Board a variety of experiences and backgrounds;~~

~~Directors who have high-level managerial experience or are accustomed to dealing with complex challenges; and~~

Directors who will represent the balanced, best interests of the Shareholders as a whole rather than special interest groups or constituencies, while also taking into consideration the assessment of overall composition and needs of the Board.

~~A majority of~~recommended three additional nominees, Messrs. Gerdin, McMurray, and Worth. In addition, the ~~Board’s directors shall be independent directors under the criteria for independence as stated by the SEC and Nasdaq.~~

~~Selection Criteria~~

~~In considering possible candidates for nomination as an independent director, the Committee and other directors should consider the following general guidelines and criteria:~~

Each director should be of the highest character and integrity, have experience at or demonstrated understanding of strategy/policy-setting, and have a reputation for working constructively with others;

~~Each director should have sufficient time available to devote to the affairs of the Company in order to carry out the responsibilities of a director;~~

~~Each director should be free of any conflict of interest that would interfere with the proper performance of the responsibilities of a director; and~~

The chief executive officer is expected to be a director. Other members of senior management may be nominated to be directors, but Board membership is not necessary or a prerequisite for senior executive positions.

~~Nominating~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ~~Report~~decided that it was in the best interest of the stockholders to continue the model of having only one member of management, the Chief Executive Officer, on the Board in order to clearly differentiate the roles of the Board and management.

During 2009, the Committee conducted a search for new director candidates and retained the services of a director search firm. The Committee identified Mr. Noyce as a desirable candidate, especially given his financial services experience, local community presence, reputation for integrity, public company experience, and accounting expertise. Mr. Noyce was recommended to the Board by the Committee and was elected to fill a board vacancy on July 29, 2009.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also evaluated the qualifications and performance of each of the current members of the ~~Board of Directors.~~Board. In its evaluation, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee compared each of the current directors to the qualifications and characteristics of a director set forth in the ~~Committee’s~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee's charter. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee then polled each director to determine his or her willingness to stand for re-election and determined that each was willing to continue service. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee did not receive any stockholder recommendations for 2013 director nominees in 2012. No third party was retained, in any capacity, to provide assistance in either identifying or evaluating potential director nominees for 2013.

Based on the foregoing, the Nominating and ~~its belief that continuity at~~Corporate Governance Committee recommended to the Board ~~level was especially important during the next year when the Company will have a new chief executive officer~~that Frank W. Berlin, Thomas A. Carlstrom, Joyce A. Chapman, Steven K. Gaer, Kaye R. Lozier, David R. Milligan, George D. Milligan, David D. Nelson, James W. Noyce, Robert G. Pulver, and ~~will be attempting to recover from its recent unprecedented performance issues, the Committee concluded that each of the current Board members~~Lou Ann Sandburg should be nominated for re-election to the Board at the Annual Meeting. The Board also nominated Michael J. Gerdin, Sean P. McMurray, and Philip Jason Worth for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting. The Board accepted these recommendations.

The Committee has historically considered diversity in its director nomination process without a formally developed policy. The Committee anticipates that it will continue to consider diversity expansively to include differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skillDuring 2012, the Nominating and ~~other individual qualities and attributes as well as characteristics such as race, gender and national origin.~~

In February 2010, the Company received a director nomination from a Shareholder. The nomination was not timely under the Company’s procedures for shareholder nominations and the Committee did not have sufficient time to fully evaluate the nomination. However, the Committee will consider the nomination during it efforts for the 2011 director elections. It will evaluate the Shareholder nomination in the same manner it evaluates all other potential nominations.

~~The Committee anticipates some director retirements within the next year and intends to devote considerable time during the next year analyzing board leadership structure, size, and composition.~~

~~During 2009, the~~Corporate Governance Committee reviewed its charter and ~~submitted suggested~~minor changes were recommended to the ~~full Board.~~Board, which the Board implemented. The charter ~~was amended, in accordance with the Committee’s recommendations, and~~ may be reviewed on the ~~Company’s~~Company's website (www.westbankiowa.com) under Investors Relations, Corporate Governance. ~~The Committee also reviewed the Company’s Code of Conduct and recommended amendments that were adopted by the Board. The Code of Conduct may also be reviewed on the Company’s website.~~

The undersigned members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have submitted this report.

Kaye R. Lozier, Chair

Frank W. Berlin ~~Chair~~

~~Joyce A. Chapman~~George D. Milligan

Robert G. Pulver

Executive Officers of the Company

The following table sets forth summary information about the current executive officers of the Company.



Name	Age	Position with the Company or West Bank
Douglas R. Gulling	59	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company; Director and Chief Financial Officer of West Bank
David D. Nelson	52	Director, Chief Executive Officer, and President of the Company; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of West Bank
Harlee N. Olafson	55	Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of the Company; Director, Executive Vice President, and Chief Risk Officer of West Bank
Brad L. Winterbottom	56	Executive Vice President of the Company; Director and President of West Bank

The executive officers of the Company are elected on an annual basis by the Board of Directors. An executive officer may be removed by the Board of Directors, whenever in its judgment, the best interests of the Company will be served thereby.

The principal occupation or business and experience of the executive officers of the Company and West Bank for the past five years are set forth below.

Douglas R. Gulling is Executive Vice President (since 2004) and Chief Financial Officer (since 2001) of the Company. He was a member of the Company's Board from 2009 through April 2011. He also serves as a director (since 2005) and Chief Financial Officer (since 2002) of West Bank. Mr. Gulling is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and has been employed in the banking industry since 1979.

David D. Nelson is Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of West Bank (since 2010). Mr. Nelson is a member of the Company's Board (since 2010). Mr. Nelson has more than 27 years of experience in commercial banking. He most recently had been President, Southeast Minnesota Business Banking and President, Wells Fargo Bank Rochester in Rochester, Minnesota. He has strong backgrounds in customer relationship building, credit, and leadership development.

Harlee N. Olafson is Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of the Company and of West Bank (since 2010). He also serves as a director of West Bank (since 2011). Mr. Olafson has more than 33 years of experience in commercial banking. Prior to joining the Company, he was President, Southern Minnesota Business Banking and President, Wells Fargo Bank Mankato in Mankato, Minnesota. He has strong business development, credit, and team building backgrounds.

Brad L. Winterbottom is Executive Vice President of the Company (since 2006) and director and President (since 2000) of West Bank. He was a director of the Company's Board from 2009 through April 2011. He joined West Bank in 1992 and has served as an executive and policy maker since 1998. He has extensive experience in commercial lending and loan portfolio administration and knowledge of the Central Iowa business community. Mr. Winterbottom has been employed in the banking industry since 1981.

~~2009~~ ~~Directors’~~2012 Director Compensation

~~Directors~~For the first three quarters of 2012, directors of the Company received an annual retainer of $8,000, payable ~~quarterly, plus~~quarterly. Effective October 1, 2012, committee chairpersons began receiving an additional $500 per quarter. This change replaces the prior policy of paying committee chairpersons an additional $100 per committee meeting. Directors also receive $500 per regular meeting ~~(board~~(Board and ~~committee) or $600 for~~committee.) Members of the Audit Committee ~~meetings. If a committee meeting was on the same day as a regular board meeting, the fee paid for attending both meetings was~~receive $600 ~~for an~~per Audit Committee ~~meeting~~meeting. Mr. David Milligan also received a monthly fee of $5,000 for his service as Chairman of the Board. He maintains an office at the Company's headquarters and ~~$500~~works regular office hours on Board matters and special assignments for ~~any other committee meeting.~~West Bank. Directors of the Company who also served as directors of West Bank received fees of ~~$450~~$500 for each West Bank board meeting attended ~~(ten~~(11 meetings held) plus an annual retainer of $6,500, and $500 for ~~loan~~each committee ~~meetings attended,~~meeting attended. On September 5, 2012, each director was granted a restricted stock unit award with respect to 588 shares of the Company's common stock. It is anticipated that annual directors' fees going forward will include an annual grant of restricted stock units. Messrs. Nelson, Gulling, Olafson, and ~~$400 for other committee meetings attended. Company employees~~Winterbottom do not receive ~~directors’ fees.~~directors fees, including the restricted stock units granted to directors.

The Chairs of the Audit and Compensation Committee receive an additional meeting fee of $100. If there are multiple meetings on one day, the maximum fee paid will be the highest fee for one meeting.

~~Directors of the Company are eligible to receive grants of restricted stock under the Restricted Stock Compensation Plan. However, no awards have ever been made under the Plan.~~

The following table sets forth all compensation earned or paid to ~~the~~our directors for services rendered in the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2009.~~2012.


Name	Fees Paid by Company		Fees Paid by Subsidiary		All Other Compensation (1)		Total		Fees Earned or Paid in Cash by Company ($)		Fees Earned or Paid in Cash by West Bank ($)		Stock Awards ($) (1)		All Other Compensation ($) (2)		Total ($)
Frank W. Berlin	$	20,000	$	17,500	$	-	$	37,500	$	19,100	$	18,500	$	6,000	$	—	$	43,600
Thomas A. Carlstrom		7,500		17,650		1,378		26,528	15,000		20,000		6,000		2,256		43,256
Joyce A. Chapman		14,500		10,550		-		25,050	13,800		13,000		6,000		—		32,800
Orville E. Crowley		13,500		4,775		3,079		21,354
Steven K. Gaer									18,400		18,000		6,000		—		42,400
Kaye R. Lozier		9,500		12,600		-		22,100	14,100		15,500		6,000		—		35,600
David R. Milligan (2)		-		2,575		-		2,575
David R. Milligan									71,000		19,500		6,000		—		96,500
George D. Milligan		20,400		16,550		400		37,350	16,500		18,500		6,000		400		41,400
James W. Noyce		3,100		3,425		-		6,525	16,700		14,000		6,000		—		36,700
Robert G. Pulver		20,900		17,500		480		38,880	18,400		17,500		6,000		480		42,380
Jack G. Wahlig		18,300		11,500		480		30,280
Connie Wimer		17,300		10,550		1,026		28,876
Lou Ann Sandburg									15,600		14,000		6,000		—		35,600


(1)	The amounts set forth in the "Stock Awards" column reflect the grant date fair value of restricted stock units awarded on September 5, 2012, valued in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Each non-employee director was granted 588 restricted stock units which have a vesting date of April 25, 2013. These were the only outstanding non-employee director equity awards as of December 31, 2012.


(2)	All other compensation consists of fees normally charged by the West Bank ~~Trust Department,~~trust department, which were waived for directors.

~~(2)~~

~~Received compensation for attending two West Bank meetings and one West Bank quarterly retainer, prior to becoming an employee in February 2009.~~

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Executive Officers

The following table contains the shares of the Company's common stock beneficially owned by each director, director nominee, and named executive officer listed in the Summary Compensation Table, and all directors and executive officers of the Company and ~~subsidiaries~~subsidiary (including named executive officers) as a group. The ownership information is as of ~~March 1, 2010.~~February 21, 2013.

Name

Shares Beneficially Owned (1) (2)

Percent of Total Shares Outstanding

Shares Beneficially Owned (1) (2)

Percent of Total Shares Outstanding

Frank W. Berlin

46,856

50,856

Thomas A. Carlstrom

37,997

Joyce A. Chapman (3)

Orville E. Crowley (4)

133,258

Thomas A. Carlstrom ⁽³⁾

40,997

Joyce A. Chapman ⁽⁴⁾

28,224

Steven K. Gaer

1,000

Michael J. Gerdin

—

Douglas R. Gulling

19,458

25,999

Kaye R. Lozier

2,920

3,020

Sean P. McMurray

7,000

David R. Milligan

11,654

25,709

George D. Milligan

3,500

7,500

David D. Nelson

45,830

James W. Noyce

1,000

3,000

Robert G. Pulver (5) (6)

72,845

Jack G. Wahlig

4,000

Connie Wimer

28,848

Brad L. Winterbottom

13,621

Executive officers and directors

as a group (14 persons)

375,957

2.16%

Harlee N. Olafson

7,266

Robert G. Pulver ⁽⁵⁾

79,459

Lou Ann Sandburg

1,250

Brad L. Winterbottom ⁽⁶⁾

22,525

Phillip Jason Worth

—

Executive officers and directors

as a group (17 persons)

349,635

2.01

*Indicates less than 1% ownership of outstanding shares.


(1)	Shares “beneficially owned” include shares owned by or for, among others, the spouse and/or minor children of the named individual and any other relative who has the same home address as such individual, as well as other shares with respect to which the named individual has or shares voting or investment power. Beneficial ownership may be disclaimed as to certain of the shares.


(2)	Except as otherwise indicated in the following notes, each named individual owns his or her shares directly, or indirectly through a self-directed IRA or the ~~Company’s~~Company's Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan, and has sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares.

~~(3)~~	~~Ms.~~
(3)	Includes Dr. Carlstrom's shares held in his spouse's name. Dr. Carlstrom disclaims any beneficial ownership of 3,000 shares held in his spouse's name.


(4)	Includes Mrs. Chapman's shares held in her spouse's name. Mrs. Chapman disclaims any beneficial ownership of 28,224 shares held in her ~~spouse’s~~spouse's name.

~~(4)~~
(5)	Includes Mr. ~~Crowley disclaims any beneficial ownership of 297,675~~Pulver's shares held in his ~~spouse’s~~spouse's name.

~~(5)~~

Mr. Pulver disclaims any beneficial ownership of 6,614 shares held in his ~~spouse’s~~spouse's name.

~~(6)~~	~~59,875~~
(6)	Includes Mr. Winterbottom's shares held in his spouse's name. Mr. Winterbottom disclaims any beneficial ownership of ~~Mr. Pulver’s~~6,000 shares ~~are pledged as security.~~held in his spouse's name.

Other Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth certain information on each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner ~~as of March 1, 2010,~~ of more than ~~five percent~~5% of the ~~Company’s Common and Preferred Stock.~~

Name and Address Shares Beneficially Owned Percent of Total Shares Outstanding

Common Stock:

The Jay Newlin Trust
6165 NW 86th Street
Johnston, IA 50131
1,041,952
     5.99%

American Equity Investment Life Holding Company
5000 Westown Parkway, Suite 440
West Des Moines, IA 50266
1,440,592
    8.28%

Preferred Stock:

U.S. Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20220
     36,000
100.00%

Company's common stock. The ownership information is as of February 21, 2013.



Name and Address	Shares Beneficially Owned	Percent of Total Shares Outstanding

The Jay Newlin Trust 6165 NW 86^th Street Johnston, IA 50131	1,041,952	5.99	%

American Equity Investment Life Holding Company 6000 Westown Parkway West Des Moines, IA 50266	1,440,592	8.28	%

~~Section~~Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the ~~Securities~~ Exchange Act ~~of 1934~~ requires that the Company's directors and executive officers and persons who own more than ~~ten percent~~10% of the Company's common stock file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes of ownership with the SEC and Nasdaq. Reporting persons are required by ~~the~~ SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. The Company has not received any Section 16(a) form indicating that any one person owns more than ~~ten percent~~10% of the ~~Company’s~~Company's stock and the Company does not know of any one ~~Shareholder~~stockholder who owns more than ~~ten percent~~10% of the ~~Company’s~~Company's stock. Based solely on its review of the copies of Section 16(a) forms received from its directors and executive officers and written representations that no ~~ot her~~other reports were required, the Company believes that all Section 16(a) reports applicable to its directors and officers during ~~2009~~2012 were ~~filed.~~filed, with four exceptions. Messrs. Gulling, Nelson, and Winterbottom each filed one late form, which involved one late transaction, and all were related to a grant of RSUs. Mr. Nelson filed one late form which involved four late transactions, all of which related to dividends reinvested in common stock held within two brokerage accounts.

Change in Control Agreements

The Company does not know of any arrangements ~~including~~or pledges that would result in a future change in control of the Company.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

~~EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~Compensation Discussion and Analysis

~~Compensation~~This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides information about our compensation objectives and policies for our named executive officers. It explains the structure and rationale of the various elements of compensation for our named executive officers. Our CD&A is organized as follows:

Overview and Executive Summary. We provide some background and highlights to put the overall disclosure in perspective.

Objectives of Our Compensation Program. The objectives of our executive compensation program are based on our business model and the competitive pressures we face in attempting to attract and retain executive talent. We structure our executive compensation program to reflect our compensation philosophy and related operating principles.

Consideration of 2012 Say-on-Pay. The 2012 advisory vote on executive compensation resulted in approximately 96% of the votes cast in favor of our compensation programs for our named executive officers.

Elements of Compensation. There are several components that make up our compensation program, including base salary, annual bonuses and equity awards. We emphasize elements of compensation that tie executive compensation to performance.

Compensation Process. We regularly review our executive compensation programs to ensure that we are meeting the needs of the Company, West Bank, and our stockholders.

Analysis of 2012 Compensation. We set forth our analysis of 2012 compensation decisions and explain why the compensation for our named executive officers in 2012 reflected our compensation objectives and performance.

Regulatory Considerations. We describe the impact of guidance established by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC") and other bank regulatory agencies, in addition to various other regulatory requirements, on our decisions regarding our executive compensation.

Share Ownership and Retention Guidelines. We require our named executive officers to maintain a significant equity interest in our Company. Our ownership and retention guidelines are explained.

Overview and Executive Summary

Financial and Operational Performance.

The ~~Company’s~~Company, through West Bank, provides lending, deposit, and trust services for individuals and businesses. We offer competitive personal and commercial banking products and are committed to providing superior customer service. We place a high priority on community service and are actively involved with many civic and community projects where we conduct business. We operate in an intensely competitive and uncertain business environment. From a business perspective, not only do we compete with numerous companies in our markets for customers, but we also compete with many different types and sizes of organizations for senior leadership capable of executing our business strategies during varying economic conditions. Among other challenges, our business model requires experienced leaders with banking and operational expertise who are capable of taking on high levels of personal responsibility.

The fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, was considered a very good year for the Company and West Bank. After repaying our U.S. Department of the Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program ("TARP") financial assistance in 2011, we established a goal of financial performance in the top quartile of our benchmarking peer group. A few highlights of 2012 performance include:

Return on average assets: 1.21%

Return on average equity: 12.34%

Efficiency ratio: 50.83%

Texas ratio: 11.25%

Moreover, the Company returned to a level of profitability that puts us in the top quartile of bank holding companies in the United States with assets between $1 billion and $3 billion (according to the September 2012 Bank Holding Company Performance Report). In addition, the Company was recognized by the investment banking firm, Sandler, O'Neill + Partners, L.P., as one of the top 25 community banks in the country and was included as one of "The 50 Best Users of Capital" by the magazine Bank Director.

Summary of Our Executive Compensation Programs.

The Company and West Bank share an executive management team. The members of the executive management team, including the named executive officers, are compensated by West Bank not by the Company. The compensation packages of the named executive officers are determined and approved by the Compensation Committee based on their performance and roles for both the Company and West Bank.

The Company and West Bank are committed to paying for performance. We believe this commitment is reflected in the fact that a significant amount of our named executive officers' compensation is provided through programs in which the amounts ultimately received vary to reflect our performance. Our executive compensation programs evolve and are adjusted over time to support the business goals of the Company and West Bank and to promote both the near- and long-term profitable growth of the Company and West Bank. Total compensation for each named executive officer varies with the Company's and West Bank's performance in achieving financial and non-financial objectives and with individual performance. Prior to 2012, our named executive officers were compensated almost exclusively through their annual base salaries due to the TARP program executive compensation restrictions and prohibitions. As the Company repaid its TARP financial assistance in 2011, the Compensation Committee in 2012 reviewed and reconsidered our executive compensation programs in light of the fact that the TARP compensation restrictions and prohibitions no longer applied to us.

During 2012, our Compensation Committee again retained an independent compensation consultant, F.W. Cook, to review our executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee made several changes to our executive compensation programs that were, in part, based on the review by F.W. Cook. F.W. Cook helped us to identify a peer group of 16 financial institutions that are similar in regional presence, asset size, and business model, which we have used to compare our executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee approved the adoption, and our stockholders approved the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, pursuant to which the Company is now able to use equity incentive awards to align the compensation of our named executive officers with the long-term interests of our stockholders by focusing our named executive officers on the performance of our stock and returns to our stockholders. Our Compensation Committee also approved new employment agreements for our named executive officers. The agreements include provisions that are intended to let our named executive officers focus on discharging their responsibilities by aligning their individual best interests with the Company's and West Bank's best interests. Additionally, the agreements include restrictive covenants protective of the Company that would apply in certain circumstances following the respective officer's separation from service with the Company. Finally, our Compensation Committee adopted a deferred compensation plan intended to help our named executive officers plan for their financial futures.

Based on our disclosures in our 2012 proxy, we received a 96% favorable say-on-pay vote. The Compensation Committee believes that this positive result is reflective of our stockholders' approval of our executive compensation programs. While this vote was with respect to our compensation programs in effect prior to the 2012 changes described in this CD&A, the Compensation Committee believes that the changes described this year are consistent with our compensation philosophy and objectives.

Objectives of Our Compensation Program

Our compensation program goal is to create superior long-term value for our investors by attracting, motivating, and retaining outstanding employees who not only serve our customers but who also generate financial performances better than our competitors and other peers. Our compensation program for executives is based on our business needs and challenges in creating stockholder value. To support the achievement of our business strategies and goals, we strive to:

Tie compensation to performance;

Provide equity compensation tied to long-term value for stockholders;

Align executives' financial interests with those of stockholders;

Support the Company's values, strategy, and development of employees;

Foster a team approach among top executives;

Attract, retain, and align leaders capable of delivering superior business results;

Provide competitive cash compensation and benefits opportunities; and

Adhere to the highest legal and ethical standards.

Elements of Compensation

Our executive compensation program consists of several elements, each with an objective that fits into our overall compensation program. In 2011, the Compensation Committee conducted, with the assistance of F.W. Cook, a comprehensive review of our executive compensation program in light of trends in market practice, recent regulatory developments, peer group, and internal considerations. In 2012, the Compensation Committee again retained F.W. Cook to continue to review and monitor our executive compensation program in light of trends in market practice, regulatory developments, peer group, and internal considerations. As a result, various aspects of the program were modified, with some such modifications first becoming effective in 2012. The following overview explains the structure and rationale of the elements of compensation used for ~~its~~2012.

Base Salary

We consider base salary as a tool to provide executives with a reasonable level of fixed income relative to the responsibility of the positions they hold. The Compensation Committee reviews each named executive officer's base salary annually, as well as at the time of a promotion or other change in responsibility. Base salaries are established and adjusted using criteria that include the level of responsibility for the position, base salary data for other internal positions, and base salaries for similar positions at financial institutions in our peer group. In considering the practices of our peer group, we target base salaries to be competitive when compared to our peer group companies.

Annual Incentive Bonus

Annual cash bonuses are another important piece of total compensation for our named executive officers ~~has~~because they are intended to support and encourage the ~~following general objectives:~~achievement of our business goals and strategies by tying a meaningful portion of compensation to financial results for the year as compared to internal and external standards. Opportunities are capped to avoid encouraging excessive risk-taking and to avoid any focus on maximizing short-term results at the expense of long-term soundness.

·	~~Create shareholder value by helping the Company attract and retain outstanding and motivated executives who substantially contribute to the long-term success of the Company;~~

As a result of the Compensation Committee's review of the Company's compensation program, bonuses for named executive officers for 2012 will be determined based on quantitative and qualitative analyses. The quantitative analysis includes the Company's relative performance with respect to return on assets, return on equity, the efficiency ratio, and the Texas ratio against its peer group. The qualitative analysis includes any and all items deemed relevant by the Committee including, for example, regulatory action and changes in dividends. The Committee may increase or decrease the bonuses indicated from the peer comparison as it sees fit in its discretion, with all determinations by the Committee being final. Positive Company earnings are required for any bonuses to be paid to named executive officers.

The quantitative analysis has two parts: (1) performance against our peer group in four key areas; and (2) the Company's net profit compared to the prior year with positive earnings required for any bonuses to be paid to our named executive officers. The four key areas, each of which is equally weighted, in which we measure our performance against our peer group are return on average assets, return on average equity, efficiency ratio, and Texas ratio. These ratios were selected because the Committee believes they encompass the important aspects of financial performance: earnings, capital levels, expense control, and asset quality. Based on our ranking among our peers in each of these four key areas, our named executive officers are eligible for a cash bonus payment equal to:

·
	Provide the executives fair market rate total compensation for successfully implementing the Company’s objectives and assisting the Board in developing and implementing successful strategic plans for the Company; and

· Level	~~Align the long-term best interests of the Company, its shareholders, and its executives.~~Peer Ranking	% Salary
	Above 75^th Percentile	60%
Maximum	75^th Percentile	60%
Target	Median	40%
Threshold	25^th Percentile	20%
	Below 25^th Percentile	—

~~Important~~If our ranking in the peer group falls between any of the listed points, the named executive officers will be eligible for a proportional cash bonus.

Long-Term Stock Incentives

Equity compensation is the other key element of the total compensation program for our named executive officers. It is our intent to use the West Bancorporation, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2012 Plan), which authorizes various types of long-term incentive awards, in driving the creation of long-term value for stockholders, attracting and retaining executives capable of effectively executing our business strategies, and structuring compensation to account for the time horizons of risks. We are including equity compensation because it supports the achievement of many of our key compensation objectives:

Tie pay to performance by linking compensation to stockholder value creation.

Align executives' interests with those of stockholders.

Attract executives, particularly those interested in building long-term value for stockholders, as equity compensation is an element of competitive pay packages for executives.

Retain executives and reward future service by providing for forfeiture of awards prior to satisfaction of multi-year service requirements.

Retirement Benefits

Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in our Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan which is intended to assist executives as well as all eligible employees in providing for income and financial security in retirement. Executives participate under the same terms as other eligible employees. During 2012, this plan provided for a 100% Company matching contribution on participant deferrals up to 6% of the participant's pay and an additional 4% discretionary Company contribution (in each case subject to applicable IRS limitations on contributions).

Deferred Compensation

We adopted the West Bancorporation, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan in October 2012, effective as of January 1, 2013, to provide certain individuals with additional deferral opportunities in planning for their retirements. The Deferred Compensation Plan is an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan and provides an opportunity for eligible participants, including directors and key officers of the Company and its subsidiary (including the named executive officers), to voluntarily defer receipt of a portion of their cash compensation. Each eligible individual makes his or her own decision with respect to participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan. The Company and West Bank have the right to make discretionary contributions under the Deferred Compensation Plan on behalf of participants, though we currently have no intention of making such contributions. Compensation deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan will be payable on a date or dates selected by each participant at the time of enrollment. In the event of a change in control of the Company, any amounts deferred by a participant will be distributed in a lump sum and any Company contributions will be distributed in accordance with the participant's elections. The Deferred Compensation Plan currently provides for a notional interest rate equal to the Moody's Seasoned Aaa Corporate Bond Rate as in effect as of January 1 of the applicable year. As of January 1, 2013, no individuals had chosen to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan.

Perquisites and Other Benefits

We have generally avoided the use of perquisites and other types of non-cash benefits. Our named executive officers participate in our employee benefit programs on the same terms as other eligible employees. Car allowances and reimbursement of club dues were provided on a selective basis in the past, but were eliminated at the beginning of 2012 in an effort to streamline the program, reflect general trends in practice, and focus on compensation tied to performance.

Employment Agreements

During 2012, we entered into new employment agreements with each of our named executive officers that set forth key terms of employment for each such officer. We believe employment agreements help us recruit and retain executives with the experience, skills, knowledge, and background needed to achieve our business goals and strategy.

Mr. Nelson. Mr. Nelson will serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as the Chief Executive Officer of West Bank under his agreement, as well as a member of the board of directors of both entities. The initial term under Mr. Nelson's agreement ends on December 31, 2015, but the agreement renews automatically for one-year terms on January 1, 2015, and on each January 1 thereafter. Mr. Nelson is entitled to a minimum annual salary pursuant to the agreement, as well as annual performance bonuses and participation in the Company's benefit plans. Under the agreement, upon an involuntary termination of Mr. Nelson's employment, he will be entitled to severance benefits contingent upon his execution of a general release of claims. Under the agreement, Mr. Nelson will be subject to non-compete and non-solicit restrictive covenants following the termination of his employment.

Messrs. Gulling, Olafson, and Winterbottom. Under their respective agreements, Mr. Gulling will serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and Chief Financial Officer of West Bank, Mr. Olafson will serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of the Company and West Bank, and Mr. Winterbottom will serve as Executive Vice President of the Company and President of West Bank. Each individual will also serve as a member of the board of directors of West Bank. The initial term under each agreement ends on December 31, 2014, but the agreements renew automatically for one-year terms on January 1, 2014 and on each January 1 thereafter. Messrs. Gulling, Olafson, and Winterbottom are each entitled to a minimum annual salarypursuant to their agreements, as well as annual performance bonuses and participation in the Company's benefit plans. Under the agreements, upon an involuntary termination of the respective executive's employment, the executive will be entitled to severance benefits contingent upon his execution of a general release of claims. Under the agreements, Messrs. Gulling, Olafson, and Winterbottom will be subject to non-compete and non-solicit restrictive covenants following termination of employment.

2012 Equity Incentive Plan - Acceleration of Awards

The 2012 Plan provides for possible accelerated vesting of awards granted to all participants, including our named executive officers, in certain circumstances. Under the 2012 Plan, and to the extent not provided otherwise in the agreements setting forth the terms of the award, vesting will be accelerated for outstanding awards upon a “change in control” of the Company (as defined in the 2012 Plan) if the awards are not assumed or otherwise equitably converted into comparable awards by the acquiring company. If the awards are assumed by the acquiror and a participant's employment is terminated without “cause” or a participant resigns for “good reason,” the participant's awards will become vested (this is what is known as a “double trigger” approach). We adopted this approach, rather than providing for vesting solely upon a change in control (a “single trigger” approach) because we believe that the double trigger provides adequate employment protection and reduces potential costs associated with various strategic transactions for the benefit of the stockholders. Further, the award agreements under the 2012 Plan generally provide that vesting will be accelerated for outstanding awards upon the respective participant's disability or death.

No Tax Gross-Ups

Under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, an executive may be subject to excise taxes on certain benefits received in relation to a change in control of the Company. While many companies provide excise tax gross-ups to executives to place the executive in the same tax position as if the excise tax did not apply, we do not believe it is appropriate to provide this type of protection to any executive.

Compensation Process

The Compensation Committee has broad discretion in overseeing our compensation programs. It reviews each element of compensation for each of our named executive officers at least once each year and makes a final determination regarding any adjustments to their current compensation structure and levels after considering a number of factors. The Compensation Committee takes into account the scope of the named executive officer's responsibilities, performance and experience, as well as competitive compensation levels in reviewing compensation. During the annual review process, the Compensation Committee also reviews our full-year financial results against other banking organizations and reviews the structure of our compensation programs relative to sound risk management.

In particular, our executive compensation decisions consider several factors ~~considered~~of which the primary are:

Key financial measurements;

Strategic initiatives related to our business;

Achievement of specific operational goals relating to the executive's area of oversight;

Compensation of other Company executives; and

Compensation of peer group executives.

Consulting Assistance

Under its charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to retain its own compensation consultants. In July 2011, the Compensation Committee retained F.W. Cook to provide the Compensation Committee with independent, objective analysis and professional opinions on executive compensation matters. F.W. Cook is independent, reports directly to the Chair of the Compensation Committee, and performs no other work for the Company. During 2011, F.W. Cook assisted the Committee in the review of the total compensation program, including gathering and analyzing market data for compensation paid for similar positions at companies with which we compete for executive talent. F.W. Cook also provided input on marketplace trends and best practices relating to competitive pay levels, as well as developments in regulatory and technical matters. During 2012, the Compensation Committee again retained F.W. Cook to continue to review and monitor our executive compensation program in light of trends in market practice, regulatory developments, and internal considerations.

Role of Executive Officers

Various members of management facilitate the Compensation Committee's consideration of compensation for our named executive officers by providing information for the Committee's review. This includes, among other items, financial results and analysis, performance evaluations, compensation provided to our named executive officers, technical and regulatory considerations, and input on program design and possible modifications.

Market Benchmarking

Market pay practices are one of many factors we consider in setting executive pay levels and designing compensation programs. In 2011, we gathered information on pay levels and practices for a group of publicly traded companies selected based on their business focus, scope and location of operations, size, and other considerations. A group of 12 benchmark companies was jointly selected by our Consultant and management and approved by the Compensation Committee ~~while pursuing~~in 2011. In January 2012, four additional companies were added to the ~~Company’s compensation objectives include:~~group at the Compensation Committee's direction. The Company's peer group consists of 16 financial institutions, as listed below, that are similar in regional presence, asset size, and business model. The Company is in the middle of the group in terms of size.

·
	~~The financial performance of the Company based on a comparison of actual net income to budgeted net income;~~

· BankFinancial Corporation

~~Returns on assets and equity exceeding the returns of peers by a predetermined percentage; and~~Horizon Bancorp

MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.

· Baylake Corp.	~~Leadership, community involvement, and overall quality of contribution to the strategic success of the Company and the advancement of the financial interests of its shareholders.~~Isabella Bank Corporation	MutualFirst Financial, Inc.
CFS Bancorp, Inc.	Macatawa Bank Corporation	NASB Financial, Inc.
Firstbank Corporation	Mercantile Bank Corporation	Pulaski Financial Corp.
First Mid-Illinois Bancshares, Inc.	MetroCorp Bancshares, Inc	QCR Holdings, Inc.
Hills Bancorporation

~~With~~The companies in the group will be reviewed and evaluated on a regular basis.

Analysis of 2012 Compensation

Consistent with our philosophy of linking compensation to performance, compensation for our named executive officers in 2012 was based on our business results. As noted above, the Company returned to a level of profitability that puts us in the top quartile of bank holding companies in the United States with assets between $1 billion and $3 billion (according to the September 2012 Bank Holding Company Performance Report). This section discusses the compensation actions that were taken in 2012 for our named executive officers, as reported in the Executive Compensation section below.

Base Salary

Salaries for our named executive officers for 2012 were set as follows in light of the factors mentioned above: Mr. Nelson - $350,000; Mr. Gulling - $247,000; Mr. Olafson - $247,000; and Mr. Winterbottom - $247,000. Salaries for 2013 remain at 2012 levels.

Annual Incentive Bonus

For 2012, the maximum bonus percentage for our named executive officers was increased to 60% of base salary in light of historical market practices, the Company's performance, and the continuing development of the executive team.

Based on peer group analysis using September 30, 2012 data, we believe Company results likely will be at or above the 75th percentile of our peer group. As such, we believe our named executive officers will be eligible to receive a cash bonus with respect to 2012. However, because the ultimate amount of the cash bonus is based on the Company's performance compared to that of the peer groups for the entire year and the Committee's qualitative analysis, the amount of the cash bonus payments will not be known until after the peer group institutions have reported their financial results for 2012.

Long-Term Stock Incentives

During 2012, our Compensation Committee made two separate equity grants to our named executive officers comprised solely of restricted stock units. The first grant, made in May 2012, was a one-time grant intended to bring our equity compensation pay practices more in line with market practice and our peer group. In part, this grant was also intended to provide our named executive officers with compensation they could have earned during the TARP period even after applying the TARP compensation limitations. The Committee chose to wait until after we were out of TARP to make these ~~objectives~~awards. On June 29, 2011, we redeemed all of the preferred stock that we sold to the Treasury pursuant to TARP. The May 2012 grant was in the form of restricted stock units and ~~factors serving~~the terms of the grant are intended to satisfy those portions of the TARP compensation rules that otherwise would have applied had the grant been made as a ~~foundation,~~long-term incentive under the TARP compensation rules during the TARP period. The May 2012 grant will vest in full in May 2014.

The second equity grant was made in August 2012 when Mr. Nelson was awarded 8,233 restricted stock units and Messrs. Gulling, Olafson, and Winterbottom each received 5,810 restricted stock units. This grant was intended to be an annual equity award with respect to 2012 and is intended to be a part of a broader annual award program pursuant to which the Compensation Committee can continue to further align our named executive officers' interests with those of our stockholders. The equity awards were in the form of restricted stock units vesting in annual installments tied to continued service over a period of five years. This approach is designed to align executives' interests with the interests of stockholders, provide a long-term planning horizon, mitigate excessive risk-taking, and retain participants by providing a compensation package that is competitive.

We also anticipate granting equity awards for 2013.

Regulatory Considerations

As a publicly traded financial institution, the Company ~~through its~~must contend with several often overlapping layers of regulations when considering and implementing compensation-related decisions. These regulations do not set specific parameters within which compensation decisions must be made, but do require the Company and the Compensation Committee to be mindful of the risks that often go hand-in-hand with compensation programs designed to incentivize the achievement of better than average performance. While the regulatory focus on risk assessment has been heightened over the last several years, the incorporation of general concepts of risk assessment into compensation decisions is not a recent development.

Under its long-standing Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness, the FDIC has held that excessive compensation is prohibited as an unsafe and unsound practice. In describing a framework within which to make a determination as to whether compensation is to be considered excessive, the FDIC has indicated that financial institutions should consider whether aggregate cash amounts paid, or noncash benefits provided, to employees are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an employee. The FDIC encourages financial institutions to review an employee's compensation history and to consider internal pay equity, and, as appropriate, to consider benchmarking compensation to peer groups. Finally, the FDIC provides that such an assessment must be made in light of the institution's overall financial condition.

In the summer of 2010, the various financial institution regulatory agencies worked together to issue additional guidance, Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies, that was, in many respects, intended to serve as a complement to the Safety and Soundness standards. As its title would imply, the joint agency guidance sets forth a framework for assessing the soundness of incentive compensation plans, programs, and arrangements maintained by financial institutions. The joint agency guidance is narrower in scope than the Safety and Soundness standards because it applies only to senior executive officers and those other individuals who, either alone or as a group, could pose a material risk to the institution. With respect to those identified individuals, the joint agency guidance is intended to focus the institution's attention on balanced risk-taking incentives, compatibility with effective controls, and risk management, ~~seeks~~with a focus on general principles of strong corporate governance.

Also, once further risk assessment guidelines and procedures, as required under the Dodd-Frank Act, are finalized by the financial institution regulatory agencies and the SEC, the Company expects that it will also be subject to ~~reward positive results, leadership, innovation,~~those further guidelines and ~~entrepreneurship by~~procedures. However, initial guidance respecting the Dodd-Frank Act risk assessment guidelines and procedures was issued during 2011 and, in large part that guidance restates the frameworks set forth in the Safety and Soundness standards and joint agency guidance described above.

Finally, in addition to the foregoing, as a publicly traded corporation, the Company is also subject to the SEC's rules regarding risk assessment. Those rules require a publicly traded company to determine whether any of its existing incentive compensation plans, programs, or arrangements creates risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. We do not believe that our incentive compensation plans, programs, or arrangements create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Compensation Committee believes that a sensible approach to balancing risk-taking and rewarding reasonable, but not necessarily easily attainable, goals has always been a component of its overall assessment of the compensation plans, programs, and arrangements it has established for the Company's named executive officers. In this regard, the Compensation Committee has revisited the components of the frameworks set forth in the Safety and Soundness standards and the joint agency guidance as an effective tool for conducting its own assessment of the balance between risk and reward built into the Company's compensation programs for named executive officers. In addition, the Committee continues to anticipate final guidance under the Dodd-Frank Act and will be prepared to incorporate into its risk assessment procedures any new guidelines and procedures as may be necessary or appropriate.

In making decisions about executive compensation, in addition to the above, we also consider the impact of other regulatory provisions, including the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Code limiting the tax deductibility of certain compensation unless it is considered performance-based under Section 409A of the Code regarding nonqualified deferred compensation, and the change-in-control provisions of Section 280G of the Code. In making decisions about executive compensation, we also consider how various elements of compensation will impact our financial results. For example, we consider the impact of FASB ASC Topic 718, which requires us to recognize the compensation cost of grants of equity awards based upon the grant date fair value of those awards.

Share Ownership and Retention Guidelines

We believe that our named executive officers and non-employee directors should have a significant equity interest in the Company. To promote such equity ownership and further align the interests of our executives and directors with our stockholders, we adopted share retention and ownership guidelines for our named executive officers equal to three times salary and for our directors equal to three times annual cash retainer. Until the stock ownership guidelines are met, the executives and directors are expected to retain 50% of any applicable shares received (on a net after tax basis) under our equity compensation program. The program is subject to periodic review by the Compensation Committee.

The Company has ~~historically favored annual performance-based cash compensation over deferred cash or equity compensation. A material aspect~~had in place for several years an insider trading policy that permits open market transactions in Company stock beginning 48 hours after quarterly earnings have been made public until the 10th day of ~~that preference has been that~~ the ~~overall compensation levels for~~third month in the ~~Company's~~quarter. In addition, our named executive officers were such that the Board believed it was fair to pay all bonuses in cash so the executives could immediately use the compensation as they saw fit. Before 2009, annual compensation for the named executive officers consisted of base salary, cash incentive bonuses, and traditional executive benefits, including profit sharingmay purchase Company stock through ~~the Company’s~~payroll deductions under our Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan.

~~No bonuses were paid~~ Changes to the named executive officers in or for 2009 due to the Company's net income performance and the deteriorating value of its stock, including the reduction and ultimate cessation of the common stock dividend. Furthermore, the only bonuses awarded any employee for 2009 performance consisted of approximately $61,000 that was accrued but not spent for 2008 bonuses. The awards were made to selected mid-level West Bank officers and staff. Most employee salaries were not increased for 2010. The Company believes that the West Bank employees' general acceptance of the 2009 decisions to significantly limit bonuses and forego pay increases is a significant indication of commitment to the Company and its shareholders. This commitment illustrates the Company's core princi ple that its shareholders and employees have common interests that should be reflected in common rewards and sacrifices.

The executive compensation process is that the independent directors of the Board make the ultimate compensation determinations, as allowed by Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(d), based on recommendations by the Board's Compensation Committee. The Committee considers whether the Company’s compensation program is adequately competitive with other similar financial service businesses and monitors the financial performance of the Company and the contributions of the senior executives. The Committee has previously used peer group analysis and compensation consultants while working on executive compensation. However, neither peer group analysis nor a consultant was used in 2009 because of the unprecedented adverse financial experience of the Company.

Base salaries for Messrs. Stanberry, Gulling, and Winterbottom were determined for 2009 by the terms of their employment agreements. Copies of those agreements are filed as exhibits to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 23, 2008, which may be viewed on the Company's website (www.westbankiowa.com), Investor Relations, SEC Filings. Base salariespurchases under the agreements are reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committee and may be increased, but not decreased. Base salaries were not increased for 2009 or 2010 due to the Company's performance. Mr. Milligan's annual base salary of $250,000 was negotiated when he assumed the interim chief executive officer position in July 2009. Payments of club dues for Messrs. Stanberry, Gulling, and Winterbottom were made in accordance with their employment agreements. The Company made 2009 401(k) contribution matches, but no profit sharing payments, to the Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan ~~for Messrs. Milligan, Stanberry, Gulling, and Winterbottom.~~may only be done during the period when open market transactions are permitted. The Company also gave all employees the option of receiving cash for their accrued vacation time, which had already been expensed. Messrs. Gulling and Winterbottom exercised this option and were paid $26,250 and $24,231 respectively. Mr. Stanberry was paid for his accrued vacation time when he resigned. Finally, term life insurance benefits were provided to all of the executives through a program that is available to all employees.

~~Looking forward, the Compensation Committee is currently evaluating the possibility of making long-term restricted stock grants to the~~insider trading policy requires named executive officers ~~and other senior officers of West Bank under~~to request approval prior to entering into any hedging transactions involving the Company's Restricted Stock Compensation Plan. That Plan was approved by the shareholders in 2005, but has not been used due to the Company's historic preference for cash incentive bonuses. Long-term restricted stock incentive bonuses are currently the only incentive compensation allowed under the Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) rules for the Company's five most highly compensated employees, which would include all of its named executive officers.securities.

~~Summary~~Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information concerning total compensation earned or paid ~~to those serving as the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the other most highly compensated executive officer of the Company~~ for services rendered in the year ended December 31, ~~2009.~~2012, to those serving as our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and our other most highly compensated executive policymaking officers (of which we had two). These ~~four~~gentlemen were the Company's named executive officers ~~are referred to~~during 2012. Compensation for 2011 and 2010 is also presented for these gentlemen, as ~~the Named Executive Officers~~they were our named executive officers in ~~this proxy statement.~~

those years as well. In ~~2009,~~2012, West Bank, rather than the Company, paid Messrs. ~~Milligan, Stanberry,~~Nelson, Gulling, Olafson, and Winterbottom.

Name and Principal Positions Year Salary Bonus
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation (2)

All Other
Compensation (3)
Total
David R. Milligan 2009 $ 163,611 $ - $ - $ 7,402 $ 171,013
Chief Executive Officer of the Company;
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of West Bank

Thomas E. Stanberry (4)
2009 $ 137,500 $ - $ - $ 49,904 $ 187,404
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company; 2008 250,000 5,000 (1) - 20,723 275,723
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of West Bank; 2007 250,000 5,000 (1) 210,000 25,228 490,228

Douglas R. Gulling 2009 $ 210,000 $ - $ - $ 39,797 $ 249,797
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company; 2008 210,000 4,200 (1) - 16,915 231,115
Director and Chief Financial Officer of West Bank; 2007 200,000 4,000 (1) 35,000 18,781 257,781

Brad L. Winterbottom 2009 $ 210,000 $ - $ - $ 41,332 $ 251,332
Executive Vice President of the Company; 2008 210,000 4,200 (1) - 22,573 236,773
Director and President of West Bank; 2007 200,000 4,000 (1) 70,000 25,598 299,598



Name and Principal Positions	Year	Salary (1)		Bonus (2)				Stock Awards (3)				Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (4)		All Other Compensation (5)		Total (6)
David D. Nelson	2012	$	350,000	$	7,000	(7	)	$	70,000			$	—	$	28,832	$	455,832
President and Chief Executive Officer	2011	275,000		74,250		(8	)	68,750		(8	)	—		36,327		454,327
of the Company;	2010	203,078		125,000				—				—		50,750		378,828
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of West Bank

Douglas R. Gulling	2012	$	247,000	$	4,940	(7	)	$	49,400			$	—	$	30,486	$	331,826
Executive Vice President and Chief	2011	225,000		49,500		(8	)	45,000		(8	)	—		27,010		346,510
Financial Officer of the Company;	2010	214,789		—				—				—		18,603		233,392
Director and Chief Financial Officer
of West Bank

Harlee N. Olafson	2012	$	247,000	$	4,940	(7	)	$	49,400			$	—	$	30,486	$	331,826
Executive Vice President and Chief	2011	210,000		88,200		(8	)	—				—		23,359		321,559
Risk Officer of the Company;	2010	84,000		30,000				—				—		15,877		129,877
Director, Executive Vice President,
and Chief Risk Officer of West Bank

Brad L. Winterbottom	2012	$	247,000	$	4,940	(7	)	$	49,400			$	—	$	30,486	$	331,826
Executive Vice President of the	2011	225,000		49,500		(8	)	45,000		(8	)	—		30,229		349,729
Company;	2010	214,789		—				—				—		22,042		236,831
Director and President of West Bank

~~(1)~~	~~Consists of a holiday bonus equal to two percent of annual~~
(1)	Amounts reflect base salary ~~which is paid to all officers~~earned during the year, before any deferrals, and ~~employees of West Bank.~~including salary increases during the year, if any.


(2)	Amounts are shown in the year ~~accrued.~~earned.


(3)	The amounts set forth in the "Stock Awards" column reflect the grant date fair value of awards granted during the year ended December 31, 2012, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating these amounts are set forth in Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is located on page 86 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(4)

Annual bonuses for 2012 performance cannot be determined until peer company financial information is available. Based upon our results and the results of our peers as of September 30, 2012, annual bonuses for 2012 would be paid out at the following maximum levels: Mr. Nelson - $210,000; Mr. Gulling - $148,200; Mr. Olafson - $148, 200; and Mr. Winterbottom - $148,200. The final determination of amounts earned for 2012 will be made after the companies included in the benchmarking peer group have filed their final results for 2012.

(5)

Consists entirely of contributions made by the Company on behalf of the ~~Named Executive Officer~~named executive officer to the ~~Company’s~~Company's Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan (including 401(k) matches ~~for all years~~ and ~~profit sharing~~discretionary plan contributions for ~~2007 and 2008)~~2012) except for the following amounts for ~~2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively,~~2012, which represent premiums on group term life insurance coverage: ~~Milligan~~Nelson - ~~$858; Stanberry - $978, $897, and $897;~~$1,140; Gulling - ~~$1,367, $1,367, and $781;~~$846; Olafson - $846; and Winterbottom - ~~$731, $731, and $748; club dues~~$846.


(6)	If annual bonuses for ~~Milligan~~2012 are paid out at maximum levels, as reflected in footnote (4) above, the total compensation amounts reflected in this column will be as follows: Mr. Nelson - ~~$0; Stanberry - $2,926, $3,726, and $4,081;~~$665,832; Mr. Gulling - ~~$2,730, $850,~~$480,026; Mr. Olafson - $480,026; and ~~$0; and~~Mr. Winterbottom - ~~$7,001, $7,144,~~$480,026.


(7)	Consists of a holiday bonus equal to 2% of annual salary paid to all officers and ~~$6,850, and paid time off payout in 2009 only: Milligan - $0; Stanberry - $38,942; Gulling - $26,250; Winterbottom - $24,231.~~

~~(4)~~

~~Mr. Stanberry resigned effective July 15, 2009. Mr. Milligan was named interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company and interim Chairman and Chief Executive Officer~~employees of West ~~Bank~~Bank.

(8)

Because we were subject to the TARP limitations for approximately six months of 2011, approximately 50% of annual bonuses for 2011 were paid in cash and the remaining amounts were paid in 2012 in the form of restricted stock units under the 2012 Plan that will vest 100% on ~~the same day.~~May 17, 2014, subject to continued service. Mr. Olafson was not subject to TARP limitations and, therefore, received 100% of his 2011 bonus in cash.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth certain information concerning grants of plan-based awards made to our named executive officers during 2012. All restricted stock unit grants reflected in the table were made under the West Bancorporation, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, which is described in more detail in the CD&A.



				Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Name	Type of Award	Grant Date	Compensation Committee Approval Date	Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Unit Awards ($)
David D. Nelson	Annual Bonus	—	—	$	70,000	$	140,000	$	210,000	—	$	—
	Restricted Stock Units	05/17/12	05/17/12	—		—		—		8,249	68,750
	Restricted Stock Units	08/01/12	07/23/12	—		—		—		8,233	70,000
Douglas R. Gulling	Annual Bonus	—	—	$	49,400	$	98,800	$	148,200	—	—
	Restricted Stock Units	05/17/12	05/17/12	—		—		—		5,399	45,000
	Restricted Stock Units	08/01/12	07/23/12	—		—		—		5,810	49,400
Harlee N. Olafson	Annual Bonus	—	—	$	49,400	$	98,800	$	148,200	—	—
	Restricted Stock Units	08/01/12	07/23/12	—		—		—		5,810	49,400
Brad L. Winterbottom	Annual Bonus	—	—	$	49,400	$	98,800	$	148,200	—	—
	Restricted Stock Units	05/17/12	05/17/12	—		—		—		5,399	45,000
	Restricted Stock Units	08/01/12	07/23/12	—		—		—		5,810	49,400

Annual Bonuses

Annual bonuses for our named executive officers for 2012 will be based on quantitative and qualitative analyses. The quantitative analysis includes the Company's relative performance against a peer group of other banking organizations. The qualitative analysis will include any and all items deemed relevant by the Compensation Committee including, for example, regulatory action and changes in dividends. Based on the Compensation Committee's evaluation, it may increase or decrease the bonuses indicated from the peer comparison as it deems appropriate in its sole discretion, with all determinations by the Committee being final. Positive Company earnings are required for any bonuses to be paid to our named executive officers.

Restricted Stock Units

Because we were subject to the TARP limitations for approximately six months of 2011, approximately 50% of annual bonuses for 2011 were paid in cash and the remaining amounts were paid in 2012 in the form of restricted stock units granted on May 17, 2012 that will vest 100% on May 17, 2014, subject to continued service. These restricted stock units are reflected in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table above for Messrs. Nelson, Gulling, and Winterbottom. Mr. Olafson was not subject to TARP limitations and, therefore, received 100% of his 2011 bonus in cash.

In July 2012, the Compensation Committee approved equity grants for our named executive officers comprised solely of restricted stock units. Mr. Nelson was awarded 8,233 restricted stock units and Messrs. Gulling, Olafson, and Winterbottom each received 5,810 restricted stock units. Each of these grants vest 20% per year subject to continued service.

~~Potential~~

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth information concerning non-vested restricted stock units held as of December 31, 2012, by our named executive officers. Market values for outstanding restricted stock units are based on the closing price of our stock on December 31, 2012 (the last trading day of the year) of $10.78.



	Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
David D. Nelson	16,482 ⁽¹⁾	$	177,676
Douglas R. Gulling	11,209 ⁽²⁾	120,833
Harlee N. Olafson	5,810 ⁽³⁾	62,632
Brad L. Winterbottom	11,209 ⁽²⁾	120,833


(1)	Reflects 8,249 restricted stock units granted on May 17, 2012, which vest fully on May 17, 2014; and 8,233 restricted stock units granted on August 1, 2012, which vest in five equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.


(2)	Reflects 5,399 restricted stock units granted on May 17, 2012, which vest fully on May 17, 2014; and 5,810 restricted stock units that were granted on August 1, 2012, which vest in five equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.


(3)	Reflects 5,810 restricted stock units granted on August 1, 2012, which vest in five equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

As noted above, Messrs. Gulling and Winterbottom have employment agreements with the Company. The contracts provide for various payments in response to termination or change of control events. However, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as amended by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and the Department of the Treasury's Interim Final Rule concerning TARP Standards for Compensation and Corporate Governance suspend the Company's abilities to accrue or pay any golden parachute payment under the employment agreements for so long as the Company has any obligation to the Treasury under the TARP. As part of the TARP application process, Messrs. Gulling and Winterbottom waived any claim against the United States government and the Company related to the TARP impact on their empl oyment agreements. The TARP restrictions on executive compensation were applicable to the Company on December 31, 2009.

The table below ~~shows contract payments~~sets forth the estimated amount of compensation payable to each of the named executive officers upon termination of such officer's employment in the event of (1) the officer's disability or death, (2) termination by the Company without cause or by the officer for good reason, in each case other than in connection with a change in control, and (3) termination by the Company without cause or by the officer for good reason, in each case in connection with a change in control. The amounts shown assume the termination was effective as of December 31, 2012, and that ~~would have been due to Messrs. Gulling and Winterbottom if~~ the ~~TARP restrictions were not in effect and their employment had been terminated~~price of Company stock as of termination was the closing price of $10.78 on December 31, ~~2009,~~2012 (the last trading day of the year). The actual amounts to be paid can be determined only following the named executive officer's termination. We generally do not provide any benefits to our named executive officers solely as a result of a change in control.



Name	Type of Payment	Payments Upon Disability or Death		Payments Upon Termination by the Company without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason-No Change in Control		Payments Upon Termination by the Company without Cause or by the Executives for Good Reason-Change in Control
David D. Nelson	Cash Severance	$	159,038	$	1,134,038	$	1,621,538
	Continuation of Insurance Benefits	—		15,039		15,039
	Acceleration of Stock Awards	177,676		—		177,676
	Total	$	336,714	$	1,149,077	$	1,814,253

Douglas R. Gulling	Cash Severance	$	109,000	$	446,000	$	783,000
	Continuation of Insurance Benefits	—		9,711		14,567
	Acceleration of Stock Awards	120,833		—		120,833
	Total	$	229,833	$	455,711	$	918,400

Harlee N. Olafson	Cash Severance	$	94,925	$	425,925	$	756,925
	Continuation of Insurance Benefits	—		10,026		15,039
	Acceleration of Stock Awards	62,632		—		62,632
	Total	$	157,557	$	435,951	$	834,596

Brad L. Winterbottom	Cash Severance	$	109,000	$	446,000	$	783,000
	Continuation of Insurance Benefits	—		10,026		15,039
	Acceleration of Stock Awards	120,833		—		120,833
	Total	$	229,833	$	456,026	$	918,872

Termination and Change in Control Benefits under Employment Agreement with Mr. Nelson

We entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Nelson, effective July 23, 2012, which superseded his prior employment agreement in its entirety. Mr. Nelson will serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as the Chief Executive Officer of West Bank under the agreement, as well as a member of the board of directors of both entities. The initial term under Mr. Nelson's agreement ends on December 31, 2015, but the agreement renews automatically for one-year terms on January 1, 2015, and on each January 1 thereafter unless either party gives notice of non-renewal. Mr. Nelson is entitled to a minimum annual salary of $350,000 pursuant to the ~~variously indicated assumed reasons. The~~agreement, as well as annual performance bonuses and participation in the Company's benefit plans. Under the agreement, upon a termination of Mr. Nelson's employment by the Company ~~believes that~~without cause or by Mr. Nelson for good reason, Mr. Nelson will be entitled to severance payments equal to 200% of the sum of his base salary plus annual bonus, payable in 24 equal monthly installments following ~~described~~the date of termination, as well as 18 months of continued medical coverage. If such a termination occurs within six months before or two years following a change in control, Mr. Nelson will be entitled to severance payments ~~cannot~~equal to 300% of the sum of his base salary plus annual bonus, payable in a lump sum, as well as 18 months of continued medical coverage. All of the aforementioned severance benefits are contingent upon Mr. Nelson's execution of a general release of claims. Under the agreement, Mr. Nelson will be ~~made in any form as long as any TARP obligation is outstanding.~~subject to 24-month non-compete and non-solicit restrictive covenants following the termination of his employment.

Termination and Change in Control Benefits under Employment Agreements with Messrs. Gulling, Olafson, and Winterbottom

~~The Company and~~We entered into new employment agreements with each of Messrs. Gulling, Olafson, and Winterbottom, ~~originally entered into the~~effective July 23, 2012, which superseded their prior employment agreements in ~~May 2008. At that time, the contracts ran through December 31, 2010. However, they automatically renew for a three-year term every January 1 unless~~their entirety. Under their respective agreements, Mr. Gulling will serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company ~~gives written notice~~and Chief Financial Officer of ~~nonrenewal by November 30~~West Bank, Mr. Olafson will serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of the ~~preceding year. No such notice was given in 2009,~~Company and ~~therefore,~~West Bank, and Mr. Winterbottom will serve as ~~of January 1, 2010, the contracts run through December 31, 2012. The agreements contain restrictions on the use~~Executive Vice President of the ~~Company’s confidential information, intellectual property,~~Company and ~~trade secrets. The agreements~~President of West Bank. Each individual will also ~~contain provisions prohibiting certain competition, solicitation, or tampering during the terms~~serve as a member of the ~~contracts and for one year after termination or resignation~~board of ~~employment. 0; Each contract contains an~~directors of West Bank. The initial term under each agreement that the Company’s rights may be enforced by injunctive relief. Disputes under or concerning the agreements must be resolved by amicable negotiations or confidential binding arbitration. The complete agreements are filed as exhibits to the Company’s May 23, 2008, report on Form 8-K, which may be viewed on the Company’s website.

The agreements provide for severance payments if the executive's employment is terminated for death, “permanent disability,” “without cause,” for “good reason,” or in the event of a “change in control” of the Company. The agreements do not provide for any severance payments if the Company terminates an agreement for “due cause” or if an executive voluntarily resigns for other than “good reason.” The phrases “permanent disability,” “due cause,” “good reason,” and “change in control” are defined in the agreements, and the Company believes the terms are reasonably typical of similar terms in other executive employment agreements.

~~If Mr. Gulling or Mr. Winterbottom had died~~ends on December 31, ~~2009,~~2014, but the agreements renew automatically for one-year terms on January 1, 2014, and on each January 1 thereafter unless either party gives notice of non-renewal. Messrs. Gulling, Olafson, and Winterbottom are each entitled to a minimum annual salary of $247,000 pursuant to their agreements, as well as annual performance bonuses and participation in the Company's benefit plans. Under the agreements, upon a termination of the respective executive's employment by the Company ~~would have been obligated~~without cause or by the executive for good reason, the executive will be entitled to ~~pay~~severance payments equal to 100% of the sum of his ~~designated beneficiary one month of~~ base salary plus ~~75 percent of his incentive~~annual bonus, ~~target for 2009. There were no target bonuses set for 2009. Therefore, as of December 31, 2009, the contractual death benefits for Messrs. Gulling and Winterbottom would have been $17,500.~~

If one of the named executive officers becomes permanently disabled and eligible for long-term disability benefits under the Company’s long-term disability plan, the Company is contractually obligated to supplement the first year of long-term disability insurance benefits so that the executive would be paid full base salary for twelve months after becoming disabled. Alternatively, if permanent disability is established by certification by one or more doctors acceptable to the Company and the officer, but no insurance benefit is available, then the Company shall pay the officer base salary for one year after the disability determination. In either instance, the executive would also receive 75 percent of the officer’s incentive compensation target for the yearpayable in ~~which disability is determined, prorated to~~12 equal monthly installments following the date of ~~disability. For a permanent disability starting on December 31, 2009, the maximum payments due Messrs. Gulling and Winterbottom would have been $210,000 (assuming no insurance benefit).~~

termination, as well as 12 months of continued medical coverage. If either of the named executive officers are terminated without cause, they are contractually entitled to a severance benefit of three times base salary, to be paid within sixty days of termination, plus insurance premiums to provide the executive with family health coverage under COBRA for one year after termination. The lump sum without cause severance benefits forsuch a termination ~~on December 31, 2009, would have been $630,000 for Messrs. Gulling and Winterbottom. The medical premium benefit would have cost approximately $11,520.~~

~~The employment agreements also provide for severance benefits if Messrs. Gulling~~occurs within six months before or Winterbottom terminates employment for good reason, which generally means a termination after the executive’s job functions, location, or base salary have been materially changed. In order to be eligible for a good reason severance benefit, the executive has to provide the Company a ninety-day notice of termination that includes a thirty-day cure period. If a good reason termination becomes effective, the executive is due a severance benefit of at least the amount of one year's base salary plus $100,000. The maximum good reason severance benefit would be three times base salary plus $100,000. The lump sum benefit must be paid within sixty days after the revocation periodtwo years following execution of a required release of claims. In addition, the Company would pay insurance premiums to provide the executive with family health coverage under COBRA for one year after employment ceases. If the officer terminates an agreement for good reason and he is also then eligible for a change in control, the executive will be entitled to severance ~~benefit (as described below), he may choose between~~payments equal to 200% of the ~~alternative benefits. The~~sum of his base salary plus annual bonus, payable in a lump sum, as well as 18 months of continued medical coverage. All of the aforementioned severance benefits are contingent upon the respective executive's execution of a general release of claims. Under the agreements, Messrs. Gulling, Olafson, and Winterbottom will be subject to 12-month non-compete and non-solicit restrictive covenants following termination of employment (24 months if the termination occurs following a change in control ~~severance benefit~~of the Company).

Termination and Change in ~~most instances would be a larger payment than~~Control Benefits under 2012 Equity Incentive Plan

All restricted stock units under the ~~good reason benefit, but~~2012 Plan then held by the participant will become fully vested immediately if (1) the 2012 Plan and the respective award agreements are not fully assumed in the change in control ~~benefit is contingent on additional efforts by~~or (2) the ~~officer. The amounts of~~2012 Plan and the ~~good reason severance benefits, other than~~respective award agreements are fully assumed in the change in control ~~benefits, for~~and the participant incurs a termination ~~on December 31, 2009, would have been $620,000 plus approximately $11,520 for medical insurance premiums.~~

~~The change~~ of control severance benefits are three times the sum of base salary plus $100,000 for Messrs. Gulling and Winterbottom. In addition, the Company would pay insurance premiums to provide the executive with family health coverage under COBRA for one year after employment ceases. The change in control benefits are not paid until after the officer makes himself available to work forservice by the Company or ~~its successor~~a subsidiary without cause or by the participant for ~~a transition period~~good reason.

Further under the 2012 Plan, all restricted stock units generally will become fully vested upon the participant's termination of ~~not more than six months after a change in control. The change of control benefits shall be paid within sixty days after~~service due to the ~~waiver~~participant's disability or ~~expiration of~~ the transition period and after the expiration of any revocation period following the officer’s execution of a required release of claims. The amounts of this benefit for a change of control terminat ion on December 31, 2009, would have been $930,000 for Messrs. Gulling and Winterbottom plus approximately $11,520 for medical insurance premiums.participant's death.

Potential Payments Upon Termination
or Change in Control as of December 31, 2009

Named Executive Officer
Death (1)

Due
Cause

Permanent
Disability (2)

Without
Cause (3)(4)

Termination
by Employee
for Good Reason (3)(4)

Change
of
Control (3)(5)

David R. Milligan $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Douglas R. Gulling 17,500 - 210,000 630,000 620,000 930,000
Brad L. Winterbottom 17,500 - 210,000 630,000 620,000 990,000

~~(1)~~

~~Benefit is equal to one month of base pay plus 75 percent of incentive target compensation prorated to date of death.~~

~~(2)~~

~~These numbers would be applicable if there was no available disability insurance benefit.~~

~~(3)~~

~~COBRA medical benefits will also be paid for one year.~~

~~(4)~~

~~If the Change of Control benefit is applicable, the Named Executive Officer can choose the Change of Control benefit, if higher.~~

~~(5)~~

~~If requested, each of the Named Executive Officers must be employed six months after the Change in Control to receive full benefits.~~

~~INDEPENDENT~~INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee approved McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~ LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as the principal accountant for the ~~Company.~~Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~ LLP will conduct the audit of the Company and its ~~subsidiaries~~subsidiary for ~~2010.~~2013. McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~ LLP was also the Company's principal accountant and performed the audit in ~~2009.~~2012.

A representative from McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~ LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting. HeThe representative will have the opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from ~~Shareholders.~~stockholders.

Audit Fees

~~Audit~~ ~~Fees~~

~~The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by McGladrey & Pullen, LLP for~~During the ~~audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for~~period covering the fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2009,~~2012 and ~~2008, and fees billed for other services rendered by~~2011, McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~ LLP and ~~its associated entity,~~ RSM McGladrey, Inc. (through November 30, 2011, RSM McGladrey, Inc. was an affiliate of McGladrey LLP) performed the professional services listed in the following table.


	2009		2008		2012		2011
Audit fees (1)	$	226,500	$	220,900	$	248,345	$	240,000
Audit-related fees (2)		29,750		23,700	27,500		25,000
Tax fees (3)		23,200		26,500	12,270		8,105
All other fees (4)		-		8,900	2,313		35,424
Total	$	279,450	$	280,000	$	290,428	$	308,529


(1)	Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided for the audit of the ~~Company’s~~Company's annual financial statements, review of the ~~Company’s~~Company's quarterly financial statements in connection with the filing of current and periodic reports, FHA compliance audit, and reporting on internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley.


(2)	Audit-related fees represent the audit of the ~~Company’s profit sharing plan, agreed upon procedures for student lending,~~Company's Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan, filing of a registration ~~statements,~~statement in 2012, and ~~various items~~consultation on ~~new or pending~~ accounting ~~pronouncements.~~issues.


(3)	Tax fees represent fees for professional services related to tax compliance, which included ~~preparation~~review of tax returns and tax advice ~~regarding disposition of a subsidiary, investments, and tax credits.~~on several accounting issues.


(4)	All other fees represent fees for ~~due diligence services on a potential acquisition in 2008.~~consulting related to software installation.

~~Independence:~~ The Audit Committee considered whether the non-audit services provided to the Company by McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~ LLP ~~and its associated entity, RSM McGladrey, Inc.,~~ are compatible with maintaining ~~the~~McGladrey LLP's independence ~~of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP,~~ and concluded that the independence of McGladrey ~~& Pullen,~~ LLP is not compromised by the provision of such services.

The Audit Committee pre-approves all auditing services and permitted non-audit services, including the fees and terms of those services, to be performed for the Company by its independent registered public accounting firm prior to engagement.

GENERAL MATTERS

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

~~GENERAL MATTERS~~

~~Transactions with Related Persons~~

Certain directors of the Company have direct and indirect material interests in loans made by West ~~Bank involving more than $120,000.~~Bank. All of the loans were made in West ~~Bank’s~~Bank's ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with other persons not related to West Bank or the Company, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. None of the loans have been classified as nonaccrual, past due, restructured, or potential problem loans.The Board considered these loans when considering the independence of its directors and determined that such loans did not prevent the relevant directors from being able to serve as independent directors.

The Audit ~~Committee’s~~Committee's charter requires the Audit Committee to review and approve all related party transactions that must be disclosed. All transactions between the Company or its subsidiaries and any related person, including loans made by West Bank involving $120,000 or more, are reviewed to determine whether all material facts of the transaction are known to the Audit Committee, the transaction complies with known legal requirements, and the transaction is fair to the Company ~~or its subsidiaries.~~and West Bank. The Audit Committee completed the required review of the fiscal year ~~2009~~2012 related party transactions, and all transactions were approved and ratified.

~~2011~~ ~~Shareholder~~2014 Stockholder Proposals

InAny proposal which a stockholder intends to present at the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders must be received by the Company by November 6, 2013, in order ~~for any proposals of Shareholders~~ to be ~~presented as an item of business at~~eligible for inclusion in the ~~Annual Meeting of Shareholders~~Company's proxy statement and proxy card relating to such meeting, unless the date of the ~~Company to be held~~2014 annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from April 25, 2014, in ~~2011,~~which case the proposal must be received ata reasonable time before the ~~Company's principal executive offices no later than November 15, 2010,~~Company begins to print and ~~must be limited~~send its proxy materials for the 2014 annual meeting. Upon timely receipt of any such proposal, the Company will determine whether to ~~500 words. To be included~~include such proposal in the ~~Company’s~~ proxy statement and proxy in accordance with applicable SEC regulations governing stockholder proposals and the ~~Shareholder must be a holder~~solicitation of record or beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value of the Company’s shares entitled to be voted on the proposal and have held the shares for at least one year, and shall continue to hold the shares through the date of the meeting. Either the Shareholder, or the Shareholder’s representative who is qualified under state law to present the proposal on his or her behalf, must attend the meeting to present the proposal. & #160;Shareholders may not submit more than one proposal. A Shareholder proposal submitted outside the procedures prescribed in Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 shall be considered untimely unless received not later than January 28, 2011.proxies.

~~Shareholders~~Stockholders wishing to recommend names of individuals for possible nomination to the Board may do so according to the following procedures:


1.	Contact Alice A. Jensen, Corporate Secretary, at the ~~Secretary of the Company~~address below to obtain the Board Membership Criteria established by the Board.

2.	~~Make~~
2.	Provide Ms. Jensen with a typewritten ~~submission to the Secretary of the Company~~recommendation naming the proposed candidate and specifically ~~noting~~explaining how the candidate meets the criteria ~~set forth~~adopted by the Board.

3.
3.	Submit the recommendation to ~~the Company by~~Ms. Jensen no later than 120 days prior to the expected mailing date of the ~~proxy.~~proxy (November 6, 2013).


4.	Prove the person making the recommendation is a ~~Shareholder~~Company stockholder who owns shares with a market value of at least $2,000 and who has held those shares for at least one year at the time the submission is made.


5.	If the person being recommended is aware of the submission, he or she must sign a statement so indicating.


6.	If the person being recommended is not aware of the submission, the submitter must explain why.

The written submission must be mailed or hand delivered to:

Ms. Alice A. Jensen

Corporate Secretary

West Bancorporation, Inc.

1601 22^nd Street

West Des Moines, Iowa 50266

~~Shareholder~~Stockholder Communications

It is the general policy of the Board that management speaks for the Company. To the extent ~~Shareholders~~stockholders wish to communicate with a Company representative, they may do so by contacting ~~Doug~~Douglas Gulling, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, 1601 22^nd Street, West Des Moines, Iowa 50266. Mr. Gulling may be reached by telephone at 515-222-2300 or by email at dgulling@westbankiowa.com.

The Company has a process for ~~Shareholders~~stockholders to send communications to the Board or any of its individual members. Any ~~Shareholder~~stockholder wishing to communicate with one or more Board members should address a written communication to Mr. Gulling at one of the addresses noted above. Mr. Gulling will forward all ~~Shareholder~~appropriate stockholder communications to the full Board or its individual members as appropriate. Mr. Gulling will generally not forward communications that are primarily commercial in nature or related to an improper or irrelevant topic.

Form 10-K

The Company ~~will provide, when available,~~has included a copy of its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the SEC, ~~without charge to each Shareholder, upon request. Such~~with this proxy statement. A request for an additional copy should be directed to Alice A. Jensen, Corporate Secretary, West Bancorporation, Inc., 1601 22^nd Street, West Des Moines, Iowa 50266 or by calling 515-222-2300. The ~~Company’s~~Company's Form 10-K will also be available on the SEC's website at http://~~www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/webusers.htm,~~www.sec.gov, and through a link at the Investor Relations, SEC Filings section of the ~~Company’s~~Company's website (www.westbankiowa.com).

~~Delivery~~

Delivery of Documents to ~~Shareholders~~Stockholders Sharing an Address

In some instances, only one annual report or proxy statement is being delivered to two or more ~~Shareholders~~stockholders who share an address. The ~~Company has not received contrary instructions from any Shareholder. However, the~~ Company will promptly deliver additional copies of its proxy statement, summary annual report, ~~or proxy statement~~and the annual report on Form 10-K to any ~~Shareholder~~stockholder who makes such a request. Any ~~Shareholder~~stockholder who wishes to receive separate copies of ~~the annual report or proxy statement~~these documents in the future may notify Alice A. Jensen, Corporate Secretary, at 1601 22^nd Street, West Des Moines, Iowa 50266, or 515-222-2300. Alternatively, any ~~Shareholders~~stockholders sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of ~~the annual reports or proxy statements~~these documents may also notify Ms. ~~Jens en~~Jensen to request delivery of only one copy.

~~60;~~

By Order of the Board of Directors,

~~60;~~/s/ Alice A. Jensen

~~60;~~Alice A. Jensen ~~Secretary~~

Secretary

West Bancorporation, Inc.

March ~~12, 2010~~6, 2013

~~WEST BANCORPORATION, INC.~~

~~APPENDIX TO THE PROXY STATEMENT~~

~~FISCAL YEAR 2009~~

~~This Appendix to the Proxy Statement shall serve as an Annual Report to Shareholders pursuant to Rule 14a-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.~~

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~


	~~PAGE~~

~~General Information~~	2

~~Selected Financial Data~~	3

~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis~~	4

~~Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~	32

~~Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting~~	34

~~Consolidated Balance Sheets~~	35

~~Consolidated Statements of Operations~~	36

~~Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)~~	38

~~Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity~~	39

~~Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows~~	40

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~	42

~~Stock Information~~	71

~~WEST~~ ~~BANCORPORATION, INC.~~

~~GENERAL INFORMATION~~

West Bancorporation, Inc. (the “Company”) is an Iowa corporation and financial holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. The Company was organized and incorporated in 1984 to serve as a holding company for its principal subsidiary, West Bank.

West Bank’s operations are conducted primarily within the Des Moines and Iowa City, Iowa, metropolitan areas. The principal sources of revenue are from interest and fees earned on loans, service charges on deposit accounts, trust services, and interest on fixed income securities.

West Bancorporation Capital Trust I (the “Trust”) was formed for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. The Trust is recorded on the books of the Company using the equity method of accounting.

~~The Company’s stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol WTBA.~~

West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Selected Financial Data
Years Ended December 31
(in thousands, except per share amounts) 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Operating Results
Interest income $ 67,730 $ 72,532 $ 82,027 $ 79,738 $ 63,475
Interest expense 26,636 31,431 43,823 40,639 25,042
Net interest income 41,094 41,101 38,204 39,099 38,433
Provision for loan losses 24,500 16,600 2,350 1,725 1,775
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 16,594 24,501 35,854 37,374 36,658
Noninterest income, including securities gains (losses) 8,904 4,301 8,430 8,128 8,395
Noninterest expense 37,905 20,105 17,870 17,425 16,247
Income (loss) before income taxes (12,407 ) 8,697 26,414 28,077 28,806
Income taxes (benefits) (7,356 ) 1,386 8,062 8,935 9,131
Income (loss) from continuing operations (5,051 ) 7,311 18,352 19,142 19,675
Discontinued operations:
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before
       income taxes
(10,262 ) 563 982 458 664
Income taxes (benefits) (696 ) 238 414 193 264
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (9,566 ) 325 568 265 400
Net income (loss) (14,617 ) 7,636 18,920 19,407 20,075
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount (2,276 ) - - - -
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders $ (16,893 ) $ 7,636 $ 18,920 $ 19,407 $ 20,075

Dividends and Per Share Data
Cash dividends $ 1,566 $ 11,138 $ 11,224 $ 10,956 $ 10,689
Cash dividends per common share 0.090 0.640 0.640 0.625 0.610
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share
     from continuing operations
(0.42 ) 0.42 1.05 1.09 1.12
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share
     from discontinued operations
(0.55 ) 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share (0.97 ) 0.44 1.08 1.11 1.14
Average common shares outstanding 17,404 17,405 17,536 17,537 17,537

Year End Balances
Total assets $ 1,575,054 $ 1,554,276 $ 1,341,289 $ 1,270,013 $ 1,245,417
Average assets 1,618,557 1,371,401 1,309,119 1,298,410 1,192,208
Investment securities 351,269 189,558 237,378 261,578 274,719
Loans, including held for sale 1,021,042 1,101,753 985,423 904,422 867,504
Allowance for loan losses (19,126 ) (15,441 ) (8,935 ) (8,494 ) (7,615 )
Deposits 1,246,617 1,155,132 911,371 926,251 945,553
Long-term borrowings 145,619 145,619 123,619 105,519 98,188
Stockholders' equity 133,059 150,063 121,606 113,812 104,521
Average stockholders' equity 143,163 118,090 116,683 107,345 100,392

Performance Ratios
Equity to assets ratio (average equity divided by
     average assets)
8.85 % 8.61 % 8.91 % 8.27 % 8.42 %
Return on assets (net income (loss) divided by average
     assets)
-0.90 % 0.56 % 1.45 % 1.49 % 1.68 %
Return on equity (net income (loss) divided by average
     equity)
-10.21 % 6.47 % 16.21 % 18.08 % 20.00 %
Efficiency ratio (noninterest expense divided by
     noninterest income plus tax-equivalent net
     interest income)
45.99 % 38.56 % 37.08 % 35.47 % 33.56 %
Dividend payout ratio (dividends paid divided
     by net income)
NM 145.86 % 59.32 % 56.45 % 53.25 %
NM - not meaningful

~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)~~

~~INTRODUCTION~~

The Company’s 2009 financial results were very disappointing and certainly unanticipated. The Company's net loss was ($14,617). The most significant drivers of this loss were goodwill impairment, loss from discontinued operations, and the second year of an unprecedented level of provision for loan losses.

The Company’s common stock started trading below book value during the second quarter. This event ultimately triggered an accounting requirement that we analyze our reported goodwill for possible impairment. We retained a third party valuation firm and management concluded that West Bank’s reported goodwill totaling $13,376, which was related to the 2003 acquisition of Hawkeye State Bank in Iowa City, was entirely impaired. We recorded an impairment charge in the second quarter to write-off that goodwill, although the loss had minimal impact on our regulatory capital ratios. The Company currently has no goodwill recorded on its books, so no future goodwill impairment is possible, unless the Company makes an acquisition. No acquisitions are currently being contemplated.

After receiving indications of interest from third parties to purchase WB Capital Management Inc. (WB Capital), the Company’s Board of Director’s decided to exit this business line. On October 1, 2009, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of its stock ownership interest in WB Capital. The sale closed on December 31, 2009. The net loss from discontinued operations attributable to this divestiture was ($9,566). The Company’s only remaining operating subsidiary is West Bank.

Due in large part to the significant problems in the economy in 2009, West Bank's loan losses were the highest in its history. The 2009 provision for loan losses was $24,500, which was up from $16,600 in 2008 and $2,350 in 2007. The quarterly provision for loan losses peaked at $15,000 for the second quarter of 2009 and remained stable at $3,000 for the last two quarters.

The loan losses in 2009 resulted in significant part from a devastated commercial and real estate development market in the Company’s primary operating areas; a decline in discretionary consumer spending, which significantly reduced cash flow at area retail businesses; a substantial decline in business spending that impacted employees and suppliers; and a multi-million dollar loan fraud perpetrated on West Bank by one of its customers. While we believe our historic loan procedures were appropriate and customary in our market places, West Bank has instituted additional procedures that it believes should prevent or mitigate future adverse impacts similar to this fraud loss. However, we can not predict the performance of the economy with certainty or the impact that performance will have on our borrowers' abili ties to repay their loans. While we are cautiously optimistic, we believe the economies in our marketplaces and, derivatively, our customers, may be under unusual material stress for several more years as a result of the declines in property values, general economic activity, and employment levels. In addition, we are evaluating, but can not now be certain of the future impacts of likely increases in interest rates or reductions in the level of government spending.

~~West Bank was one of the initial developers of the internet-based social savings program SmartyPig~~® ~~and continues to own approximately thirteen percent of the company. SmartyPig~~® has grown substantially since its launch in 2008. West Bank has recently encouraged SmartyPig, LLC to move the approximately $200 million of savings account deposits to a larger institution because the amount of the program-related deposits is becoming a disproportionate percentage of West Bank’s deposits. We view this as a positive development for both SmartyPig® and West B ank. We expect that a transfer will occur in 2010 and have managed our liquidity accordingly by accumulating short-term liquid assets. If the transfer does occur in 2010, it is likely that the Company’s total assets will decline by year end.

As of the writing of this report, we anticipate that the Company will be profitable in 2010. The amount of the anticipated profit will depend, in large part, on the amount of loan losses we incur. We anticipate loan losses will decline in 2010, but our loan portfolio still presents substantially more than normal risks. A significant portion of our portfolio is comprised of loans secured by commercial real estate. While we believe we have aggressively addressed declining valuation issues when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, future changes in valuations in 2010 and beyond remain substantially uncertain. Finally, we also think the dollar amount of our loan portfolio will remain at its current level or possibly decline in 2010 and perhaps beyond. Ne w loan activity is not anticipated to significantly exceed the amount of loan payments and payoffs expected in 2010.

~~-----------------------------~~

The following discussion describes the consolidated operations of the Company, including West Bank, West Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, WB Funding Corporation (which owns an interest in SmartyPig, LLC), and West Bank’s 99.9 percent owned subsidiary, ICD IV, LLC. The accounts of WB Capital are included in the accompanying financial statements as discontinued operations, because one hundred percent of that company was sold on December 31, 2009. Accordingly, certain items in the prior period financial statements were reclassified to be consistent with the classifications used in the December 31, 2009, financial statements. The reclassifications had no effect on net income (loss) or stockholders’ equity.

~~CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~

This report is based on the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The financial information contained in these statements is based on the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. However, the preparation of these statements requires management to make certain estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Based on its consideration of accounting policies that involve the most complex and subjective estimates and judgments, management has identified its most critical accounting policies to be those related to asset impairment judgments, including fair value and other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) of available for sale investment securities, the valuation of other real estate owned, and the allowance for loan losses.

Securities available for sale are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of deferred income taxes. The Company evaluates its debt securities for OTTI on an ongoing basis for those securities with a fair value below amortized cost. The review takes into consideration current market conditions, issuer rating changes and trends, the credit worthiness of the obligator of the security, current analysts’ evaluations, failure of the issuer to make scheduled interest or principal payments, the Company’s lack of intent to sell the security or whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery, as well as other qualitative factors. 0;The term OTTI is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospect for a near-term recovery of value is not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment. Any portion of such a decline in value associated with credit loss is recognized in earnings as an impairment loss with the remaining noncredit-related component being recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. A credit loss is determined by assessing whether the amortized cost basis of the security will be recovered by comparing the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security, computed using original yield as the discount rate, to the amortized cost basis of the security. The shortfall of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected in relation to the amortized cost basis is considered to be the “credit loss.” In ad dition to credit losses, losses are recognized for a security having an unrealized loss if the Company has the intent to sell the security or if it is more-likely-than-not the Company will be required to sell the security before collection of the principal amount.

Other real estate owned includes real estate properties acquired through or in lieu of foreclosure. They are initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs. After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management during the holding period by obtaining updated appraisals or other market information. Any subsequent write-downs are recorded as a charge to operations.

The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that collectability of the principal is unlikely. The Company has policies and procedures for evaluating the overall credit quality of its loan portfolio, including timely identification of potential problem loans. On a quarterly basis, management reviews the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses, incorporating a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative factors include the Company’s historical loss experience, delinquency and charge-off trends, collateral values, known information about individual loans, and other factors. Qualitative factors in clude the general economic environment in the Company’s market areas and the expected trend of those economic conditions. While management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions or the other factors relied upon. To the extent actual results differ from forecasts and management’s judgment, the allowance for loan losses may be greater or less than future charge-offs.

~~RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – 2009 COMPARED TO 2008~~

~~OVERVIEW~~

Total net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009, was ($14,617) compared to net income of $7,636 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company’s return on average equity (ROE) was (10.21) percent in 2009, compared to 6.47 percent in 2008. The return on average assets (ROA) was (0.90) percent, compared to 0.56 percent for the prior year.

Net loss from continuing operations was ($5,051) for 2009 compared to net income of $7,311 for 2008. Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations were ($0.42) and $0.42 for the same periods, respectively. The difference between the net loss from continuing operations in 2009 compared to 2008 net income from continuing operations was due in substantial part to goodwill impairment at West Bank of $13,376, the $7,900 increase in provision for loan losses, and the $2,130 increase in FDIC insurance expense.

The 2009 provision for loan losses, which was $24,500, was a historic high due to significant charge-offs in 2009. Charge-offs of commercial, real estate construction, commercial real estate and other loans totaled $21,380. For much of 2009 the economy was in a recession and significant difficulty was experienced in the construction and real estate development, commercial real estate, and commercial business sectors.

Noninterest income, exclusive of securities gains (losses), increased by $665 compared to 2008. The increase was due to $840 of gain received in the first quarter of 2009 from a bank-owned life insurance policy as the result of the death of a West Bank officer and an increase of $570 in gains and fees on the sales of residential mortgages sold into the secondary market. Offsetting this growth was an $811 decline in service charges on deposit accounts primarily due to lower returned check charges.

Goodwill impairment was reviewed as of June 30, 2009, because the Company’s common stock traded at a market price of less than its per share book value. With the assistance of a third party valuation firm, management prepared an estimate of the fair value of a 100 percent controlling marketable interest in the outstanding stock of West Bank. A combination of the income and market approaches was used in determining the fair value. Under the income approach, the primary factor considered was the ability of West Bank to generate future cash flows. A discount rate was estimated by utilizing the build-up method which factors in the following components: a risk-free rate of return, an equity risk premium, an industry risk premium or discount, a size premium and risk associated specifically wi th West Bank. A discount rate of 12.04 percent was then applied to projected future cash flows. Under the market approach, stock market data regularly published on publicly traded companies considered to be similar to West Bank were utilized in determining market value. The two indicated values were then weighted to represent the relative importance a market participant might reasonably be expected to place on the results of each method. Based on the above analysis, an impairment of $13,376, or all of the goodwill recorded on West Bank’s balance sheet, was taken in the second quarter of 2009.

Noninterest expense (exclusive of goodwill impairment) increased $4,424 over 2008. The increase included the previously mentioned increase in FDIC insurance expense, including a one-time special assessment, a $681 increase in salary and benefit costs, a $459 increase in occupancy costs, a $650 increase in deposit operations expense, and a $345 increase in costs associated with nonperforming assets.

The Company has consistently used the efficiency ratio to measure productivity. This ratio is computed by dividing noninterest expense (excluding goodwill impairment and discontinued operations) by the sum of tax-equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income (excluding securities gains and net impairment losses and discontinued operations). For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company’s efficiency ratio was 45.99 percent, up from the prior year’s ratio of 38.56 percent. The ratio for both years is significantly better than peer group averages, which are generally around 75 percent according to data in the September 2009 Bank Holding Company Performance Report, a report prepared by the Federal Reserve Board’s Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation.

After receiving indications of interest from third parties to purchase WB Capital, the Company’s Board of Directors decided to exit this business line and focus on community banking. The Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of its stock in WB Capital in October 2009, and the sale closed on December 31, 2009. The net loss from discontinued operations of WB Capital was ($9,566) compared to net income of $325 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The loss was the result of $11,160 of goodwill impairment recorded at WB Capital during the second and third quarters of 2009. Revenues were lower than the prior year because of the decline in stock values and lower levels of assets under management. Operating expenses (exclusive of goodwill impairment) were $1,746 lo wer in 2009 than in 2008 primarily due to lower staffing levels and a concerted effort to reduce operating costs.

~~Net Interest Income~~

Net interest income declined only $7 to $41,094 for 2009 despite the 52 basis point decline in net interest margin to 2.86 percent from 3.38 percent in 2008 and the high volume of nonperforming assets. Yields on earning assets declined at a faster pace than the rates paid on deposits and borrowings. The average yield on earning assets declined 124 basis points, while the average rate on interest-bearing liabilities declined 86 basis points. The net interest spread, which is the difference between the yields earned on assets and the rates paid on liabilities, declined to 2.49 percent from 2.87 percent a year earlier. The higher level of interest earning assets offset the previously mentioned negative trends.

For additional details on changes in interest rates and yields and volume variances, see the section of this report entitled, Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity; Interest Rates; and Interest Differential.

~~Loan Volume/Loan Quality~~

At December 31, 2009, total loans declined $80,025, to $1,020,710 from $1,100,735 a year earlier. Demand for new loans by businesses in the Company’s markets is soft. Requests for commercial real estate, new construction and land development loans have fallen off substantially and customers are paying down debt if they are able. Nonperforming loans at December 31, 2009, totaled $26,317 or 2.58 percent of total loans. At December 31, 2008, nonperforming loans totaled $28,835 or 2.62 percent of total loans. Nonperforming loans include loans on nonaccrual status, loans that have been renegotiated to below market interest rates or terms, and loans past due 90 days or more. In addition, at December 31, 2009, West Bank held $25,350 of “other real estate owned,̶ 1; which is property acquired through or in lieu of foreclosure. For more discussion on loan quality, see the Summary of the Allowance for Loan Losses section of this report.

The allowance for loan losses, which totaled $19,126, represented 1.87 percent of total loans and 72.7 percent of nonperforming loans at the end of 2009, compared to 1.40 percent and 53.55 percent for 2008. The provision for loan losses totaled $24,500 for 2009, up from $16,600 for 2008. The Company’s net charge-offs as a percent of average loans were 1.89 percent for 2009, compared to 0.96 percent for 2008. The amount of loans charged off in 2009 totaled $21,380, compared to $10,370 in 2008. Recoveries in 2009 from loans previously charged off were $565, up from $276 in the prior year. Management believes the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2009, was sufficient to absorb probable loan losses within the portfolio.

~~Noninterest Income~~

The following table shows the variance from the prior year in the noninterest income categories shown in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, accounts within the “Other income” category that represent significant variances are shown.

Years ended December 31
Noninterest income: 2009 2008 Change Change %
Service charges on deposit accounts $ 4,021 $ 4,832 $ (811 ) -16.78 %
Trust services 786 789 (3 ) -0.38 %
Gains and fees on sales of residential mortgages 1,114 544 570 104.78 %
Increase in cash value of bank-owned life insurance 776 936 (160 ) -17.09 %
Gain from bank-owned life insurance 840 - 840 N/A
Other income:
Debit card usage fees 1,123 880 243 27.61 %
All other income 972 986 (14 ) -1.42 %
Total other income 2,095 1,866 229 12.27 %
Total noninterest income $ 9,632 $ 8,967 $ 665 7.42 %

Service charges on deposit accounts declined due to a $722 reduction in return check charges. In the current uncertain economy, customers appear to be more conscientious about monitoring their checking account balances. Service charges on commercial accounts declined 5.1 percent or $44 due to revised fee schedules implemented in September 2009.

The volume of originations of residential mortgages sold into the secondary market more than doubled compared to the prior year. This source of revenue is expected to remain strong as long as historically low interest rates allow consumers to refinance existing mortgages in order to reduce their monthly costs. Despite the low level of home sales, consumers are selectively purchasing real estate while locking in relatively low long-term rates.

The 2009 decline in the increase in cash value of bank-owned life insurance was due to lower market interest rates. As previously discussed, West Bank received tax-exempt income from a gain on life insurance proceeds as the result of the death of one of its officers in the first quarter of 2009.

Debit card usage fees continued to increase in 2009 as the Reward Me Checking product grew by over 1,900 accounts and approximately $45,000 in balances compared to December 31, 2008. This product was introduced in April 2008 and encourages the use of electronic payments. This source of revenue is expected to continue to grow due to the convenience of this payment method and the potential interest rate paid on the first tier of the account balance. The rate of growth may decline due to the October 2009 lowering of the size of the first tier on which the incentive rate is paid from $50 to $30.

~~Investment Securities Gains (Losses)~~

During 2009, West Bank investment securities impairment losses totaling $2,612 were recognized through earnings. Those losses consisted of $2,267 on five single-issuer trust preferred securities, a $310 OTTI credit loss on a pooled trust preferred security, and a $35 loss on a unit trust comprised of the common stock of several community banks and bank holding companies. Management liquidated certain bonds during the second half of 2009 in order to reduce the credit risk in the West Bank investment portfolio. Trust preferred, corporate, and selected agency and municipal bonds were sold resulting in gains totaling $1,884 compared to gains of $73 in 2008. By the end of the year, the trust preferred securities in the West Bank portfolio were reduced to two single-issuer bonds, which are consider ed to have low risk, and one pooled trust preferred security.

~~Noninterest Expense~~

The following table shows the variance from the prior year in the noninterest expense categories shown in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, accounts within the “Other expenses” category that represent significant variances are shown.

Years ended December 31
Noninterest expense: 2009 2008 Change Change %
Salaries and employee benefits $ 9,938 $ 9,257 $ 681 7.36 %
Occupancy 3,451 2,992 459 15.34 %
Data processing 1,761 1,748 13 0.74 %
FDIC insurance expense 2,736 606 2,130 351.49 %
Goodwill impairment 13,376 - 13,376 N/A
Other expenses:
Insurance 285 224 61 27.23 %
Marketing 504 719 (215 ) -29.90 %
Professional fees 964 941 23 2.44 %
Consulting fees 413 210 203 96.67 %
Director fees 274 278 (4 ) -1.44 %
Deposit operations expense 821 171 650 380.12 %
Bank service charges and fees 411 221 190 85.97 %
Other real estate owned expense 368 166 202 121.69 %
Nonreimbursed loan expenses 191 48 143 297.92 %
Training 91 179 (88 ) -49.16 %
Charitable contributions 200 113 87 76.99 %
Intangible amortization 205 238 (33 ) -13.87 %
All other 1,916 1,994 (78 ) -3.91 %
Total other 6,643 5,502 1,141 20.74 %
Total noninterest expense $ 37,905 $ 20,105 $ 17,800 88.54 %

Salaries and benefits expense increased due to annual salary increases, a change in the paid time off policy, an increase in commission expense related to the higher volume of mortgage loans sold into the secondary market, a ten percent increase in medical insurance costs, and a decline in salary cost deferred for new loan originations due to a lower volume of new loans. Partially offsetting these increases was the elimination of annual bonuses for most officers and the decision to make no 2009 profit sharing contribution. For 2010, most salaries have been frozen at 2009 levels, at least until the Company returns to consistent profitability.

~~Occupancy expenses increased in 2009 because of the February 2009 opening of a new branch in Waukee and a $190 one-time lease buyout for unused space leased by the Company.~~

FDIC insurance expense increased as a result of rate increases, an emergency special assessment in the second quarter of 2009 as part of the FDIC’s restoration plan for the Deposit Insurance Fund, significantly higher average deposits, and participation in the FDIC’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”) which is in effect from mid-November 2008 through June 2010.

On December 30, 2009, all insured institutions were required to prepay FDIC assessments for three and one-quarter years. The prepayment was based on average third quarter deposits and assumptions about future deposit growth. West Bank’s $7,200 payment will be amortized over the prepayment period.

As previously mentioned, the second quarter 2009 goodwill impairment consisted of writing off all goodwill at West Bank, or $13,376. The impairment analysis was completed at an interim period due to the Company’s market value, as measured by its common stock price, falling to a level below book value.

Insurance expense increased as the result of a rate increase for directors and officers coverage. Marketing expense declined due to cost containment efforts compared to 2008, which had included costs for launching a new product. Professional fees grew as legal fees increased due to the higher volume of impaired loans. Consulting fees increased due to the implementation of a customer relationship management system beginning in the second half of 2008, investment securities valuations completed by a consulting firm, hiring a third party firm to assist in evaluating goodwill for impairment, and fees paid in conjunction with the Company’s search for a new chief executive officer.

~~Deposit operations expense increased for 2009 due to costs associated with SmartyPig~~® ~~savings and Reward Me Checking interest-bearing products, which have both grown substantially compared to the prior year. Expenses related to SmartyPig~~® were significantly lower in the fourth quarter of 2009 as ACH transactions were transferred to another provider. West Bank’s service charges paid have increased for 2009 as a result of technological improvements in cash letter processing that allows better availability of funds from incoming deposits. The improved availability results in a loss of earnings credit used to offset the charges assessed by the processor. Service charges also increased due to retaining WB Capital to manage West Bank’s investment portfolio effective in September 2009.

Other real estate owned expense increased during 2009 due to increased operating costs for a higher number of properties held. Costs also included write-downs subsequent to transfers to this classification totaling $133 in 2009 and $70 in 2008. Nonreimbursed loan expenses increased due to the higher volume of impaired loans and the related costs to protect collateral values, and the write-down of $50 on one foreclosed asset.

~~Charitable contributions increased in 2009 because $200 of the previously mentioned bank-owned life insurance proceeds was contributed to the West Bancorporation Foundation in the first quarter.~~

~~Training expense and other expense declined due to cost containment efforts throughout 2009.~~

~~Income Taxes (Benefits)~~

The Company records a provision for income taxes (benefits) currently payable, along with a provision for those taxes payable or refundable in the future. Such deferred taxes arise from differences in the timing of certain items for financial statement reporting compared to income tax reporting. The effective income tax rate differs from the federal statutory income tax rate primarily due to tax-exempt interest income, the tax-exempt increase in cash value of bank-owned life insurance, disallowed interest expense, state income taxes, and in 2009, gain from bank-owned life insurance. For both years, the effective tax rate was also impacted by West Bank’s 2007 investment in a qualified community development entity, which generated a federal new market tax credit. The credit, which totals $2,730, is being recognized over a seven-year period. The effective rate of income tax expense (benefit) as a percent of income (loss) before income taxes from continuing operations was a (59.3) percent benefit for 2009, compared to expense of 15.9 percent for 2008. The benefit rate increased significantly as a result of the relatively high proportion of tax-exempt income compared to the loss from continuing operations before taxes in 2009. The federal income tax expense (benefit) was approximately ($7,067) and $652 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, while state income tax expense (benefit) was approximately ($289) and $734, respectively. State income tax expense was higher than federal tax expense in 2008 due to establishing a deferred tax valuation allowance against a state net operating loss of the Company. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against the tax effect of the state net operating loss, federal and state capital loss carryforwards, and equity security impairment as management believes it is more likely than not that such carryforwards will expire without being utilized.

~~RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – 2008 COMPARED TO 2007~~

~~OVERVIEW~~

Total net income for the year ended December 31, 2008, was $7,636, compared to $18,920 for 2007. Total basic and diluted earnings per common share were $0.44 in 2008, compared to $1.08 in 2007. The Company’s ROE was 6.47 percent in 2008, compared to 16.21 percent in 2007. The ROA was 0.56 percent, compared to 1.45 percent for the prior year.

Net income from continuing operations in 2008 was $7,311, compared to $18,352 in 2007. The reduction in 2008 earnings from continuing operations was primarily the result of a $14,250 increase in provision for loan losses compared to 2007 and recognition of $4,739 of investment security impairment losses on a Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. unsecured note, a pooled trust preferred security, and an investment in a unit trust comprised of the common stock of several community banks and bank holding companies.

Offsetting these negative items was a $2,897 increase in net interest income and a $542 increase in noninterest income, exclusive of impairment losses. Noninterest income, exclusive of impairment charges, was higher than in 2007 due to increases in debit card usage fees and gains and fees on sales of residential mortgages into the secondary market.

Noninterest expense for 2008 was $2,235 higher than in 2007. The increase included the impact of higher costs related to carrying higher levels of foreclosed real estate compared to recording gains on the sale of foreclosed real estate in the prior year. Also contributing to the increase in noninterest expense were increases in professional fees, marketing expenses, and the re-establishment of the FDIC assessment.

The $11,041 decline in net income from continuing operations in 2008 compared to 2007 included a reduction in West Bank net income of $10,201 due to the previously mentioned increase in provision for loan losses, investment securities impairment losses, and higher noninterest expense. Net interest income increased in 2008 compared to 2007 because the cost of funds declined more than the yield on a higher volume of earning assets.

The West Bank provision for loan losses was $16,600 in 2008, compared to $2,350 in 2007. The increase in provision for loan losses included specific provisions of $4,000 against two loans to a customer that had been the victim of a substantial fraud and $5,000 related to a large homebuilder and developer that failed. Net loans charged off totaled $10,094 in 2008, compared to $1,909 in 2007. Of the total net charge-offs in 2008, approximately $4,700 occurred in the second quarter and $4,000 in the fourth quarter. The higher net charge-offs in these quarters were primarily related to the two customers mentioned previously.

~~For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company’s efficiency ratio was 38.56 percent, up slightly from the prior year’s ratio of 37.08 percent.~~

Net income from discontinued operations declined to $325 for 2008 compared to $568 for 2007. Revenues were lower than the prior year due to the severe decline in stock values, which reduced assets under management at WB Capital. Operating expenses from discontinued operations were 1.7 percent lower than in 2007 despite recognizing an operating loss of $458 related to purchasing a defaulted Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. bond from the WB Capital Liquid Assets Fund. The bond was purchased from the money market mutual fund to prevent the fund from dropping below $1.00 per share.

On December 31, 2008, the Company received $36,000 from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) in exchange for 36,000 shares of cumulative senior preferred stock and a warrant to purchase 474,100 shares of common stock under the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”). The proceeds were initially used to pay off $2,000 of borrowings at the Company, and the remaining $34,000 was transferred to West Bank’s capital.

~~Net Interest Income~~

Net interest income increased $2,897, or 7.6 percent, to $41,101 for 2008, primarily due to the approximately $109,000 increase in average loan volume. The average yield on earning assets declined 105 basis points, while the average rate on interest-bearing liabilities declined 142 basis points. The net interest spread increased to 2.87 percent from 2.50 percent a year earlier. Net interest margin was 3.38 percent in 2008, up from 3.28 percent in 2007.

~~Loan Growth/Loan Quality~~

At December 31, 2008, total loans increased $117,170 to $1,100,735, from $983,565 a year earlier. Most of the growth came in commercial and commercial real estate loans. Nonperforming loans at December 31, 2008, totaled $28,835, or 2.62 percent of total loans. At December 31, 2007, nonperforming loans totaled $5,877 or 0.60 percent of total loans.

The allowance for loan losses, which totaled $15,441, represented 1.40 percent of total loans and 53.55 percent of nonperforming loans at the end of 2008, compared to 0.91 percent and 152.03 percent for 2007. The provision for loan losses totaled $16,600 for 2008, up from $2,350 for 2007. The Company’s net charge-offs as a percent of average loans were 0.96 percent for 2008 compared to 0.20 percent for 2007. The amount of loans charged off in 2008 totaled $10,370, compared to $2,142 in 2007. Recoveries in 2008 from loans previously charged off were $276, up slightly from $233 in the prior year.

~~Noninterest Income~~

Years ended December 31
Noninterest income: 2008 2007 Change Change %
Service charges on deposit accounts $ 4,832 $ 4,794 $ 38 0.79 %
Trust services 789 758 31 4.09 %
Gains and fees on sales of residential mortgages 544 161 383 237.89 %
Increase in cash value of bank-owned life insurance 936 890 46 5.17 %
Other income:
Debit card usage fees 880 659 221 33.54 %
VISA/MasterCard income 186 199 (13 ) -6.53 %
Letter of credit fees 150 196 (46 ) -23.47 %
All other income 650 768 (118 ) -15.36 %
Total other income 1,866 1,822 44 2.41 %
Total noninterest income $ 8,967 $ 8,425 $ 542 6.43 %

Service charges on deposit accounts increased slightly compared to the prior year. An increase in commercial fee income was offset by a decline in return check charges. Lower market interest rates resulted in a lower earnings credit on commercial checking accounts, which translated to a $227 increase in commercial service charge revenue. Return check charges declined $122 from 2007 as customers presented fewer checks against non-sufficient funds.

~~Trust fees have increased compared to the prior year due to new business and additional assets added to existing accounts.~~

Debit card usage fees increased because West Bank began offering a new product in April 2008 that encourages the use of electronic payments. VISA/MasterCard income declined as a result of lower transaction volumes compared to 2007.

~~The volume of originations of residential mortgages sold into the secondary market increased over 118 percent compared to 2007.~~

The all other income category declined in 2008 due to lower income related to West Bank’s official checks and letter of credit fees. All other income for 2007 included gains on disposals of fixed assets.

~~Investment Securities Gains (Losses)~~

During 2008, West Bank recorded a $1,800 impairment charge for an investment in an unsecured note of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. Net income was also reduced by a $2,622 impairment charge for a pooled trust preferred security, as it was determined estimated cash flows to be received over the life of the security would not be sufficient to cover all of the principal and interest. An investment owned by the Company in a unit trust comprised of the common stock of several community banks and bank holding companies was also deemed impaired. The impairment charge for this investment was $317.

~~Noninterest Expense~~

Years ended December 31
Noninterest expense: 2008 2007 Change Change %
Salaries and employee benefits $ 9,257 $ 9,187 $ 70 0.76 %
Occupancy 2,992 2,916 76 2.61 %
Data processing 1,748 1,706 42 2.46 %
FDIC insurance expense 606 109 497 455.96 %
Other expenses:
Insurance 224 178 46 25.84 %
Marketing 719 412 307 74.51 %
Business development 320 259 61 23.55 %
Professional fees 941 623 318 51.04 %
Consulting fees 210 164 46 28.05 %
Director fees 278 270 8 2.96 %
Other real estate owned expense 166 (259 ) 425 164.09 %
Training 179 94 85 90.43 %
Intangible amortization 238 217 21 9.68 %
All other 2,227 1,994 233 11.69 %
Total other 5,502 3,952 1,550 39.22 %
Total noninterest expense $ 20,105 $ 17,870 $ 2,235 12.51 %

The net increase in salaries and benefits resulted from higher salaries due to annual merit increases and the addition of five employees in 2008. These increases were partially offset by a reduction of $359 in bonuses and $111 in profit sharing expense because of the decline in 2008 net income.

~~Occupancy expenses grew in 2008 as the cost of service contracts increased.~~

Data processing expense increased because of costs related to higher volumes of PIN and signature-based debit/ATM card transactions and higher volumes of transactions and accounts on West Bank’s various deposit and loan applications.

~~FDIC expense increased as a result of the re-establishment of the FDIC assessment. West Bank’s share of a one-time assessment credit was almost fully utilized by March 31, 2008.~~

~~Marketing and business development expenses were up as a result of a retail sales campaign for a new product offering and more aggressive sales efforts overall.~~

Professional fees increased in 2008 due to higher legal fees, primarily associated with loan collection efforts, and higher external audit and tax compliance-related fees. Consulting fees increased due to the implementation of a customer relationship management system during the second half of 2008.

Other real estate owned expense increased due to a write-down taken on one piece of property and increased operating costs for a higher amount of properties held during 2008. The 2007 expense included gains on the sale of several other real estate properties, including a gain of $272 from the sale of farmland in eastern Iowa.

~~Training expense has increased as the result of an extensive sales training program for consumer branch managers and commercial bankers.~~

~~Income Taxes~~

In 2008 and 2007, the effective tax rate was impacted by West Bank’s 2007 investment in a qualified community development entity, which generated a federal new market tax credit. The effective rate of income tax expense as a percent of income before income taxes from continuing operations was 15.9 percent for 2008, compared to 30.5 percent for 2007. The federal income tax expense was approximately $652 and $7,064 for 2008 and 2007, respectively, while state income tax expense was approximately $734 and $998, respectively.

~~DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY; INTEREST RATES; AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL~~

~~Average Balances and an Analysis of Average Rates Earned and Paid~~

The following tables show average balances and interest income or interest expense, with the resulting average yield or rate by category of average earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities for the years indicated. Interest income and the resulting net interest income are shown on a fully taxable basis.

2009 2008 2007

Average
Balance

Revenue/
Expense

Yield/
Rate

Average
Balance

Revenue/
Expense

Yield/
Rate

Average
Balance

Revenue/
Expense

Yield/
Rate

Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Loans: (2) (3)
Commercial $ 399,696 $ 19,436 4.86 % $ 387,426 $ 22,175 5.72 % $ 352,176 $ 27,574 7.83 %
Real estate (1) 690,159 40,001 5.80 % 653,381 40,944 6.27 % 579,249 41,890 7.23 %
Consumer and other loans 10,190 643 6.31 % 13,751 867 6.30 % 14,244 1,034 7.26 %
Total loans 1,100,045 60,080 5.46 % 1,054,558 63,986 6.07 % 945,669 70,498 7.45 %

Investment securities:
Taxable 135,962 3,937 2.90 % 96,560 4,763 4.93 % 165,683 7,758 4.68 %
Tax-exempt (1) 94,859 5,797 6.11 % 92,646 5,393 5.82 % 86,794 4,581 5.28 %
Total investment securities 230,821 9,734 4.22 % 189,206 10,156 5.37 % 252,477 12,339 4.89 %
Federal funds sold and other
short-term investments
198,043 521 0.26 % 33,113 467 1.41 % 14,534 752 5.17 %
Total interest-earning assets (1) 1,528,909 70,335 4.60 % 1,276,877 74,609 5.84 % 1,212,680 83,589 6.89 %

Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks 31,918 29,343 29,766
Premises and equipment, net 5,201 4,976 5,303
Other, less allowance for loan losses 52,529 60,205 61,370
Total noninterest-earning assets 89,648 94,524 96,439
Total assets $ 1,618,557 $ 1,371,401 $ 1,309,119

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Savings, interest-bearing demand,
and money markets
$ 503,279 6,638 1.32 % $ 325,850 5,035 1.55 % $ 304,138 8,948 2.94 %
Time deposits 527,075 12,910 2.45 % 447,959 16,486 3.68 % 418,869 21,203 5.06 %
Total deposits 1,030,354 19,548 1.90 % 773,809 21,521 2.78 % 723,007 30,151 4.17 %
Other borrowed funds 232,894 7,088 3.04 % 285,249 9,910 3.47 % 274,721 13,672 4.98 %
Total interest-bearing liabilities 1,263,248 26,636 2.11 % 1,059,058 31,431 2.97 % 997,728 43,823 4.39 %

Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits 201,243 180,614 180,965
Other liabilities 10,903 13,639 13,743
Stockholders' equity 143,163 118,090 116,683
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 1,618,557 $ 1,371,401 $ 1,309,119

Net interest income/net interest spread (1) $ 43,699 2.49 % $ 43,178 2.87 % $ 39,766 2.50 %
Net interest margin (1) 2.86 % 3.38 % 3.28 %

1	Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using an incremental rate of 35% and is adjusted to reflect the effect of the nondeductible interest expense associated with owning tax-exempt investments.

2	~~Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans. Interest income collected on nonaccrual loans has been included.~~

3	~~Interest income on loans includes amortization of loan fees and costs, which are not material.~~

~~Net Interest Income~~

The Company’s largest component of net income is net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on earning assets, consisting primarily of loans and investments, and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, consisting of deposits and borrowings. Fluctuations in net interest income can result from the combination of changes in the balances of asset and liability categories and changes in interest rates. Interest rates earned and paid are also affected by general economic conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, and by competitive factors, government policies, and the action of regulatory authorities. Net interest margin for the year is a measure of the net return on interest-earning assets and is computed by dividing tax-equivalent net interest income b y the average of total interest-earning assets for the year.

For the years ending December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Company’s net interest margin was 2.86, 3.38, and 3.28 percent, respectively. Despite the drop in the net interest margin in 2009, tax-equivalent net interest income increased $521 as growth in earning assets exceeded growth in interest-bearing liabilities when compared to 2008. The high level of competition in the local markets, the Federal Reserves’ targeted federal funds rate of 0 to 25 basis points, and the high level of nonaccrual loans are expected to keep pressure on the net interest margin of the Company.

~~Rate and Volume Analysis~~

The rate and volume analysis shown below, on a tax-equivalent basis, is used to determine how much of the change in interest income or expense is the result of a change in volume or a change in interest yield or rate. The change in interest that is due to both volume and rate has been allocated to the change due to volume and the change due to rate in proportion to the absolute value of the change in each.

2009 Compared to 2008 2008 Compared to 2007
Volume Rate Total Volume Rate Total
Interest Income
Loans: (1)
Commercial $ 684 $ (3,423 ) $ (2,739 ) $ 2,559 $ (7,958 ) $ (5,399 )
Real estate (2) 2,231 (3,174 ) (943 ) 5,011 (5,957 ) (946 )
Consumer and other loans (225 ) 1 (224 ) (35 ) (132 ) (167 )
Total loans (including fees) 2,690 (6,596 ) (3,906 ) 7,535 (14,047 ) (6,512 )

Investment securities:
Taxable 1,545 (2,371 ) (826 ) (3,390 ) 395 (2,995 )
Tax-exempt (2) 131 273 404 321 491 812
Total investment securities 1,676 (2,098 ) (422 ) (3,069 ) 886 (2,183 )

Federal funds sold and other
short-term investments
700 (646 ) 54 516 (801 ) (285 )
Total interest income (2) 5,066 (9,340 ) (4,274 ) 4,982 (13,962 ) (8,980 )

Interest Expense
Deposits:
Savings, interest-bearing demand,
and money markets
2,425 (822 ) 1,603 599 (4,512 ) (3,913 )
Time deposits 2,575 (6,151 ) (3,576 ) 1,391 (6,108 ) (4,717 )
Total deposits 5,000 (6,973 ) (1,973 ) 1,990 (10,620 ) (8,630 )
Other borrowed funds (1,684 ) (1,138 ) (2,822 ) 506 (4,268 ) (3,762 )
Total interest expense 3,316 (8,111 ) (4,795 ) 2,496 (14,888 ) (12,392 )
Net interest income (2) $ 1,750 $ (1,229 ) $ 521 $ 2,486 $ 926 $ 3,412

1	~~Balances of nonaccrual loans have been included for computational purposes.~~

2	Tax-exempt income has been converted to a tax-equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 35% and is adjusted for the effect of the nondeductible interest expense associated with owning tax-exempt investments.

Tax-equivalent interest income and fees on loans declined $3,906 for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 2008, as the combination of lower rates and the continued high level of nonperforming loans exceeded the impact of the $45,487 increase in the average volume of outstanding loans. The average yield on loans declined to 5.46 percent for 2009, compared to 6.07 percent for 2008. The yield on the Company’s loan portfolio is affected by the mix of the portfolio, the effects of competition, the interest rate environment, the amount of nonperforming loans, and reversals of previously accrued interest on charged-off loans. The interest rate levels influence the volume of new loan originations and the mix of variable rate versus fixed rate loans. Loan pricing in the Company’s market areas remains competitive, while the demand for new loans has declined as business customers assess the ongoing effects of the slow economy.

The average balance of investment securities in 2009 grew $41,615 compared to 2008, while the yield fell 115 basis points. The decline in yield was partially caused by reversing a total of $198 of interest on securities deemed impaired during the year. Investment securities totaling approximately $191,500 were sold, called, or matured in 2009 while approximately $350,200 of investment securities were purchased. In order to decrease credit risk in the investment portfolio, certain trust preferred securities were sold in the second half of the year.

The average balance of federal funds sold and other short-term investments increased $164,930 during 2009. Despite the significant increase in volume, net interest income on these assets increased only $54 due to the 115 basis point drop in rates.

The average rate paid on deposits for the year ended December 31, 2009, declined to 1.90 percent from 2.78 percent for the year ended December 31, 2008. The significant drop in market rates paid caused interest expense to decline by $1,973 despite a sizable increase in average balances. The average balance of interest-bearing demand and savings accounts grew due to a $55,136 increase in average Reward Me checking account balances and a $99,104 increase in average SmartyPig® savings account balances. Both of these accounts pay interest at rates in excess of rates paid on short-term certificates of deposit. The average balance of time deposits increased over $79,000 compared to 2008. The balance is ex pected to remain high as more customers are participating in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program in order to obtain FDIC insurance on large deposits. CDARS is a program that coordinates, on a reciprocal basis, a network of banks to spread out deposits exceeding the FDIC insurance coverage limits to numerous institutions in order to provide insurance coverage for all participating deposits. Of the total deposits in the CDARS program as of December 31, 2009, 95 percent are on behalf of West Bank customers and are required to be classified as brokered deposits, but the nature of these deposits is not “brokered.”

The average rate paid on other borrowings declined by 43 basis points compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The average balance of other borrowings for 2009 was $52,355 lower than in 2008. Overnight borrowings in the form of federal funds purchased from correspondent banks and securities sold under agreements to repurchase averaged $39,123 less than in 2008. The average rate paid on overnight borrowings declined 186 basis points. Average long-term borrowings declined $13,203, while the rates paid on long-term borrowings increased 18 basis points compared to 2008. There were no changes in balances or rates of the outstanding subordinated notes. Those notes have a fixed rate until July 2010.

~~INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO~~

~~The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s securities available for sale for the three years indicated.~~

As of December 31
2009 2008 2007
U.S. Treasury and government agencies and corporations $ 177,890 $ 61,050 $ 118,994
State and political subdivisions 87,935 107,175 89,566
Mortgage-backed securities 64,578 1,234 1,835
Trust preferred securities 2,067 5,269 8,541
Corporate notes and other investments 8,008 6,656 12,491
Total $ 340,478 $ 181,384 $ 231,427

The investments presented in the following table are at carrying value and reported by contractual maturity as of the date indicated below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.

~~December 31, 2009~~

Within one
year

After one year
but within five
years

After five years
but within ten
years
After ten years Total
U.S. government agencies and corporations $ 18,259 $ 149,947 $ 9,684 $ - $ 177,890
State and political subdivisions 1,969 13,159 29,907 42,900 87,935
Mortgage-backed securities - 2,868 10,081 51,629 64,578
Trust preferred securities - - - 2,067 2,067
Corporate notes and other investments 2,189 4,766 753 300 8,008
Total $ 22,417 $ 170,740 $ 50,425 $ 96,896 $ 340,478

Weighted average yield:
U.S. government agencies and corporations 0.64 % 1.63 % 3.82 % -
State and political subdivisions (1) 5.43 % 7.36 % 5.55 % 6.38 %
Mortgage-backed securities - 3.56 % 2.01 % 1.00 %
Trust preferred securities - - - 2.67 %
Corporate notes and other investments 1.54 % 3.33 % 4.34 % -
Total 1.15 % 2.15 % 4.50 % 3.39 %

(1) Yields on tax-exempt obligations have been computed on a tax-equivalent basis using an incremental tax rate of 35% and are adjusted to reflect the effect of the nondeductible interest expense associated with owning tax-exempt investments.

The tables above include a pooled trust preferred security that is OTTI and has been placed on nonaccrual status. The accrual of interest on an investment security is discontinued when a security is deemed OTTI.

On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates the investment securities portfolio for those securities with a fair value below amortized cost. The review takes into consideration current market conditions, issuer rating changes and trends, the credit worthiness of the obligator of the security, current analysts’ evaluations, failure of the issuer to make scheduled interest or principal payments, the Company’s lack of intent to sell the security or whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery, as well as other qualitative factors. The term OTTI is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospect for a near-term recovery of value is not necessarily favorable. Any portion of su ch a decline in value associated with credit loss is recognized in earnings as an impairment loss with the remaining noncredit-related component being recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2009, existing unrealized losses of $4,682 are considered to be temporary in nature due to market interest rate fluctuations and illiquid markets, not estimated cash flows, and the Company has the ability and the intent to hold securities with unrealized losses for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery, which may be at maturity. The previously mentioned OTTI pooled trust preferred security has an unrealized loss of $3,455 as of December 31, 2009. The credit loss portion of the unrealized loss was recognized through earnings during 2009, and the remaining unrealized loss is included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss).

The Company engaged an independent consulting firm to assist in the valuation of this security. Based on the consulting firm’s findings, management determined the security had a December 31, 2009, estimated market value of $1,136 which resulted in $3,475 of total impairment. To determine the credit loss on this security, the investment consulting firm projected cash flows for the security and discounted the cash flows at the original purchased yield. The consulting firm analyzed each underlying bank or insurance company and assigned a probability of default. Those default assumptions were then used to determine the projected cash flows of the security. In addition, the consulting firm assumed no prepayments of the underlying debt. If the net present value of the ca sh flows was less than the cost basis of the security, the difference was considered credit-related and recorded through earnings. Based on this calculation, an additional $20 of credit loss was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2009, for a total credit loss of $310 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The remaining amortized cost of the security was reduced by this year-to-date recognized loss to create a new cost basis. The remaining change in fair market value of $3,455 is reflected in other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes of $1,313. The Company will continue to estimate the present value of cash flows expected to be collected over the life of the security.

At December 31, 2009, the most significant risk of a future impairment charge relates to West Bank’s investment in trust preferred securities of other banks. As of year end, three trust preferred securities with a cost basis of $6,926 were valued at $2,067. As previously mentioned, management has concluded that only the pooled trust preferred security is OTTI. Any potential future loss that would be considered a credit loss or an increase in the amount of the unrealized loss attributed to credit, would negatively impact net income and regulatory capital; however, as previously noted, the fair market value adjustment at December 31, 2009, has already been recorded against equity.

The state and political subdivisions investments are primarily in Iowa municipal bonds. Mortgage-backed securities consist of residential mortgage pass-through securities guaranteed by GNMA or issued by FNMA and real estate mortgage investment conduits guaranteed by FHLMC or GNMA. The debt obligations were all within the credit ratings acceptable under West Bank’s investment policy.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company did not have securities from a single issuer, except for the United States government or its agencies, which exceeded 10 percent of consolidated stockholders’ equity.

~~LOAN PORTFOLIO~~

~~Types of Loans~~

~~The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio as of the dates indicated.~~

As of December 31
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Commercial $ 356,885 $ 391,926 $ 364,994 $ 327,985 $ 311,086
Real estate:
Construction, land and land development 148,505 152,704 153,184 143,928 134,581
1-4 family residential 94,398 103,134 91,714 88,978 86,485
Commercial 413,063 441,444 360,255 328,514 321,561
Consumer and other loans 8,163 11,884 13,790 15,752 14,957
Total loans 1,021,014 1,101,092 983,937 905,157 868,670
Deferred loan fees, net 304 357 372 871 1,166
Total loans, net of deferred fees $ 1,020,710 $ 1,100,735 $ 983,565 $ 904,286 $ 867,504

As of December 31, 2009, the total amount of loans was approximately 81.9 percent of total deposits and 64.8 percent of total assets. As of December 31, 2009, the majority of all loans were originated directly by West Bank to borrowers within West Bank’s principal market areas. There were no non-U.S. loans outstanding during the years presented.

Commercial loans consist primarily of loans to businesses for various purposes, including revolving lines to finance current operations, inventory and accounts receivable, and capital expenditure loans to finance equipment and other fixed assets. These loans generally have short maturities, have either adjustable or fixed rates, and are either unsecured or secured by inventory, accounts receivable, and/or equipment.

Real estate loans include various types of loans for which West Bank holds real property as collateral, and consist of loans on commercial properties and single and multifamily residences. Real estate loans are typically structured to balloon in 5 years based upon generally having up to a 30 year amortization period. The majority of construction loan volume is to contractors and developers to construct commercial buildings or develop residential real estate, and generally have maturities of up to 24 months. West Bank originates residential real estate loans for its portfolio and for sale in the secondary market for a fee.

Consumer loans include loans extended to individuals for household, family, and other personal expenditures not secured by real estate. The majority of West Bank’s consumer lending is for vehicles, consolidation of personal debts, and household improvements.

The interest rates charged on loans vary with the degree of risk, the amount of the loan, and the maturity of the loan. Competitive pressures, market interest rates, the availability of funds, and government regulation further influence the rate charged on a loan.

West Bank follows a loan policy that has been approved by West Bank’s Board of Directors and is administered by West Bank’s management. The loan policy is reviewed at least annually and updated as considered necessary. This policy establishes lending limits, review criteria, and other guidelines such as loan administration and for the allowance for loan losses. Loans are approved by West Bank’s Board of Directors and/or designated officers in accordance with respective guidelines and underwriting policies of West Bank. Loans to any one borrower are limited by applicable state banking laws. Loan officer credit limits generally vary according to the individual loan officer’s experience and expertise.

The following tables show a breakdown of the three major components of West Bank’s loan portfolio (commercial, construction, and commercial real estate) net of unamortized fees and costs as of December 31, 2009.

Commercial loans:
December 31, 2009
$ %
Finance and insurance
$ 88,960 25 %
Real estate and rental/leasing 42,747 12 %
Manufacturing 41,112 12 %
Publishing, broadcasting and information services 28,987 8 %
Construction 5,019 1 %
Wholesale trade 10,946 3 %
Building trades 20,121 6 %
Transportation and warehousing 12,367 3 %
Retail 10,125 3 %
Arts, entertainment and recreation 11,091 3 %
Other 85,545 24 %
$ 357,020 100 %

Construction loans:
December 31, 2009
$ %
Land development:
1-4 family $ 17,486 12 %
Other construction and development 19,596 13 %
Construction:
1-4 family:
Owner occupied 4,325 3 %
Nonowner occupied 20,466 14 %
Multifamily 8,899 6 %
Industrial, commercial and other 77,733 52 %
$ 148,505 100 %

Commercial real estate loans:
December 31, 2009
$ %
Owner occupied $ 203,432 49 %
Nonowner occupied:
Medical/retirement 51,731 13 %
Retail 47,225 12 %
Multifamily 34,321 8 %
Office 38,424 9 %
Warehouse 15,123 4 %
Hotel 8,440 2 %
Other 13,743 3 %
Total nonowner occupied 209,007 51 %
$ 412,439 100 %

~~Maturities of Loans~~

The contractual maturities of the Company’s loan portfolio are as shown in the following table. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because individual borrowers may have the right to prepay loans with or without prepayment penalties.

Loans as of December 31, 2009

Within one
year

After one but
within five
years

After five
years
Total
Commercial $ 203,297 $ 142,727 $ 10,861 $ 356,885
Real estate:
Construction, land and land development 100,858 45,458 2,189 148,505
1-4 family residential 25,096 49,958 19,344 94,398
Commercial 60,330 272,756 79,977 413,063
Consumer and other loans 3,895 3,841 427 8,163
Total loans $ 393,476 $ 514,740 $ 112,798 $ 1,021,014

After one but
within five
years

After five
years

Loan maturities after one year with:
Fixed rates $ 480,756 $ 67,352
Variable rates 33,984 45,446
$ 514,740 $ 112,798

~~Risk Elements~~

~~The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s nonperforming assets as of the dates indicated.~~

Years Ended December 31
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Nonaccrual loans $ 12,350 $ 21,367 $ 5,469 $ 495 $ 4,145
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest 1,150 92 408 155 767
Restructured loans 12,817 7,376 - - -
Total nonperforming loans 26,317 28,835 5,877 650 4,912
Other real estate owned 25,350 4,352 155 2,002 497
Nonaccrual investment securities 1,282 2,575 - - -
Total nonperforming assets $ 52,949 $ 35,762 $ 6,032 $ 2,652 $ 5,409

Nonperforming loans to total loans 2.58 % 2.62 % 0.60 % 0.07 % 0.57 %
Nonperforming assets to total assets 3.36 % 2.30 % 0.45 % 0.21 % 0.43 %

The accrual of interest on past due and other impaired loans is generally discontinued when loan payments are past due 90 days or when, in the opinion of management, the borrower may be unable to make payments as they become due. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received. In certain cases, interest may continue to accrue on loans past due more than 90 days when the value of the collateral is sufficient to cover both the principal amount of the loan and accrued interest. Interest income on restructured loans is recognized pursuant to the terms of the new loan agreement. Interest income on other impaired loans is monitored and based upon the terms of the underlying loan agreement. However, the recorded net investment in impaired loans, including accrued interest, is limited to the present value of the expected cash flows of the impair ed loan or the observable fair market value of the loan’s collateral.

Outstanding loans of approximately $46,727 were placed on nonaccrual status during 2009, with total nonaccrual loans equaling $12,350 as of December 31, 2009. Approximately $13,525 of charge-offs were recorded in 2009 related to nonaccrual loans and a portion was transferred to other real estate owned. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when there is doubt as to the collectability of scheduled principal and interest payments. A loan may be removed from nonaccrual status when payments have resumed and it is reasonable to expect continued payment performance. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, interest income that would have been recorded during the nonaccrual period under the original terms of such loans was approximately $1,411, $795, and $70, respectively.

A loan is considered restructured when the interest rate is materially reduced or the term is extended beyond the original maturity date because of the inability of the borrower to service the loan at market terms. These loans are accounted for as impaired until performance is established. The average balance of all impaired loans during 2009 was approximately $50,919. Interest income recognized on impaired loans in 2009 was approximately $1,808 and was immaterial in 2008 and 2007.

As of December 31, 2009, West Bank had identified approximately $11,711 of loans to three real estate developers, $7,629 to three commercial customers which are real estate secured, and $5,000 to a bank holding company as potential problem loans. None of these loans were in default at the end of the year. It is not now possible to predict the degree of problems these loans may develop. However, West Bank is closely monitoring each of them.

~~The composition of other real estate owned as of December 31, 2009, is shown in the following table.~~

Construction, land development, and other land $ 8,596
1-4 family residential properties 3,918
Commercial properties 12,836
$ 25,350

West Bank is actively marketing the assets included in the previous table. Unfortunately, demand for commercial real estate and development land is weak. Valuations of other real estate owned are periodically performed by management so that the properties are carried at current market value less estimated disposal costs. Market values are determined by obtaining updated appraisals or other market information. The construction and land development category includes five properties in the Des Moines metropolitan area and one property in the Iowa City market. The 1-4 family properties consist of eight homes and a 22-unit townhome project, with 16 of the units currently rented. Two homes with carrying values totaling $757 have been sold in the first two months of 2010. The commercial properties consist of seven properties, including five commercial facilities, one of which was sold in January 2010, a private golf course, and a church, which has been sold in January 2010 via a real estate contract at the carrying value of $3,500.

~~SUMMARY OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES~~

The provision for loan losses represents charges made to earnings to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses is management’s best estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. Factors considered in establishing an appropriate allowance include: an assessment of the financial condition of the borrower; a realistic determination of value and adequacy of underlying collateral; the condition of the local economy and the condition of the specific industry of the borrower; an analysis of the levels and trends of loan categories; and a review of delinquent and classified loans.

The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is evaluated quarterly by management and reviewed by West Bank’s Board of Directors. This evaluation focuses on factors such as specific loan reviews, changes in the components of the loan portfolio given the current and forecasted economic conditions, and historical loss experience. Any one of the following conditions may result in the review of a specific loan: concern about whether the customer’s cash flow or net worth is sufficient to repay the loan; delinquency status; criticism of the loan in a regulatory examination; the suspension of interest accrual; or other factors, including whether the loan has other special or unusual characteristics that suggest special monitoring is warranted.

While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, further reduction in the carrying amounts of loans may be necessary based on changes in circumstances or later acquired information. Furthermore, changes in future economic activity are always uncertain. Identifiable sectors within the general economy are subject to additional volatility, which at any time may have a substantial impact on the loan portfolio. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the estimated losses on loans. Such agencies may require West Bank to recognize additional losses based on their judgment about information available to them at the time of their examination.

~~Change in the Allowance for Loan Losses~~

West Bank’s policy is to charge off loans when, in management’s opinion, the loan is deemed uncollectible, although concerted efforts are made to maximize future recoveries. The following table summarizes activity in the Company’s allowance for loan losses for the years indicated, including amounts of loans charged off, amounts of recoveries, additions to the allowance charged to income, and related ratios.

Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses for the Years
Ended December 31
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Balance at beginning of period $ 15,441 $ 8,935 $ 8,494 $ 7,615 $ 6,527
Charge-offs:
Commercial 8,495 8,993 1,741 776 685
Real estate:
Construction, land and land development 2,859 952 - 295 6
1-4 family residential 1,685 130 356 9 69
Commercial 3,551 36 - - -
Consumer and other loans 4,790 259 45 60 63
21,380 10,370 2,142 1,140 823

Recoveries:
Commercial 493 236 191 270 78
Real estate:
Construction, land and land development 20 - - 6 -
1-4 family residential 19 22 20 1 22
Commercial - - - - -
Consumer and other loans 33 18 22 17 36
565 276 233 294 136
Net charge-offs 20,815 10,094 1,909 846 687
Provision for loan losses charged to operations 24,500 16,600 2,350 1,725 1,775
Balance at end of period $ 19,126 $ 15,441 $ 8,935 $ 8,494 $ 7,615

Average loans outstanding $ 1,100,045 $ 1,054,558 $ 945,669 $ 918,992 $ 785,164
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to
average loans outstanding
1.89 % 0.96 % 0.20 % 0.09 % 0.09 %
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to average
loans outstanding
1.74 % 1.46 % 0.94 % 0.92 % 0.97 %

As the previous table indicates, the provision for loan losses and the charge-off of commercial, construction and land development, commercial real estate, and consumer loans are the most significant changes in the reserve level for the five-year period presented. The net charge-off ratio for 2009 was 1.89 percent, which was a historical high for the Company. According to the September 2009 Bank Holding Company Performance Report prepared by the Federal Reserve Board’s Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation, the percentage of net charge-offs to average loans for all banks with total assets between $1 billion and $3 billion was 1.18 percent for the first nine months of 2009.

Commercial charge-offs in 2009 included $5,770 related to three customers, including additional charge-offs for a customer who had a fraud committed against his company during 2008. Real estate construction charge-offs included a loan to one home builder that accounted for $1,515 of the reported 2009 charge-offs in this category. 2009 commercial real estate charge-offs included one loan to a private golf course that totaled $2,634. Charge-offs in 2009 also included one unsecured consumer loan of $4,612, whereby West Bank was in the process of collecting a past due loan made to an individual who had been a long-time customer of West Bank when it discovered an apparent misrepresentation of assets. The 2009 provision for loan losses increased because of these specific problem loans and as a resu lt of the economy remaining in a recession with significant difficulty being experienced in the construction and real estate development, commercial real estate, and commercial business sectors.

Factors that are considered when determining the adequacy of the allowance include loan concentrations, loan growth, the economic outlook, and historical losses. The Company’s concentration risks include geographic concentration in central Iowa. The local economy is comprised primarily of service industries and state and county governments.

West Bank has a significant portion of its loan portfolio in commercial real estate loans, commercial lines of credit, commercial term loans, and construction or land development loans. West Bank’s typical commercial borrower is a small or medium-sized, privately-owned Iowa business person or entity. West Bank’s commercial loans typically have greater credit risks than residential mortgage or consumer loans because they often have larger balances and repayment usually depends on the borrowers’ successful business operations. Commercial loans also involve additional risks, because they generally are not fully repaid over the loan period and, thus, usually require refinancing or a large payoff at maturity. When the economy turns downward, which is currently the case, commercia l borrowers may not be able to repay their loans and the value of their assets, which are usually pledged as collateral, may decrease rapidly and significantly. Although management believes that the real estate markets in which West Bank makes loans are not as depressed as in some other parts of the country, we believe that real estate-related credit risks continue to be higher than normal in our markets.�� The current economic conditions in West Bank’s market areas are putting considerable negative pressure on our existing loan customers and are limiting our ability to make attractive new loans.

Nonperforming assets have been relatively stable for the last half of 2009. We are experiencing changes in the components of nonperforming assets as certain loans move from nonaccrual status to other real estate owned to ultimate disposition. The amounts being realized from the sale of other real estate owned have been reasonably close to the carrying value, which indicates the valuation process for impaired loans has validity.

~~Breakdown of Allowance for Loan Losses by Category~~

~~The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s allocation of the allowance for loan losses as of the dates indicated.~~

2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Amount %* Amount %* Amount %* Amount %* Amount %*
Balance at end of period applicable to:
Commercial $ 7,988 34.95 % $ 9,177 35.59 % $ 2,762 37.10 % $ 2,068 36.23 % $ 2,717 35.81 %
Real estate:
Construction, land and
land development
3,260 14.54 % 2,310 13.87 % 1,267 15.57 % 1,168 15.90 % 532 15.49 %
1-4 family residential 1,303 9.25 % 566 9.37 % 1,345 9.32 % 1,141 9.84 % 894 9.96 %
Commercial 6,438 40.46 % 3,227 40.09 % 3,475 36.61 % 3,985 36.29 % 3,326 37.02 %
Consumer and other loans 137 0.80 % 161 1.08 % 86 1.40 % 132 1.74 % 146 1.72 %
$ 19,126 100.00 % $ 15,441 100.00 % $ 8,935 100.00 % $ 8,494 100.00 % $ 7,615 100.00 %

*Percent of loans in each category to total loans.

The allocation of the allowance for loan losses is dependent upon the change in balances outstanding in the various categories, the historical net loss experience by category, which can vary over time, and management’s assessment of economic factors that may influence potential losses in the loan portfolio. The allocation of the allowance includes specific reserves of $3,185 in the commercial category for twelve borrowers, $1,500 in the construction, land and land development category for one borrower, and $250 in the commercial real estate category for one borrower. The increase in the allowance related to commercial real estate loans as of December 31, 2009, compared to December 31, 2008, was due to an increase in the economic considerations factor.

~~DEPOSITS~~

The Company’s primary source of funds is customer deposits. Total deposits as of December 31, 2009 were approximately $1,247,000, an increase of 7.9 percent compared to the end of 2008. All deposit categories except certificates of deposit increased during this time period. Three factors caused certificates of deposit to decline approximately $208,500 compared to December 31, 2008. Those factors included one customer who opted to move a portion of their CDARS deposits into other investment vehicles, letting West Bank’s wholesale CDARS deposits mature, and West Bank’s decision to reduce public funds.

In order to maintain and build core deposits, West Bank began an extensive sales campaign for a new product called “Reward Me Checking” in April 2008. The product pays an incentive rate if the customer performs a certain number of electronic banking transactions each month and agrees to receive electronic statements. Deposits in this product grew by approximately $45,000 during 2009. In addition, West Bank is the bank for a savings program called SmartyPig®~~. SmartyPig~~® ~~is an innovative, internet-based savings and rewards program developed by SmartyPig, LLC. As of December 31, 2009, this program had gather ed approximately $187,400 in deposits. The SmartyPig~~® deposits are expected to be transferred to a larger bank during 2010. An additional strategy for gathering and retaining core deposits was added in July 2008 and was in place through December 2009. New and current customers with a primary checking account at West Bank were eligible for a 50 basis point higher rate on time certificates. West Bank also offers a variety of interest-bearing accounts designed to attract both short-term and longer-term deposits. Interest-bearing accounts earn interest at rates established by West Bank based on competitive factors and its need for funds.

While approximately 88 percent of West Bank’s certificates of deposit mature in the next year, it is anticipated that a majority of these certificates will be renewed. Rate-sensitive certificates of deposit in excess of $100,000 experience somewhat higher volatility with regard to renewal volume as West Bank adjusts rates based upon funding needs. In December 2009, management was utilizing wholesale deposits of $47,548 as a source of funding. Of the total wholesale deposits, approximately $35,882 are certificates of deposit, with approximately $30,000 maturing within one year. In the event a substantial volume of certificates is not renewed, management believes the Company has sufficient liquid assets and borrowing lines to fund significant runoff. A sustained reduction in de posit volume would have a significant negative impact on the Company’s operations and liquidity.

~~The following table sets forth the average balances for each major category of deposits and the weighted average interest rate paid for deposits during the years indicated.~~

Average Deposits by Type
2009 2008 2007
Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate
Noninterest-bearing demand $ 201,243 - $ 180,614 - $ 180,965 -

Interest-bearing demand:
Reward Me checking 69,779 3.29 % 14,643 3.97 % - -
Other interest-bearing demand 66,925 0.27 % 72,621 0.88 % 75,013 2.44 %
Money market 227,014 0.72 % 200,569 1.74 % 190,044 3.52 %
Savings:
SmartyPig® savings
102,144 2.33 % 3,040 3.89 % - -
Other savings 37,417 0.36 % 34,977 0.61 % 39,081 1.08 %
Time certificates 527,075 2.45 % 447,959 3.68 % 418,869 5.06 %
$ 1,231,597 $ 954,423 $ 903,972

~~Certificates of Deposit~~

~~The following table shows the amounts and remaining maturities of time certificates of deposit with balances of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2009.~~

3 months or less $ 77,164
Over 3 through 6 months 59,988
Over 6 through 12 months 123,937
Over 12 months 10,056
$ 271,145

~~BORROWED FUNDS~~

~~The following table summarizes the outstanding amount of and the weighted average rate on borrowed funds as of the dates indicated.~~

As of December 31
2009 2008 2007
Balance Rate Balance Rate Balance Rate
Subordinated notes $ 20,619 7.14 % $ 20,619 7.14 % $ 20,619 7.14 %
FHLB advances and other borrowings 125,000 4.18 % 125,000 4.18 % 103,000 4.58 %
Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
40,342 0.45 % 93,111 0.48 % 166,930 4.16 %
Other short-term borrowings 2,553 0.00 % 245 0.00 % 2,672 4.00 %
$ 188,514 3.65 % $ 238,975 2.99 % $ 293,221 4.51 %

Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances and other borrowings at December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008, consisted of only FHLB advances. At December 31, 2007, this category also included a note payable to a correspondent bank. Other short-term borrowings as of the end of each year consisted of Treasury, Tax, and Loan Option Notes.

~~The following tables set forth the average amount of, the average rate paid, and the maximum outstanding balance on borrowed funds for the years indicated.~~

Years Ended December 31
2009 2008 2007

Average
Balance

Average
Rate

Average
Balance

Average
Rate

Average
Balance

Average
Rate

Subordinated notes $ 20,619 7.14 % $ 20,619 7.14 % $ 20,619 7.14 %
FHLB advances and other borrowings 125,000 4.24 % 138,203 4.06 % 107,675 4.72 %
Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
85,987 0.37 % 125,110 2.23 % 139,622 4.85 %
Other short-term borrowings 1,288 0.00 % 1,317 2.98 % 6,805 5.07 %
$ 232,894 3.04 % $ 285,249 3.47 % $ 274,721 4.98 %

2009 2008 2007
Maximum amount outstanding during the year:
Subordinated notes $ 20,619 $ 20,619 $ 20,619
FHLB advances and other borrowings 125,000 153,000 115,400
Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
136,613 198,917 199,205
Other short-term borrowings 4,047 21,769 52,475

~~OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS~~

In the normal course of business, West Bank commits to extend credit in the form of loan commitments and standby letters of credit in order to meet the financing needs of its customers. These commitments expose West Bank to varying degrees of credit and market risks in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets and are subject to the same credit policies as are loans recorded on the balance sheets.

West Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. West Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, West Bank had commitments to extend credit of approximately $202,000 and $301,000, respectively, and standby letters of credit of approximately $18,000 and $20,000, respectively.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. West Bank evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained is based on management’s credit evaluation of the party. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment, residential real estate, and commercial properties.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by West Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. Collateral held varies as specified above, and is required in instances the Company deems necessary. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third party, West Bank would be required to fund the commitment. The maximum potential amount of future payments West Bank could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount disclosed above. If a commi tment is funded, West Bank would be entitled to seek recovery from the customer. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, no amounts had been recorded as liabilities for West Bank’s potential obligations under these guarantees.

In February 2008, West Bank executed a Mortgage Partnership Finance (MPF) Master Commitment (the Commitment) with the FHLB of Des Moines to deliver mortgage loans and to guarantee the payment of any realized losses that exceed the FHLB’s first loss account for mortgages delivered under the Commitment. West Bank receives credit enhancement fees from the FHLB for providing this guarantee and continuing to assist in managing the credit risk of the MPF Program mortgage loans. The term of the Commitment and guarantee per the Master Commitment is through March 18, 2010. (West Bank expects to enter into a new commitment upon the expiration of the current commitment.) At December 31, 2009, any liability represented by the present value of the credit enhancement fees less any expected losses in the mortgages delivered under the Commitment was immaterial. West Bank has not experienced any losses under these guarantees.

~~CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS~~

~~The following table sets forth the balance of contractual obligations by maturity period as of December 31, 2009.~~

Payments due by period
Total
Less than
one year

One to
three years

Three to
five years

More than
five years

Subordinated notes $ 20,619 $ - $ - $ - $ 20,619
FHLB advances 125,000 20,000 - - 105,000
Operating lease commitments 16,524 1,610 2,559 2,187 10,168
Total $ 162,143 $ 21,610 $ 2,559 $ 2,187 $ 135,787

~~LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES~~

The objective of liquidity management is to ensure the availability of sufficient cash flows to meet all financial commitments and to capitalize on opportunities for profitable business expansion. The Company’s principal source of funds is deposits. Other sources include loan principal repayments, proceeds from the maturity and sale of investment securities, federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements, advances from the FHLB, and funds provided by operations. Liquidity management is conducted on both a daily and a long-term basis. Investments in liquid assets are adjusted based on expected loan demand, projected loan maturities and payments, expected deposit flows, and the objectives set by West Bank’s asset-liability management policy. The Company had liquid assets (cash and cash equivalents) of $131,495 at December 31, 2009, a decline of $65,474 from December 31, 2008. West Bank had additional borrowing capacity available from the FHLB of approximately $45,000 at December 31, 2009. In addition, West Bank has $63,000 in borrowing capacity available through unsecured federal funds lines of credit with correspondent banks. West Bank was not drawing on any of these lines of credit as of December 31, 2009. Net cash from continuing operating activities contributed $16,733, $26,992, and $19,902 to liquidity for the years 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. These cash flows from operations are expected to continue in the foreseeable future.

~~As previously discussed, as of December 31, 2009, deposits included $187,400 related to the SmartyPig~~® ~~savings program. West Bank believes the SmartyPig~~® deposits are becoming a disproportionate percentage of its total deposits. Accordingly, West Bank has asked SmartyPig, LLC to move the program to a larger bank in 2010. The combination of high levels of potentially liquid assets, cash flows from operations, and additional borrowing capacity provided strong liquidity for the Company at December 31, 2009, and are sufficient to accommodate any 2010 transfer of the SmartyPig® ~~related accounts.~~

On December 31, 2008, the Company received $36,000 from the Treasury in exchange for 36,000 shares of cumulative senior preferred stock and a warrant to purchase 474,100 shares of common stock under the CPP. The senior preferred shares qualify as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes and rank senior to common stock and bear a cumulative dividend rate of five percent per annum for the first five years they are outstanding and a rate of nine percent per annum thereafter. The Board of Directors and management believed it was prudent to participate in the CPP because (i) the cost of capital under the program was significantly lower than the cost of capital otherwise available to the Company at the time, and (ii) despite being well-capitalized, additional capital provided the Company and West Bank additional flexibili ty to meet future capital needs during the current uncertain economic environment. Of the total received, $34,000 was transferred into capital in West Bank and $2,000 was used to pay off long-term debt at the Company. Management does not anticipate repaying the CPP funds in 2010.

The Company’s total stockholders’ equity declined to $133,059 at December 31, 2009, from $150,063 at December 31, 2008. The change in equity was due to the 2009 loss from continuing and discontinued operations and dividends paid. At December 31, 2009, stockholders’ equity was 8.45 percent of total assets, compared to 9.65 percent at December 31, 2008. The Company’s tangible common equity ratio was 6.27 percent at December 31, 2009 compared to 5.91 percent a year earlier. No material capital expenditures or material changes in the capital resource mix are anticipated at this time. The capital levels of the Company exceed applicable regulatory guidelines as of December 31, 2009, to be considered well-capitalized.

~~INTEREST RATE RISK~~

Interest rate risk refers to the exposure to earnings and capital arising from changes in interest rates. Management’s objectives are to manage interest rate risk to work for consistent growth of earnings and capital. Interest rate risk management focuses on fluctuations in net interest income identified through computer simulations used to evaluate volatility, interest rate, spread, and volume assumptions. This risk is quantified and compared against tolerance levels.

The Company uses a purchased computer software simulation modeling program to measure its exposure to potential interest rate changes. For various assumed hypothetical changes in market interest rates, this analysis measures the estimated change in net interest income.

Another measure of interest rate sensitivity is the gap ratio. This ratio indicates the amount of interest-earning assets repricing within a given period in comparison to the amount of interest-bearing liabilities repricing within the same period of time. A gap ratio of 1.0 indicates a matched position, in which case the effect on net interest income due to interest rate movements will be minimal. A gap ratio of less than 1.0 indicates that more liabilities than assets reprice within the time period, and a ratio greater than 1.0 indicates that more assets reprice than liabilities. The Company’s gap ratio is shown on the following page.

~~QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK~~

The Company’s market risk is comprised primarily of interest rate risk arising from its core banking activities of lending and deposit taking. Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates may adversely affect the Company’s net interest income. Management continually develops and applies strategies to mitigate this risk. Management does not believe that the Company’s primary market risk exposure and management of that exposure in 2009 materially changed compared to 2008.

~~The following table presents the estimated change in net interest income for the coming twelve months under several scenarios of assumed interest rate changes for the rate shock levels shown:~~

~~Scenario~~	~~% Change~~
~~300 basis points rising~~		~~-3.18~~	%
~~200 basis points rising~~		~~-4.33~~	%
~~100 basis points rising~~		~~-3.00~~	%
~~Base~~		-

As of December 31, 2009, the estimated effect of an immediate 300 basis point increase in interest rates would cause the Company’s net interest income to decrease by approximately 3.18 percent, or $1,300, in 2010. The estimated effect of an immediate decrease in rates is not reasonably calculable due to the current historically-low interest rate environment. Because the majority of liabilities subject to interest rate movements in the short term are of the type that generally lag interest rate movements in the market, they do not change by the same magnitude in the short term as the change in market rates.

Computations of the prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions. Actual values may differ from those projections set forth above. Further, the computations do not contemplate any actions the Company may undertake in response to changes in interest rates.

The following table sets forth the estimated maturity or repricing, and the resulting interest sensitivity gap, of the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the cumulative interest sensitivity gap at December 31, 2009. The expected maturities are presented on a contractual basis or, if more relevant, are based on projected call dates. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because of prepayment assumptions and early withdrawal of deposits.

3 months
or less

Over 3
through 12
months

Over 1
through
5 years

Over
5 years
Total
Interest-earning assets:
Loans $ 508,727 $ 117,212 $ 362,247 $ 32,856 $ 1,021,042
Securities available for sale 4,984 21,261 223,034 91,199 340,478
Federal funds sold and other
        short-term investments
103,572 - - - 103,572
Federal Home Loan Bank stock - - - 10,791 10,791
Total interest-earning assets 617,283 138,473 585,281 134,846 1,475,883

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Savings, money market and
     interest-bearing demand
604,442 - - - 604,442
Time 143,064 240,787 51,353 559 435,763
Federal funds purchased and securities
        sold under agreement to repurchase
40,342 - - - 40,342
Other short-term borrowings 2,553 - - - 2,553
Long-term borrowings 20,000 20,619 - 105,000 145,619
Total interest-bearing liabilities 810,401 261,406 51,353 105,559 1,228,719

Interest sensitivity gap per period $ (193,118 ) $ (122,933 ) $ 533,928 $ 29,287 $ 247,164
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap $ (193,118 ) $ (316,051 ) $ 217,877 $ 247,164 $ 247,164
Interest sensitivity gap ratio 0.76 0.53 11.40 1.28 1.20
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap ratio 0.76 0.71 1.19 1.20 1.20

As of December 31, 2009, the Company’s cumulative gap ratio for assets and liabilities repricing within one year was 0.71, meaning that the Company is liability sensitive over the cumulative 12-month period. In other words, more interest-bearing liabilities will be subject to repricing within that time frame than interest-earning assets. However, the majority of the interest-bearing liabilities subject to repricing within these time frames are savings, money market, and interest–bearing demand deposits. These types of deposits generally do not reprice as quickly or by the same magnitude as changes in other short-term interest rates.

~~STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH~~

The following performance graph provides information regarding cumulative, five-year return (loss) on an indexed basis of the common stock as compared with the Nasdaq – Total US Index and the SNL Midwest Bank Index prepared by SNL Financial L.C. of Charlottesville, Virginia. The latter index reflects the performance of bank holding companies operating principally in the Midwest as selected by SNL Financial. The indices assume the investment of $100 on December 31, 2004, in the common stock, the Nasdaq – Total US Index, and the SNL Midwest Bank Index, with all dividends reinvested. The Company’s stock price performance shown in the following graph is not indicative of future stock price performance.

Period Ending
Index 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 12/31/08 12/31/09
West Bancorporation, Inc. 100.00 110.01 113.63 86.91 86.10 35.00
NASDAQ Composite 100.00 101.37 111.03 121.92 72.49 104.31
SNL Midwest Bank Index 100.00 96.36 111.38 86.81 57.11 48.40

~~EFFECTS OF NEW STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS~~

~~A discussion of the effects of new financial accounting standards and developments as they relate to the Company is located in Note 1 of the following audited financial statements.~~

~~INFLATION~~

The primary impact of inflation on the Company’s operations is increased asset yields, deposit costs, and operating overhead. Unlike most industries, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than they would have on non-financial companies. Although interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services, increases in inflation generally have resulted in increased interest rates. The effects of inflation can magnify the growth of assets and, if significant, require that equity capital increase at a faster rate than otherwise would be necessary.

~~"SAFE HARBOR" STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT~~

The information contained in this report may contain forward-looking statements about the Company’s growth and acquisition strategies, new products and services, and future financial performance, including earnings and dividends per share, return on average assets, return on average equity, efficiency ratio, and capital ratios. Certain statements in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “should,” or “anticipates,” or similar references or references to estimates or predictions. Such forward-looking statements are based upon certain underlying as sumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Because of the possibility that the underlying assumptions are incorrect or do not materialize in the future, actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that may affect future results include: interest rate risk; competitive pressures; pricing pressures on loans and deposits; changes in credit and other risks posed by the Company’s loan and investment portfolios, including declines in commercial or residential real estate values or changes in the allowance for loan losses dictated by new market conditions or regulatory requirements; actions of bank and non-bank competitors; changes in local and national economic conditions; changes in regulatory requirements and costs, including actions of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Department of the Treasury, the Iowa Division of Banking, and/or the Federal Reserve Board; changes in the Treasu ry’s Capital Purchase Program; and customers’ acceptance of the Company’s products and services. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update such forward-looking statements to reflect current or future events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

~~Report~~ ~~of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~

~~To the Board of Directors and Stockholders~~

~~West Bancorporation, Inc.~~

~~West Des Moines, Iowa~~

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of West Bancorporation, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of West Bancorporation, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), West Bancorporation, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in ~~Internal Control - Integrated Framework~~, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 12, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of West Bancorporation, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting.

~~/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP~~

~~Des Moines, Iowa~~

~~March 12, 2010~~

~~McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is an independent member firm of RSM International,~~

~~an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities.~~

~~Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~

~~To the Board of Directors and Stockholders~~

~~West Bancorporation, Inc.~~

~~West Des Moines, Iowa~~

~~We have audited West Bancorporation, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in~~ ~~Internal Control - Integrated Framework~~, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). West Bancorporation, Inc. and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with autho rizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, West Bancorporation, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in ~~Internal Control - Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).~~

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the balance sheets of West Bancorporation, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, and our report dated March 12, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion.

~~/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP~~

~~Des Moines, Iowa~~

~~March 12, 2010~~

~~McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is an independent member firm of RSM International,~~

~~an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities.~~

~~Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting~~

The management of West Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

West Bancorporation, Inc.’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in ~~Internal Control - Integrated Framework~~. Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2009, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. The independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements included in the annual report has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

~~/s/ David R. Milligan~~

~~David R. Milligan~~

~~Chief Executive Officer~~

~~/s/ Douglas R. Gulling~~

~~Douglas R. Gulling~~

~~Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer~~

~~March 12, 2010~~

West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2009 and 2008

(in thousands, except per share data) 2009 2008
ASSETS

Cash and due from banks $ 27,923 $ 23,712
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments 103,572 173,257
Cash and cash equivalents 131,495 196,969
Securities available for sale 340,478 181,384
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost 10,791 8,174
Loans held for sale 332 1,018
Loans 1,020,710 1,100,735
Allowance for loan losses (19,126 ) (15,441 )
Loans, net 1,001,584 1,085,294
Premises and equipment, net 5,290 4,639
Accrued interest receivable 5,502 6,415
Goodwill - 13,376
Bank-owned life insurance 25,400 25,277
Other real estate owned 25,350 4,352
Deferred tax assets 12,823 6,203
Other assets 16,009 7,200
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale - 13,975
Total assets $ 1,575,054 $ 1,554,276

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand $ 206,412 $ 174,980
Interest-bearing demand 162,305 97,853
Savings 442,137 238,058
Time of $100,000 or more 271,145 274,825
Other time 164,618 369,416
Total deposits 1,246,617 1,155,132
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase 40,342 93,111
Other short-term borrowings 2,553 245
Subordinated notes 20,619 20,619
Federal Home Loan Bank advances 125,000 125,000
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 6,864 8,783
Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale - 1,323
Total liabilities 1,441,995 1,404,213

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share;
     authorized 50,000,000 shares; 36,000 shares issued and outstanding
     at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively
34,024 33,548
Common stock, no par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares; 17,403,882 shares
     issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively
3,000 3,000
Additional paid-in capital 34,387 34,452
Retained earnings 65,959 82,793
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) (4,311 ) (3,730 )
Total stockholders’ equity 133,059 150,063
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 1,575,054 $ 1,554,276

~~See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

(in thousands, except per share data) 2009 2008 2007
Interest income:
Loans, including fees $ 59,309 $ 63,525 $ 70,155
Securities:
U.S. Treasury, government agencies and corporations 2,436 2,903 5,834
States and political subdivisions 4,322 4,152 3,742
Corporate notes and other investments 1,142 1,485 1,544
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments 521 467 752
Total interest income 67,730 72,532 82,027
Interest expense:
Demand deposits 2,481 1,223 1,830
Savings deposits 4,157 3,812 7,118
Time deposits 12,910 16,486 21,203
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase
320 2,788 6,769
Other short-term borrowings - 39 345
Subordinated notes 1,472 1,476 1,472
Other borrowings 5,296 5,607 5,086
Total interest expense 26,636 31,431 43,823
Net interest income 41,094 41,101 38,204
Provision for loan losses 24,500 16,600 2,350
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 16,594 24,501 35,854
Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts 4,021 4,832 4,794
Trust services 786 789 758
Gains and fees on sales of residential mortgages 1,114 544 161
Increase in cash value of bank-owned life insurance 776 936 890
Gain from bank-owned life insurance 840 - -
Other income 2,095 1,866 1,822
Total noninterest income 9,632 8,967 8,425
Investment securities gains (losses), net:
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses (3,444 ) (4,739 ) -
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive
income (loss) before taxes
832 - -
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings (2,612 ) (4,739 ) -
Realized securities gains, net 1,884 73 5
Investment securities gains (losses), net (728 ) (4,666 ) 5
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits 9,938 9,257 9,187
Occupancy 3,451 2,992 2,916
Data processing 1,761 1,748 1,706
FDIC insurance expense 2,736 606 109
Goodwill impairment 13,376 - -
Other expenses 6,643 5,502 3,952
Total noninterest expense 37,905 20,105 17,870

~~(Continued on next page)~~

West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations (continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

(in thousands, except per share data) 2009 2008 2007
Income (loss) before income taxes (12,407 ) 8,697 26,414
Income taxes (benefits) (7,356 ) 1,386 8,062
Income (loss) from continuing operations (5,051 ) 7,311 18,352
Discontinued operations:
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes (10,262 ) 563 982
Income taxes (benefits) (696 ) 238 414
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (9,566 ) 325 568
Net income (loss) (14,617 ) 7,636 18,920
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount (2,276 ) - -
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders $ (16,893 ) $ 7,636 $ 18,920

Earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share
from continuing operations
$ (0.42 ) $ 0.42 $ 1.05
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share
from discontinued operations
$ (0.55 ) $ 0.02 $ 0.03
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share $ (0.97 ) $ 0.44 $ 1.08

~~See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

(in thousands, except per share data) 2009 2008 2007
Net income (loss) $ (14,617 ) $ 7,636 $ 18,920
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Securities for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment has
        been recorded in earnings:

Unrealized holding losses arising during the period (1,142 ) - -
Loss recognized in earnings 310 - -
Net unrealized (losses) on securities with other-than-temporary
       impairment before tax benefit
(832 ) - -
Tax benefit 316 - -
Net unrealized (losses) on securities with other-than-temporary
        impairment, net of tax in other comprehensive income (loss)
(516 ) - -
Other securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period 2,098 (9,907 ) 1,787
Realized net (gains) recognized into net income (loss) (1,884 ) (73 ) (5 )
Realized impairment losses reclassified into net income 2,302 4,739 -
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other securities before tax (expense) benefit 2,516 (5,241 ) 1,782
Tax (expense) benefit (956 ) 1,989 (675 )
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other securities, net of tax in other
        comprehensive income (loss)
1,560 (3,252 ) 1,107
Other comprehensive income (loss) $ (13,573 ) $ 4,384 $ 20,027

~~See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
Additional Accumulated Other
Preferred Common Paid-in Retained Comprehensive
(in thousands, except per share data) Stock Stock Capital Earnings Income (Loss) Total
Balance, December 31, 2006 $ - $ 3,000 $ 32,000 $ 80,397 $ (1,585 ) $ 113,812
Net income - - - 18,920 - 18,920
Other comprehensive income, unrealized gains on
     securities, net of reclassification adjustment, net of tax
- - - - 1,107 1,107
Shares reacquired and retired under the common stock
     repurchase plan
- - - (974 ) - (974 )
Cash dividends declared, $0.64 per common share - - - (11,224 ) - (11,224 )
Other - - - (35 ) - (35 )
Balance, December 31, 2007 - 3,000 32,000 87,084 (478 ) 121,606
Net income - - - 7,636 - 7,636
Other comprehensive (loss), unrealized (losses) on
     securities, net of reclassification adjustment, net of tax
- - - - (3,252 ) (3,252 )
Preferred shares and common stock warrant issued 33,548 - 2,452 - - 36,000
Shares reacquired and retired under the common stock
     repurchase plan
- - - (789 ) - (789 )
Cash dividends declared, $0.64 per common share - - - (11,138 ) - (11,138 )
Balance, December 31, 2008 33,548 3,000 34,452 82,793 (3,730 ) 150,063
Cumulative effect accounting adjustment, net of tax (1) - - - 1,625 (1,625 ) -
Net (loss) - - - (14,617 ) - (14,617 )
Other comprehensive income, unrealized gains on
     securities, net of reclassification adjustment, net of tax
- - - - 1,044 1,044
Preferred stock discount accretion 476 - - (476 ) - -
Preferred stock issuance costs - - (65 ) - - (65 )
Cash dividends declared, $0.09 per common share - - - (1,566 ) - (1,566 )
Preferred stock dividends declared - - - (1,800 ) - (1,800 )
Balance, December 31, 2009 $ 34,024 $ 3,000 $ 34,387 $ 65,959 $ (4,311 ) $ 133,059

(1) Represents reclassifications of noncredit-related components of previously recorded other-than-temporary impairment losses pursuant to the adoption of accounting guidance on recognition and presentation.

~~See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

(in thousands) 2009 2008 2007
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income (loss) $ (14,617 ) $ 7,636 $ 18,920
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses 24,500 16,600 2,350
Goodwill impairment of banking operations 13,376 - -
Goodwill impairment of discontinued operations 11,160 - -
Net amortization and accretion 798 526 811
Loss on disposition of premises and equipment 7 22 11
Securities gains, net (1,884 ) (73 ) (5 )
Investment securities impairment losses 2,612 4,739 -
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale 71,234 34,368 13,654
Originations of loans held for sale (70,548 ) (33,528 ) (15,377 )
Gain from bank-owned life insurance (840 ) - -
Increase in value of bank-owned life insurance (776 ) (936 ) (890 )
Depreciation 688 686 663
Deferred income taxes (7,261 ) (3,140 ) 148
Other (1,594 ) (325 ) (568 )
Change in assets and liabilities:
Decrease in accrued interest receivable 913 1,414 758
(Increase) decrease in other assets (8,893 ) 3,732 (4,524 )
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities (2,142 ) (4,729 ) 3,951
Net cash provided by operating activities - continuing operations 16,733 26,992 19,902
Net cash provided by operating activities - discontinued operations 905 1,045 515
Net cash provided by operating activities 17,638 28,037 20,417
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Proceeds from sales, calls, and maturities of securities available for sale 191,468 117,129 40,899
Purchases of securities available for sale (350,186 ) (77,268 ) (14,388 )
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank stock (2,617 ) (5,628 ) (5,429 )
Proceeds from redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock - 3,405 4,325
Net change in loans 35,022 (135,396 ) (81,342 )
Net proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned 5,056 3,866 2,204
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment 2 10 -
Purchases of premises and equipment (1,348 ) (547 ) (890 )
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance - - (495 )
Proceeds of principal and earnings from bank-owned life insurance 1,493 - -
Net cash (used in) investing activities - continuing operations (121,110 ) (94,429 ) (55,116 )
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities - discontinued operations (20 ) (170 ) 150
Net cash (used in) investing activities (121,130 ) (94,599 ) (54,966 )

~~(Continued on next page)~~

West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

(in thousands) 2009 2008 2007
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net change in deposits 91,485 243,761 (14,880 )
Net change in federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
(52,769 ) (73,819 ) 57,584
Net change in other short-term borrowings 2,308 (2,427 ) 743
Proceeds from long-term borrowings - 75,000 30,000
Principal payments on long-term borrowings - (53,000 ) (11,900 )
Proceeds from preferred shares and common stock warrant issued - 36,000 -
Payment for shares reacquired under common stock repurchase plan - (789 ) (974 )
Common stock cash dividends (1,566 ) (11,138 ) (11,224 )
Preferred stock dividends paid (1,575 ) - -
Preferred stock issuance costs and other (65 ) - (35 )
Net cash provided by financing activities - continuing operations 37,818 213,588 49,314
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities - discontinued operations 200 - (500 )
Net cash provided by financing activities 38,018 213,588 48,814
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (65,474 ) 147,026 14,265
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Beginning 196,969 49,943 35,678
Ending $ 131,495 $ 196,969 $ 49,943

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash payments for:
Interest $ 28,879 $ 31,934 $ 43,596
Income taxes 2,276 4,080 8,464

Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned $ 26,188 $ 8,132 $ 354
Sale of WB Capital Management Inc. in exchange for a note receivable 2,000 - -

~~See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Note~~ 1.

~~Organization and Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies~~

~~Organization and nature of business~~: West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) operates in the commercial banking industry through its wholly-owned subsidiary, West Bank. West Bank is state chartered and has its main office in West Des Moines, Iowa, with eight branches located in the Des Moines metropolitan area, two branches located in Iowa City, Iowa, and one branch located in Coralville, Iowa. In addition, the Company owns a nonconsolidated subsidiary, West Bancorporation Capital Trust I (the Trust), which was formed in 2003 for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. On December 31, 2009, West Bancorporation, Inc. sold WB Capital Management Inc. (WB Capital), a wholly-owned investment advisory subsi diary.

~~Significant accounting policies~~:

~~Accounting estimates and assumptions~~: The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). References to GAAP issued by the FASB in these footnotes are to the FASB ~~Accounting Standards Codification™~~, sometimes referred to as the Codification or ASC. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses for the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term are the fair value of financial instruments and other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI), allowance for loan losses, and valuation of other real estate owned.

~~Consolidation policy~~: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of West Bancorporation, Inc. (the Holding Company), West Bank, West Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, WB Funding Corporation (which owns an interest in a partnership), and West Bank’s 99.9 percent owned subsidiary, ICD IV, LLC (a community development partnership). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The accounts of WB Capital are included as discontinued operations for all periods through the December 31, 2009, sale date. See Note 2 for additional details. In accordance with GAAP, the results of the Trust are recorded on the books of the Company using the equity method of accounting and are not consolidated.

~~Comprehensive income (loss)~~: Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the net change in unrealized gains and losses on the Company’s securities available for sale, including the noncredit-related portion of unrealized losses of OTTI securities.

~~Cash and cash equivalents~~: For statement of cash flow purposes, the Company considers cash, due from banks, federal funds sold, and short-term investments, to be cash and cash equivalents. Cash flows from loans and deposits are reported net.

~~Securities~~: Securities available for sale are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of deferred income taxes. Available for sale securities may be sold for general liquidity needs, response to market interest rate fluctuations, implementation of asset-liability management strategies, funding loan demand, changes in securities prepayment risk, or other similar factors. Realized gains and losses on sales are computed on a specific identification basis based on amortized cost.

The amortized cost of debt securities classified as available for sale is adjusted for accretion of discounts to maturity and amortization of premiums over the estimated average life of each security or, in the case of callable securities, through the first call date, using the effective yield method. Such amortization and accretion is included in interest income. Interest income on securities is recognized using the interest method according to the terms of the security.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

The Company evaluates its debt securities for OTTI on an ongoing basis for those securities with a fair value below amortized cost. The review takes into consideration current market conditions, issuer rating changes and trends, the credit worthiness of the obligator of the security, current analysts’ evaluations, failure of the issuer to make scheduled interest or principal payments, the Company’s lack of intent to sell the security or whether it is more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery, as well as other qualitative factors. The term OTTI is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value is not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment. Any portion of such a decline in value associated with credit loss is recognized in earnings as an impairment loss with the remaining noncredit-related component being recognized in other comprehensive income. A credit loss is determined by assessing whether the amortized cost basis of the security will be recovered, by comparing the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security, computed using original yield as the discount rate, to the amortized cost basis of the security. The shortfall of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected in relation to the amortized cost basis is considered to be the “credit loss.”

~~Loans held for sale~~: Loans held for sale include residential mortgages that were originated in accordance with secondary market pricing and underwriting standards and are stated at the lower of cost or market value determined on an aggregate basis. Gains and losses on loan sales are recorded in noninterest income.

~~Loans~~: Loans are stated at the principal amounts outstanding, net of unamortized loan fees and costs, with interest income recognized on the interest method based upon those outstanding loan balances. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest method.

The accrual of interest on past due and other impaired loans is generally discontinued at 90 days or when, in the opinion of management, the borrower may be unable to make payments as they become due. Unless considered collectible, all interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual or charged off is reversed against interest income, if accrued in the current year, or charged to the allowance for loan losses, if accrued in the prior year. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received. Loans are returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. A loan is classified as restructured when the interest rate is materially reduced o r the term is extended beyond the original maturity date because of the inability of the borrower to service the loan at market terms. These loans are accounted for as impaired until performance is established.

A loan is impaired when it is probable that West Bank will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest payments due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The amount of impairment, if any, and any subsequent changes are included in the allowance for loan losses.

~~Allowance for loan losses~~: The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that collectability of the principal is unlikely. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans, based on an evaluation of the collectability of loans and prior loss experience. This evaluation also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, the review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay. Whil e management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions or the other factors relied upon.

The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that meet the definition of impaired. The general component covers the remaining loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors such as delinquency trends, loan growth, economic elements and local market conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review West Bank’s allowance for loan losses, and may require West Bank to make additions to the allowance based on their judgment about information available to them at the time of their examinations.

~~Premises and equipment~~: Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. The straight-line method of depreciation and amortization is used for calculating expense. The estimated useful lives of premises and equipment range up to 40 years for buildings, up to 10 years for furniture and equipment, and the shorter of the estimated useful life or lease term for leasehold improvements.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Other real estate owned~~: Real estate properties acquired through or in lieu of foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling cost at the date of foreclosure. Fair value is determined by management by obtaining appraisals or other market value information. Any write-downs in value at the date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan losses. After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and subsequent write-downs are recorded as a charge to operations, if necessary, to reduce the carrying value of a property to the updated fair value less estimated selling cost.

~~Trust assets: Assets held by West Bank in fiduciary or agency capacities, other than trust cash on deposit at West Bank, are not included in the consolidated financial statements.~~

~~Goodwill~~: Goodwill is the excess of the cash paid over the net fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in an acquisition, less the amount of identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is deemed to have an indefinite life, is not subject to amortization, and is instead tested for impairment at least annually or on an interim basis if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount.

Impairment is reviewed using a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, no impairment exists, and the second step is not performed. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, the second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Goodwill impairment was reviewed as of June 30, 2009, because the Company’s stock traded at a market price of less than its per share book value. Based on the analysis performed at that date, an impairment of $13,376, representing all of West Bank’s goodwill was recorded for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. &# 160;See additional details of goodwill impairment in Notes 2 and 6.

~~Bank-owned life insurance~~: The carrying amount of bank-owned life insurance consists of the initial premium paid plus increases in cash value less the carrying amount associated with any death benefit received. Death benefits paid in excess of the applicable carrying amount are recognized as income, which is exempt from income taxes.

~~Transfer of financial assets~~: Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when the assets have been isolated from the Company, the transferee obtains the right, free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right, to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

~~Preferred stock and common stock warrant~~: The proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock and a common stock warrant were allocated between the two based upon the proportionate fair value of each at the time of receipt. The resulting discount on preferred stock is being accreted to par using an effective yield method over a five-year period. The accretion results in an adjustment directly to retained earnings and decreases the income available to common shareholders.

~~Income taxes (benefits)~~: The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return. Income tax expense (benefit) is generally allocated as if the Holding Company and its subsidiaries file separate income tax returns. Deferred taxes are provided on an asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the consolidated financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. The evaluation of a tax position taken is considered by itself and is not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. Management does not believe the Company has any material uncertain tax positions which need to be disclosed.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Interest and penalties related to income taxes are recorded as other noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.~~

~~Current accounting developments~~: In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance on recognition and presentation of OTTI, which is included in the Codification as part of FASB ASC 320-10-35. This guidance requires entities to separate an OTTI of a debt security into two components when there are credit-related losses associated with the impaired debt security for which management asserts that it does not have the intent to sell the security, and it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. The amount of the OTTI related to a credit loss is recognized in earnings, and the amount of the OTTI related to other factors is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). The Co mpany adopted this guidance effective for the quarter ending June 30, 2009. The Company recorded a cumulative effect accounting adjustment that increased retained earnings and decreased accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by $2,622 pre-tax or $1,625 after tax, relating to the $4,739 of impairment losses recorded during 2008.

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance on determining fair value when volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased and identifying transactions that are not orderly, which is included in the Codification as part of FASB ASC 820-10-35. Under this guidance, if an entity determines that there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or the liability in relation to the normal market activity for the asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that the transaction for the asset or liability is not orderly, the entity shall place little, if any, weight on that transaction price as an indicator of fair value. Th e Company adopted this guidance effective for the quarter ending June 30, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance on interim disclosures about fair value of financial instruments, which is included in the Codification as part of FASB ASC 270-10-05. This guidance requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim and annual financial statements. The Company adopted this guidance effective for the quarter ending June 30, 2009. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855, which established standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This guidance requires entities to disclose the date through which they have evaluated subsequent events and whether the date corresponds to the release of their financial statements. The Company has adopted this pronouncement and events have been evaluated through the date financial statements are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets to improve the reporting for the transfer of financial assets resulting from (1) practices that have developed since the issuance of the prior standard that are not consistent with the original intent and key requirements of the prior standard, and (2) concerns of financial statement users that many of the financial assets (and related obligations) that have been derecognized should continue to be reported in the financial statements of transferors. This guidance is included in the Codification as ASC 860. This guidance must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application was prohibited. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. This guidance is included in the Codification as part of ASC 810. The guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application was prohibited. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

In August 2009, the FASB issued guidance on measuring liabilities at fair value, which is included in ASC 820-10. The update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques:

1.	~~A valuation technique that uses (a) the quoted price of an identical liability when traded as an asset, or (b) quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets.~~

Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of Topic 820. Examples include an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability.

This guidance was effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after August 2009. The Company adopted this standard effective for the quarter ending September 30, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s disclosures.

~~Earnings (loss) per common share~~: Basic earnings (loss) per common share from continuing and discontinued operations are computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Income (loss) available to common stockholders is net income (loss) less preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount on preferred stock, treated as preferred stock dividends. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share from continuing and discontinued operations reflect the potential dilution that could occur if the Company’s outstanding stock warrant was exercised and converted into common stock. The dilutive effect is computed using the treasury stock met hod, which assumes all outstanding warrants are exercised. The incremental shares, to the extent they would have been dilutive, are included in the denominator of the diluted earnings (loss) per common share calculation.

~~Reclassifications~~: Certain items in the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were reclassified to be consistent with the classifications used in the December 31, 2009 financial statements. The reclassifications consisted primarily of reclassifying the accounts of WB Capital as discontinued operations as a result of the sale of the subsidiary effective December 31, 2009. The reclassifications had no effect on net income (loss) or stockholders’ equity.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Note 2.~~

~~Discontinued Operations~~

After receiving solicitations from third parties to purchase WB Capital, the Company’s Board of Director’s decided to exit this business line and focus on community banking. On October 1, 2009, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of its stock ownership interest in WB Capital. The sale closed on December 31, 2009. The consideration received was a $2,000 seven-year promissory note and contingent earn-out payments of up to $1,170 over a five-year period if WB Capital achieves certain revenue milestones. The contingent payments have not been recorded as they are not considered likely to occur. The assets and liabilities of WB Capital have been classified as discontinued operations held for sale for periods prior to the sale date. The resul ts of operations and cash flows of WB Capital have been reflected on those statements as discontinued operations for both the current and prior year periods reported. Assets and liabilities of discontinued operations consist of the following as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:

2009 2008
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale:
Cash and due from banks $ - $ 345
Securities available for sale - 50
Premises and equipment, net - 277
Goodwill - 11,554
Other intangible assets - 927
Other assets - 822
Total assets of discontinued operations held for sale $ - $ 13,975
Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale:
Accrued expenses and other liabilities - 1,323
Total liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale $ - $ 1,323

~~The results of discontinued operations consist of the following for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007:~~

2009 2008 2007
Revenue from discontinued operations:
Interest income $ - $ - $ -
Interest expense - 1 -
Net interest income - (1 ) -
Noninterest income 6,184 7,596 8,137
Noninterest expense 16,446 7,032 7,155
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes (10,262 ) 563 982
Income taxes (benefits) (696 ) 238 414
Income (loss) from discontinued operations $ (9,566 ) $ 325 $ 568

Noninterest expense for 2009 included goodwill impairment of $11,160 and loss on sale of $127. WB Capital was the only activity in the Company’s previously reported investment advisory segment disclosures. The remainder of the Company was reported in the banking segment. Therefore, the Company is no longer disclosing segment information.

The definitive agreement includes a provision that the Company will not be involved in the investment advisory business for five years after closing, except as currently performed by the West Bank trust department. The new owner of WB Capital will be allowed to make its investment advisory services available at standard rates to West Bank’s trust department customers and is managing West Bank’s bond portfolio for a three-year period. The annual continuing cash flows to the buyer are not expected to be significant.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Note 3.~~

~~Securities~~

For securities available for sale, the following table shows the amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses (pre-tax) included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), and estimated fair value by security type as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. Included in gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2009, is an OTTI loss of $3,455 relating to a pooled trust preferred security, which represents the noncredit-related portion of the overall impairment.

2009
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains (Losses) Value
U.S. government agencies and corporations $ 177,940 $ 190 $ (240 ) $ 177,890
State and political subdivisions 88,831 823 (1,719 ) 87,935
Mortgage-backed securities (1) 64,897 141 (460 ) 64,578
Trust preferred securities (2) 6,926 - (4,859 ) 2,067
Corporate notes and other investments 8,839 28 (859 ) 8,008
$ 347,433 $ 1,182 $ (8,137 ) $ 340,478

2008
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains (Losses) Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies and corporations $ 58,895 $ 2,155 $ - $ 61,050
State and political subdivisions 109,682 1,271 (3,778 ) 107,175
Mortgage-backed securities 1,234 - - 1,234
Trust preferred securities (3) 8,025 - (2,756 ) 5,269
Corporate notes and other investments 9,564 3 (2,911 ) 6,656
$ 187,400 $ 3,429 $ (9,445 ) $ 181,384

~~(1)~~

All mortgage-backed securities consist of residential mortgage pass-through securities guaranteed by GNMA or are issued by FNMA, and real estate mortgage investment conduits guaranteed by FHLMC or GNMA.

~~(2)~~

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment that increased retained earnings and decreased other comprehensive income (loss) by $2,622, or $1,625 net of tax, respectively. This was done in accordance with a new GAAP requirement which states that previously recorded impairment charges which did not relate to credit losses should be reclassified from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

~~(3)~~

The Company recorded OTTI charges in this category of $2,622 for the year ended December 31, 2008 related to one pooled trust preferred security. For the security deemed impaired, the amortized cost was written down to the fair value of the security.

Securities with an amortized cost of approximately $170,211 and $161,765 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were pledged as collateral on the Treasury, Tax, and Loan Option Notes, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and for other purposes as required or permitted by law or regulation. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are held in safekeeping on behalf of the Company.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale as of December 31, 2009, by contractual maturity are shown on the following page. Certain securities have call features which allow the issuer to call the securities prior to maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities in mortgage-backed securities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Therefore, mortgage-backed securities are not included in the maturity categories in the following maturity summary.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

December 31, 2009
Amortized Fair
Cost Value
Due in one year or less $ 22,353 $ 22,417
Due after one year through five years 168,713 167,873
Due after five years through ten years 40,586 40,344
Due after ten years 50,884 45,266
282,536 275,900
Mortgage-backed securities 64,897 64,578
$ 347,433 $ 340,478

Realized gains and losses on sales of securities available for sale are computed on a specific identification basis and are based on amortized cost. The details of the sales of securities are summarized in the following table:

2009 2008 2007
Proceeds from sales $ 155,064 $ 9,854 $ 9,983
Gross gains on sales 2,726 73 21
Gross losses on sales 842 - 16

The following tables show the fair value and gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. The table includes one trust preferred security for which a portion of an OTTI has been recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).

2009
Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total
Gross Gross Gross
Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized
Value (Losses) Value (Losses) Value (Losses)
U.S. government agencies and corporations $ 42,535 $ (240 ) $ - $ - $ 42,535 $ (240 )
State and political subdivisions 31,433 (1,159 ) 11,652 (560 ) 43,085 (1,719 )
Mortgage-backed securities 47,644 (460 ) - - 47,644 (460 )
Trust preferred securities - - 2,067 (4,859 ) 2,067 (4,859 )
Corporate notes and other investments - - 3,128 (859 ) 3,128 (859 )
$ 121,612 $ (1,859 ) $ 16,847 $ (6,278 ) $ 138,459 $ (8,137 )

2008
Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total
Gross Gross Gross
Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized
Value (Losses) Value (Losses) Value (Losses)
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
and corporations
$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
State and political subdivisions 41,901 (3,109 ) 5,937 (669 ) 47,838 (3,778 )
Mortgage-backed securities - - - - - -
Trust preferred securities 2,401 (1,799 ) 292 (957 ) 2,693 (2,756 )
Corporate notes and other investments 1,512 (488 ) 1,560 (2,423 ) 3,072 (2,911 )
$ 45,814 $ (5,396 ) $ 7,789 $ (4,049 ) $ 53,603 $ (9,445 )

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

As of December 31, 2009, the available for sale investment portfolio included 29 municipal securities, 3 trust preferred securities, and 1 corporate note with current unrealized losses that have existed for longer than one year.

The Company’s unrealized losses on investments in U.S government agencies and corporations are due to market conditions, not in decreased estimated cash flows. The Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and does not anticipate that these securities will be required to be sold before anticipated recovery, and expects full principal and interest to be collected. Therefore, the Company does not consider these investments to be OTTI at December 31, 2009.

The majority of the municipal obligations are with Iowa communities considered to be acceptable credit risks. The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in state and political subdivisions are due to market conditions, not in decreased estimated cash flows. The Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and does not anticipate that these securities will be required to be sold before anticipated recovery, and expects full principal and interest to be collected. Therefore, the Company does not consider these investments to be OTTI at December 31, 2009.

The unrealized losses in two single-issuer trust preferred securities are due to reduced demand for these securities along with interest rate fluctuations and illiquid markets, not estimated cash flows. The Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and does not anticipate that these securities will be required to be sold before anticipated recovery, and expects full principal and interest will be collected. Therefore, the Company does not consider these investments to be OTTI at December 31, 2009.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded OTTI on a pooled trust preferred security, which resulted in a reduction of noninterest income of $2,622. Pursuant to a new accounting pronouncement in 2009, which states that previously recorded impairment charges which did not relate to a credit loss should be reclassified from retained earnings to other comprehensive income, the Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment that increased retained earnings and decreased other comprehensive income (loss) by $2,622, or $1,625, net of tax. None of the previously recorded impairment loss was considered a credit loss as of the date of adoption of this accounting pronouncement.

The Company recognized OTTI of $2,267 for the year ended December 31, 2009, on five single-issuer trust preferred securities. The carrying value of these securities were written down to the then current market value on the dates management determined they were OTTI. Subsequent to the impairment dates, four of the securities were sold and net losses of $68 were realized. The fifth trust preferred security has no carrying value and no recovery is expected.

The Company’s unrealized loss on investments in corporate bonds is due to market conditions, not in estimated cash flows. The Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and does not anticipate that these securities will be required to be sold before anticipated recovery, and expects full principal and interest to be collected. Therefore, the Company does not consider these investments to be OTTI at December 31, 2009.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

The following table provides a roll forward of the amount of credit-related losses recognized in earnings for the pooled trust preferred security for which a portion of OTTI has been recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2009:

2009
Balance at beginning of period $ -
Current period credit loss recognized in earnings 310
Reductions for securities sold during the period -
Reductions for securities where there is an intent to sell or requirement to sell -
Reductions for increases in cash flows expected to be collected -
Balance as of December 31, 2009 $ 310

~~The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), presented net of taxes, as of December 31, 2009, are shown in the following table:~~

December 31, 2009
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss):
Unrealized (losses) on available for sale securities for which a portion of
other-than-temporary impairment has been recorded in earnings, net of tax of $1,313
$ (2,142 )
Unrealized (losses) on available for sale securities which are not
other-than-temporarily impaired, net of tax of $1,330
(2,169 )
$ (4,311 )

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Note 4.~~

~~Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses~~

~~Loans consist of the following as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:~~

2009 2008
Commercial $ 356,885 $ 391,926
Real estate:
Construction, land and land development 148,505 152,704
1-4 family residential 94,398 103,134
Commercial 413,063 441,444
Consumer and other loans 8,163 11,884
1,021,014 1,101,092
Net unamortized fees and costs 304 357
$ 1,020,710 $ 1,100,735

~~The loan portfolio includes approximately $560,729 and $589,469 of fixed rate loans and $460,285 and $511,623 of variable rate loans as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.~~

Real estate loans of approximately $261,000 and $240,000 were pledged as security for Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Loans of approximately $31 and $117 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were pledged as collateral on the Treasury, Tax and Loan Option Notes.

~~Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007:~~

2009 2008 2007
Balance, at beginning of year $ 15,441 $ 8,935 $ 8,494
Provision for loan losses 24,500 16,600 2,350
Recoveries 565 276 233
Charge-offs (21,380 ) (10,370 ) (2,142 )
Balance, at end of year $ 19,126 $ 15,441 $ 8,935

A loan is impaired when it is probable that West Bank will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest payments due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The amount of the impairment is included in the allowance for loan losses. The following is a recap of impaired loans at December 31, 2009 and 2008:

2009 2008
Impaired loans without an allowance $ 16,809 $ 18,067
Impaired loans with an allowance 24,745 23,044
Total impaired loans $ 41,554 $ 41,111
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans $ 4,935 $ 3,590

~~The following table reconciles the balance of nonaccrual loans with impaired loans carried at fair value as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:~~

2009 2008
Nonaccrual loans $ 12,350 $ 21,367
Restructured loans 12,817 7,376
Other impaired loans still accruing interest 16,387 12,368
Total impaired loans $ 41,554 $ 41,111

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

The balance of impaired loans at December 31, 2009, was comprised of 47 different borrowers and the balance of impaired loans at December 31, 2008, was comprised of 40 different borrowers. West Bank has no commitments to advance additional funds on any of the restructured loans.

The average recorded investments in impaired loans during 2009, 2008, and 2007 totaled approximately $50,919, $13,664, and $1,023, respectively. Interest income forgone on impaired loans was approximately $1,411 during 2009, $795 during 2008, and $70 during 2007. Interest income recognized on impaired loans in 2009 was approximately $1,808 and was an immaterial amount in 2008 and 2007. Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest totaled $1,150 and $92 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The Company has had, and may be expected to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of business with directors, executive officers, their immediate families, affiliated companies in which they are principal stockholders, and five percent stockholders (commonly referred to as related parties), all of which have been, in the opinion of management, on the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated parties.

~~Loan transactions with related parties were as follows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:~~

2009 2008
Balance, beginning of year $ 22,446 $ 14,586
New loans 31,921 13,563
Repayments (29,958 ) (6,036 )
Change in classification (182 ) 333
Balance, end of year $ 24,227 $ 22,446

~~Note 5.~~

~~Premises and Equipment, Net~~

~~Premises and equipment consisted of the following as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:~~

2009 2008
Land $ 1,251 $ 1,251
Buildings 868 787
Leasehold improvements 2,754 1,928
Furniture and equipment 4,857 4,619
9,730 8,585
Accumulated depreciation 4,440 3,946
$ 5,290 $ 4,639

~~Note 6.~~

~~Goodwill~~

Goodwill impairment was reviewed as of June 30, 2009, because the Company’s stock traded at a market price of less than its per share book value. With the assistance of a third party valuation firm, management prepared an estimate of the fair value of a 100 percent controlling marketable interest in the outstanding stock of West Bank. A combination of the income and market approaches was used in determining the fair value. Under the income approach, the primary factor considered was the ability of West Bank to generate future cash flows. A discount rate was estimated by utilizing the build-up method which factors in the following components: a risk-free rate of return, an equity risk premium, an industry risk premium or discount, a size premium and risk associated specifically with West Bank. A discount rate of 12.04 percent was then applied to projected future cash flows. Under the market approach, stock market data regularly published on publicly traded companies considered to be similar to West Bank were utilized in determining market value. The two indicated values were then weighted to represent the relative importance a market participant might reasonably be expected to place on the results of each method. Based on the above analysis, an impairment of $13,376, or all of West Bank’s goodwill was recognized in the second quarter of 2009.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Note 7.~~

~~Deposits~~

~~At December 31, 2009, the scheduled maturities of time deposits were as follows:~~

2010 $ 383,890
2011 20,935
2012 16,823
2013 12,115
2014 and thereafter 2,000
$ 435,763

Time deposits included $256,376 of Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) deposits, which is a program that coordinates, on a reciprocal basis, a network of banks to spread deposits exceeding the FDIC insurance coverage limits out to numerous institutions in order to provide insurance coverage for all participating deposits. Total CDARS deposits included $13,601 of wholesale deposits which are used by the Company as an alternative source of funds. Wholesale deposits come through intermediaries acting on behalf of the ultimate depositor.

~~Savings deposits included $187,358 of SmartyPig~~® savings, which is an internet-based savings and rewards program developed by SmartyPig, LLC, which is partially owned by WB Funding, a subsidiary of West Bank. Due to its successful growth, SmartyPig® ~~is outgrowing West Bank. Based on projected trends, the volume of SmartyPig~~® ~~deposits will become disproportionate to the size of West Bank. It is expected that the SmartyPig~~® ~~deposits will transfer to a larger bank during 2010. West Bank has appropriate liquidity to facilitate such a transfer.~~

~~Note 8.~~

~~Other Short-Term Borrowings~~

Short-term borrowings as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 consisted of Treasury, Tax and Loan Option Notes. The Treasury, Tax and Loan Option Notes are collateralized by certain loans and investment securities.

~~Note 9.~~

~~Subordinated Notes~~

On July 18, 2003, the Company obtained $20,619 in trust preferred securities from its participation in the issuance of a pooled trust preferred security. The security has a 30-year maturity, does not require any principal amortization, and is callable in 2010 at par at the issuer’s option. The interest rate is fixed until July 18, 2010, at 6.975% and then becomes variable based on the three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.05%. Interest is payable quarterly. The effective cost of this security through July 18, 2010, including amortization of the discount fee, is 7.14%. Holders of the subordinated notes have no voting rights, are unsecured, and rank junior in priority to all of the Company’s indebtedness and senior to the Company’s common and preferred stock. See Note 1 for a discussion of the accounting principles related to this debt.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Note 10.~~

~~Federal Home Loan Bank Advances and Other Borrowings~~

~~The following table presents the balance of other borrowings at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related rates:~~

2009 2008
Federal Home Loan Bank advances; interest due
monthly with rates ranging from 2.70% to 5.96%
$ 125,000 $ 125,000

The FHLB advances are collateralized by FHLB stock and real estate loans, as required by the FHLB’s collateral policy. Advances totaling $70,000 are callable on a quarterly basis. An advance of $30,000 with a maturity date of 2017 is first callable in 2010, and is callable on a quarterly basis thereafter. An advance of $25,000 with a maturity date of 2018 is first callable in 2011, and is callable on a quarterly basis thereafter.

~~The aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations (based on final maturity dates) as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:~~

2010 $ 20,000
2015 and thereafter 105,000
Total $ 125,000

At December 31, 2009, West Bank had arrangements to borrow approximately $63,000 in unsecured federal funds lines of credit at correspondent banks which are available under the correspondent bank’s normal terms. The lines have no stated expiration date. As of December 31, 2009, no balance was outstanding under these arrangements. West Bank also has additional borrowing capacity of approximately $45,000 at the FHLB as of December 31, 2009.

~~Note 11.~~

~~Income Taxes from Continuing Operations~~

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state jurisdictions. Income tax returns for the years 2006 through 2009 remain open to examination by Federal and State taxing authorities. A federal examination for 2007 was completed with no adjustment to reported taxable income.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in other noninterest expense. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Company recognized no material interest or penalties. No accrued interest or penalties are included in accrued tax expenses in the balance sheet at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

~~The components of income tax expense (benefit) related to continuing operations consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007:~~

2009 2008 2007
Current:
Federal $ (1,523 ) $ 3,699 $ 6,890
State 430 827 1,024
Deferred:
Federal (5,544 ) (3,047 ) 174
State (719 ) (93 ) (26 )
$ (7,356 ) $ 1,386 $ 8,062

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Total income tax expense (benefit) differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to income (loss) before income taxes as a result of the following:~~

Years Ended December 31,
2009 2008 2007
Amount
Percent
of Pretax
Income
Amount
Percent
of Pretax
Income
Amount
Percent
of Pretax
Income

Computed expected tax expense (benefit) $ (4,342 ) -35.0 % $ 3,044 35.0 % $ 9,245 35.0 %
State income tax expense (benefit), net of
     federal income tax benefit
(440 ) -3.5 % 444 5.1 % 640 2.4 %
Tax-exempt interest income (1,971 ) -15.9 % (1,700 ) -19.6 % (1,525 ) -5.8 %
Nondeductible interest expense
     to own tax-exempts
148 1.2 % 187 2.2 % 265 1.0 %
Tax-exempt increase in cash
     value of life insurance and proceeds
(565 ) -4.6 % (327 ) -3.8 % (311 ) -1.2 %
Capital loss carryover due to
     sale of WB Capital
(3,296 ) -26.6 % - 0.0 % - 0.0 %
Valuation allowance 3,320 26.8 % 389 4.5 % - 0.0 %
New market tax credit (228 ) -1.8 % (228 ) -2.6 % (228 ) -0.8 %
Other, net 18 0.1 % (423 ) -4.9 % (24 ) -0.1 %
$ (7,356 ) -59.3 % $ 1,386 15.9 % $ 8,062 30.5 %

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to net deferred tax assets consist of the following as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:~~

2009 2008
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses $ 7,268 $ 5,868
Net unrealized losses on securities available for sale 2,643 2,286
Investment security impairment - 997
Equity security impairment 144 130
Intangibles 2,517 -
Alternative minimum tax credit and other credits 909 -
State net operating loss carryforward 296 259
Capital loss carryforward 3,269 -
Other 793 520
17,839 10,060
Deferred tax liabilities:
Net deferred loan fees and costs 324 358
Intangibles - 2,331
Premises and equipment 462 349
Loans 399 266
Other 122 164
1,307 3,468
Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance 16,532 6,592
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets (3,709 ) (389 )
Net deferred tax assets $ 12,823 $ 6,203

The Company has approximately $4,931 of state operating loss carryforwards available to the Holding Company to offset future state taxable income. The Company has approximately $7,956 of federal capital loss carryforwards and $7,992 of state capital loss carryforwards available to offset future capital gains. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against the tax effect of the state net operating loss, federal and state capital loss carryforwards, and equity security impairment as management believes it is more likely than not that such carryforwards will expire without being utilized. The state operating loss carryforwards expire in 2020 and thereafter and the capital loss carryforwards expire in 2013 and 2014.

~~Note 12.~~

~~Regulatory Capital Requirements~~

The Company and West Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by Federal and State banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators which, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and West Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and West Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and West Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier I capital to average assets. Management believes the Company and West Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject as of December 31, 2009. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to the Holding Company.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

As of December 31, 2009, the most recent notification from regulatory agencies categorized West Bank as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed West Bank’s category.

~~The Company’s and West Bank’s capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table:~~

To Be Well-
Capitalized Under
For Capital Prompt Corrective
Actual Adequacy Purposes Action Provisions
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
As of December 31, 2009:
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Consolidated $ 172,217 14.3 % $ 96,441 8.0 % n/a n/a
West Bank 166,795 13.9 95,991 8.0 $ 119,989 10.0 %

Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Consolidated 157,098 13.0 48,220 4.0 n/a n/a
West Bank 141,745 11.8 47,995 4.0 71,993 6.0

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
Consolidated 157,098 9.8 64,180 4.0 n/a n/a
West Bank 141,745 8.9 64,013 4.0 80,016 5.0

As of December 31, 2008:
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Consolidated $ 165,458 13.3 % $ 99,383 8.0 % n/a n/a
West Bank 161,790 13.1 99,073 8.0 $ 123,841 10.0 %

Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Consolidated 150,017 12.1 49,692 4.0 n/a n/a
West Bank 136,349 11.0 49,536 4.0 74,305 6.0

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
Consolidated 150,017 10.3 58,244 4.0 n/a n/a
West Bank 136,349 9.4 58,066 4.0 72,583 5.0

The goodwill impairment charge discussed earlier had a negligible impact on regulatory capital measurements. Goodwill and other intangible assets are not included in capital or assets when calculating regulatory capital ratios.

The Company’s tangible common equity ratio at December 31, 2009, was 6.27 percent, up from 5.91 percent at December 31, 2008. The tangible common equity ratio is computed by dividing total equity less preferred stock and intangible assets by total assets less preferred stock.

West Bank is restricted as to the amount of dividends that may be paid to the Holding Company without prior regulatory approval. West Bank may not pay dividends that would result in its capital levels being reduced below the minimum requirements. As of December 31, 2009, West Bank had approximately $35,145 of retained earnings available for dividends.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Note 13.~~

~~Stockholders’ Equity and Earnings (Loss) per Common Share~~

~~Preferred stock:~~ ~~On December 23, 2008, the shareholders of the Company approved a proposal to amend the Company’s Restated Articles of Incorporation to authorize a class of 50 million shares of preferred stock.~~

On December 31, 2008, the Company issued 36,000 shares of perpetual cumulative senior preferred stock to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the Treasury) under the Capital Purchase Program (CPP). The preferred stock has a par value of $0.01 per share and a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, or $36,000. Dividends are payable quarterly at the rate of five percent per annum until the fifth anniversary date of the issuance and at a rate of nine percent per annum thereafter. The dividends are computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. The dividends are payable quarterly in arrears on February 15, May 15, August 15, and November 15 of each year.

The senior preferred stock is non-voting, other than class voting rights on any authorization or issuance of shares ranking senior to the senior preferred stock, any amendment to the rights of senior preferred stock, or any merger, exchange, or similar transaction that would adversely affect the rights of the senior preferred stock. If dividends are not paid in full for six dividend periods, whether or not consecutive, the Treasury will have the right to elect two directors to the Company’s Board. The right to elect directors would end when full dividends have been paid for four consecutive dividend periods.

The Company has the option to repay the funds received under the CPP without regard to whether the Company has replaced the funds from other sources or any waiting period, subject to consultation with the Federal Reserve and the FDIC.

The CPP requires that the Company be subject to Treasury standards for executive compensation and corporate governance as long as any obligation arising from financial assistance provided under the statute remains outstanding. The CPP requires that the Treasury’s preferred stock be the senior debt of the Company for any future borrowings. The Congress and Treasury may create additional provisions that could become retroactively applicable to the preferred stock.

~~Common stock:~~ On April 16, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized the buyback of up to $5,000 of the Company’s common stock for a period of 12 months. No shares were purchased during the 2008 authorization. Under the CPP, the Treasury’s consent is required for any share repurchases of common stock until December 31, 2011, unless the senior preferred stock has been redeemed or the Treasury has transferred all of the senior preferred stock to third parties.

Any proposed dividend increase above the $0.16 quarterly dividend paid in the quarter ended September 30, 2008, is subject to the approval of the Treasury until December 31, 2011, unless the senior preferred stock has been redeemed or the Treasury has transferred all of the senior preferred stock to third parties.

On April 12, 2005, shareholders approved the West Bancorporation, Inc. Restricted Stock Compensation Plan. The plan provides awards to be made until March 1, 2015, with a maximum of 300,000 shares purchased in the open market to be issued as awards, subject to certain restrictions. The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors administers the Plan. As of December 31, 2009, no awards had been granted under this plan.

~~Common stock warrants:~~ In connection with the CPP described above, a common stock warrant exercisable for 474,100 shares of common stock was issued and is exercisable on or before December 31, 2018. The warrant entitles the Treasury to purchase 474,100 shares of common stock at $11.39 per share. The difference in the market value of a share of common stock compared to the exercise price of a share of common stock under the warrant was a decline of $6.46 per share as of December 31, 2009. If the Company repays the CPP funds in full, the Treasury would be required to liquidate the warrant at the current market price.

As holder of the common stock warrant, the Treasury is not entitled to vote, to receive dividends, or to exercise any other rights of common shareholders for any purpose until such warrants have been duly exercised. The Treasury has agreed not to exercise voting power with respect to any shares of common stock issued upon exercise. The Company intends to maintain at all times during the period the preferred stock is outstanding and during the period the warrant is exercisable, a “shelf” registration statement relating to the issuance of common shares underlying the warrant for the benefit of the warrant holder.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

The fair value of the warrant was estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The valuation model incorporated assumptions including the Company’s common stock price, dividend yield, stock price volatility, and the risk-free interest rate. The following is a summary of the assumptions used in this model for the warrant issued on December 31, 2008.

Warrant December 31, 2008
Expected volatility 55.00 %
Expected term in years 5
Risk-free interest rate 2.21 %
Dividend yield 5.28 %
Weighted average estimated fair value $ 4.15

The fair value of the preferred stock was determined based on assumptions regarding the discount rate (market rate) on the preferred stock which was estimated to be approximately 12 percent at the date of issuance. The proceeds from Treasury were then allocated based on the relative fair value of the warrants as compared with the fair value of the preferred stock.

~~Earnings (loss) per common share:~~ The calculation of earnings (loss) per common share and diluted earnings (loss) per common share for 2009, 2008, and 2007 is presented below. See Note 1, Organization and Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for a discussion on the calculation of earnings (loss) per common share.

2009 2008 2007
Income (loss) from continuing operations $ (5,051 ) $ 7,311 $ 18,352
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (9,566 ) 325 568
Net income (loss) (14,617 ) 7,636 18,920
Preferred stock dividends* (1,800 ) - -
Preferred stock discount accretion* (476 ) - -
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders $ (16,893 ) $ 7,636 $ 18,920

Weighted average common shares outstanding 17,404 17,405 17,536
Common stock warrant** - - -
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 17,404 17,405 17,536

Basic earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations $ (0.42 ) $ 0.42 $ 1.05
Basic earnings (loss) per common share from discontinued operations $ (0.55 ) $ 0.02 $ 0.03
Basic earnings (loss) per common share $ (0.97 ) $ 0.44 $ 1.08

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations $ (0.42 ) $ 0.42 $ 1.05
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share from discontinued operations $ (0.55 ) $ 0.02 $ 0.03
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share $ (0.97 ) $ 0.44 $ 1.08

*Preferred stock and the common stock warrant were issued on December 31, 2008, and therefore had no effect in 2008 or 2007.

**The average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $6.41. This was less than the $11.39 exercise price of the common stock warrant to purchase 474,100 shares of common stock; therefore, the warrant was not dilutive.

~~Note 14.~~

~~Commitments and Contingencies~~

The Company leases real estate under several noncancelable operating lease agreements. Rent expense related to these leases was approximately $1,712, $1,304, and $1,365, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~The approximate total minimum rental commitments as of December 31, 2009 consisted of the following:~~

2010 $ 1,610
2011 1,311
2012 1,248
2013 1,248
2014 939
Thereafter 10,168
$ 16,524

The total minimum rental commitment for 2010 includes approximately $191 related to office space occupied by former subsidiary WB Capital (now known as Miles Capital, Inc.). This space is being subleased to them at the same rate, with the lease expiring for both parties on October 31, 2010.

~~Required reserve balances~~: West Bank is required to maintain an average reserve balance with the Federal Reserve Bank which is included in cash and due from banks. Required reserve balances were approximately $2,537 and $2,323 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

~~Financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk~~: The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. The Company’s commitments as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 consisted of the following approximate amounts:

2009 2008
Commitments to extend credit $ 202,217 $ 301,214
Standby letters of credit 18,350 19,788
$ 220,567 $ 321,002

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments to extend credit generally expire within one year. Home equity commitments to extend credit of approximately $9,211 at December 31, 2009, expire within 10 years. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained is based on management’s credit evaluation of the party. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment, residential real estate, and commercial properties.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party, and generally expire within one year. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. Collateral held varies as specified above, and is required in instances the Company deems necessary. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third party, West Bank would be required to fund the commitment. The maximum potential amount of future payments West Bank could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount for letters of credit shown in the table above. If the commitment is funded, West Bank would be entitled to seek recovery from the customer. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, no amounts have been recorded as liabilities for West Bank’s potential obligations under these guarantees.

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

In February 2008, West Bank executed a Mortgage Partnership Finance (MPF) Master Commitment (the Commitment) with the FHLB of Des Moines to deliver mortgage loans and to guarantee the payment of any realized losses that exceed the FHLB’s first loss account for mortgages delivered under the Commitment. West Bank receives credit enhancement fees from the FHLB for providing this guarantee and continuing to assist with managing the credit risk of the MPF Program mortgage loans. The term of the Commitment and guarantee per the Master Commitment is through March 18, 2010. (West Bank expects to enter into a new commitment upon the expiration of the current commitment.) At December 31, 2009, any liability represented by the present value of the credit enhancement fees less any expected losses i n the mortgages delivered under the Commitment was immaterial. West Bank has not experienced any losses under these guarantees.

~~Concentrations of credit risk~~: Substantially all of the Company’s loans, commitments to extend credit, and standby letters of credit have been granted to customers in the Company’s market area (a 50-mile radius of the greater Des Moines, Iowa, metropolitan area and a 30-mile radius of the Iowa City, Iowa, metropolitan area). Securities issued by State and political subdivisions primarily involve governmental entities within the state of Iowa. The concentrations of credit by type of loan are set forth in Note 4. The distribution of commitments to extend credit approximates the distribution of loans outstanding. Standby letters of credit were granted primarily to commercial borrowers.

~~Contingencies~~: In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, any liability resulting from such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.

~~Note 15.~~

~~Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan~~

The Company has an employee savings and stock ownership plan covering substantially all of its employees. The plan consists of two components. One component is an employee stock ownership plan. The other component is a profit sharing plan. Both components have a qualified cash or deferred arrangement under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k). The purpose of the plan is to offer participants a systematic program for the accumulation of retirement and savings income, as well as a means by which to obtain beneficial interest of ownership in Company stock. The stock ownership component of the plan, which is optional, is intended to invest exclusively in common stock of the Company.

The contributions made by the Company to the profit sharing component are determined annually by the Board of Directors. Profit sharing expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 totaled approximately $0, $197, and $308, respectively.

The plan allows eligible employees to defer a portion of their compensation ranging from 1% to the maximum dollar amount allowed by current law. The Company is required to match a portion of the employees’ contributions. The Company’s match is 100% of the first 3% of employee deferrals and 50% of the next 2% of employee deferrals. Forfeitures are used to reduce employer contributions. Expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 totaled approximately $287, $244, and $211, respectively.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the plan held 292,911 and 263,322 shares, respectively, of Company stock. These shares are included in the computation of earnings (loss) per share. Dividends on shares held in the plan may be reinvested in Company stock or paid in cash to the participants, at the election of the participants.

~~Note 16.~~

~~Fair Value Measurements~~

~~Accounting guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures~~, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities using a hierarchy system, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. It clarifies that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts business.

The Company’s balance sheet contains securities available for sale that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value is as follows:

~~Level 1 uses quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.~~

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Level 2 uses observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.~~

~~Level 3 uses unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.~~

When available, quoted market prices are used to determine the fair value of investment securities and such items are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. An example is U.S. Treasury securities. For other securities, the Company determines fair value based on various sources and may apply matrix pricing with observable prices for similar bonds where a price for the identical bond is not observable. Securities measured at fair value by such methods are classified as Level 2. Certain securities are not valued based on observable transactions and are, therefore, classified as Level 3. The fair value of these securities is based on management’s best estimates.

~~The following tables present the balances of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.~~

2009
Description Total
Quoted Prices
in Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)

Assets:
U.S. government agencies and corporations $ 177,890 $ - $ 177,890 $ -
State and political subdivisions 87,935 - 87,935 -
Mortgage-backed securities 64,578 - 64,578 -
Trust preferred securities 2,067 - 931 1,136
Corporate notes and other investments 8,008 - 8,008 -
Total $ 340,478 $ - $ 339,342 $ 1,136

2008
Description Total
Quoted Prices
in Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)

Assets:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies and
corporations
$ 61,050 $ 2,047 $ 59,003 $ -
State and political subdivisions 107,175 - 107,175 -
Mortgage-backed securities 1,234 - 1,234 -
Trust preferred securities 5,269 - 2,944 2,325
Corporate notes and other investments 6,656 - 6,656 -
Total $ 181,384 $ 2,047 $ 177,012 $ 2,325

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~The following table presents changes in securities available for sale with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2009:~~

Securities available for sale: 2009
Beginning balance $ 2,325
Transfer into level 3 250
Total gains or (losses):
Included in earnings (560 )
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) (832 )
Principal payments (47 )
Ending balance $ 1,136

The table above includes one pooled trust preferred security which was transferred to Level 3 during 2008. Market pricing for this security varies widely from one pricing service to another based on a lack of trading so it was considered to no longer have readily observable market data. The fair value as of December 31, 2009, was determined by discounting the expected cash flows over the life of the security. The discount rate included an estimate for illiquidity, credit risk, and the time value of money. Management has the intent to hold the security, so only the credit loss portion of the reduction in fair value was treated as a credit loss during 2009. One other trust preferred security, with a carrying value at the date of transfer of $250, was transferred to Level 3 during 2009. The bank holding c ompany that issued the trust preferred security is not a public company and has serious financial difficulties. Therefore, the value was estimated by management to be zero and OTTI was recognized in earnings for the entire carrying value.

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, they are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The following table presents the assets carried on the balance sheet by caption and level within the valuation hierarchy as of December 31, 2009:

Description Total
Quoted Prices
in Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)

Assets:
Loans $ 19,810 $ - $ - $ 19,810
Other real estate owned 25,350 - - 25,350
Total $ 45,160 $ - $ - $ 45,160

Loans in the table above consist of impaired loans for which a fair value adjustment has been recorded. Impaired loans are evaluated and valued at the time the loan is identified as impaired, at the lower of cost or fair value. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing these loans and are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Collateral may be real estate and/or business assets including equipment, inventory and/or accounts receivable and fair value is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers hired by the Company. Appraised and reported values may be discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation, and/or management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business. ; Other real estate owned in the table above consists of property acquired through foreclosures and settlements of loans. Property acquired is carried at fair value of the property, less estimated disposal costs, and is classified as a Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

GAAP requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis are discussed above. The methodologies for other financial assets and financial liabilities are discussed below:

~~Cash and due from banks: The carrying amount approximates fair value.~~

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Federal funds sold and other short-term investments: The carrying amount approximates fair value.~~

~~Federal Home Loan Bank stock: The fair value of this restricted stock is estimated at its carrying value and redemption price of $100 per share.~~

~~Loans held for sale: The fair values of loans held for sale are based on estimated selling prices.~~

~~Loans~~: The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on observable market interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers with similar credit quality.

~~Deposits~~: The carrying amounts for demand and savings deposits, which represent the amounts payable on demand, approximate their fair values. Fair values for fixed-rate and variable-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on observable market interest rates currently being offered on certificates with similar terms.

~~Accrued interest receivable and payable: The fair values of both accrued interest receivable and payable approximate their carrying amounts.~~

~~Short-term and other borrowings~~: The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and certain other short-term borrowings approximate their fair values. Fair values of FHLB advances and subordinated notes are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on observable market interest rates currently being offered with similar terms.

~~Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit~~: The approximate fair values of commitments and standby letters of credit are based on the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and creditworthiness of the counterparties.

~~The carrying amounts and approximate fair values are as follows as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:~~

2009 2008
Carrying Approximate Carrying Approximate
Amount Fair Value Amount Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks $ 27,923 $ 27,923 $ 23,712 $ 23,712
Federal funds sold and other
short-term investments
103,572 103,572 173,257 173,257
Securities available for sale 340,478 340,478 181,434 181,434
Federal Home Loan Bank stock 10,791 10,791 8,174 8,174
Loans held for sale 332 332 1,018 1,022
Loans, net 1,001,584 1,006,217 1,085,294 1,091,071
Accrued interest receivable 5,502 5,502 6,415 6,415
Financial liabilities:
Deposits 1,246,617 1,250,163 1,154,787 1,160,620
Federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase
40,342 40,342 93,111 93,111
Other short-term borrowings 2,553 2,553 245 245
Accrued interest payable 1,756 1,756 3,995 3,995
Subordinated notes 20,619 14,387 20,619 21,026
FHLB advances 125,000 122,177 125,000 127,053
Off-balance-sheet financial instruments:
Commitments to extend credit - - - -
Standby letters of credit - - - -

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Note 17.~~

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. (Parent Company Only) Condensed Financial Statements~~

Balance Sheets
December 31, 2009 and 2008

2009 2008
Assets
Cash $ 833 $ 686
Investment in securities available for sale 146 183
Investment in West Bank 137,705 143,914
Investment in WB Capital Management Inc. - 12,652
Investment in West Bancorporation Capital Trust I 619 619
Intercompany debentures from West Bank 10,000 10,000
Notes receivable 2,200 -
Other assets 2,663 2,688
Total assets $ 154,166 $ 170,742

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other liabilities $ 488 $ 60
Subordinated notes 20,619 20,619
Total liabilities 21,107 20,679

Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock 34,024 33,548
Common stock 3,000 3,000
Additional paid-in capital 34,387 34,452
Retained earnings 65,959 82,793
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) (4,311 ) (3,730 )
Total stockholders' equity 133,059 150,063
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 154,166 $ 170,742

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

2009 2008 2007
Operating income:
Equity in net income (loss) of West Bank $ (3,753 ) $ 9,084 $ 19,286
Equity in net income (loss) of discontinued operations (9,566 ) 325 568
Equity in net income of West Bancorporation Capital Trust I 44 44 44
Interest and dividend income 719 738 1,166
Securities gains (losses), net - 5 (12 )
Investment securities impairment losses (35 ) (317 ) -
(12,591 ) 9,879 21,052
Operating expenses:
Interest on notes payable - 93 389
Interest on subordinated notes 1,472 1,476 1,472
Salaries and employee benefits 282 232 204
Occupancy 373 216 231
Other 713 917 607
2,840 2,934 2,903
Income (loss) before income taxes (15,431 ) 6,945 18,149
Income taxes (benefits) (814 ) (691 ) (771 )
Net income (loss) $ (14,617 ) $ 7,636 $ 18,920

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

2009 2008 2007
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income (loss) $ (14,617 ) $ 7,636 $ 18,920
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Equity in net (income) loss of West Bank 3,753 (9,084 ) (19,286 )
Equity in net (income) loss of discontinued operations 9,566 (325 ) (568 )
Equity in net income of West Bancorporation Capital Trust I (44 ) (44 ) (44 )
Dividends received from West Bank 3,499 10,200 11,400
Dividends received from West Bancorporation Capital Trust I 44 44 44
Dividends received from WB Capital Management Inc. 1,081 875 1,850
Securities (gains) losses, net - (5 ) 12
Investment securities impairment losses 35 317 -
Amortization 14 14 14
Deferred income taxes (180 ) 114 (66 )
Depreciation 5 - -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in other assets 191 (91 ) (1,054 )
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities 203 (864 ) 902
Net cash provided by operating activities 3,550 8,787 12,124
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale 3 473 935
Purchases of securities available for sale - (468 ) (673 )
Additional capitalization of West Bank - (34,000 ) -
Additional capitalization of WB Capital Management Inc. - - (1,685 )
Repayment of debentures from West Bank - - 10,000
Loan advance (200 ) - -
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (197 ) (33,995 ) 8,577
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Principal payments on long-term borrowing - (3,000 ) (6,000 )
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and common stock warrant - 36,000 -
Payment for shares reacquired and retired under common stock
repurchase plan
- (789 ) (974 )
Common stock dividends paid (1,566 ) (11,138 ) (11,224 )
Preferred stock dividends paid (1,575 ) - -
Preferred stock issuance costs (65 ) - -
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (3,206 ) 21,073 (18,198 )
Net increase (decrease) in cash 147 (4,135 ) 2,503
Cash:
Beginning 686 4,821 2,318
Ending $ 833 $ 686 $ 4,821

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~Note 18.~~

~~Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)~~

2009
Three months ended March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
Interest income $ 16,962 $ 17,271 $ 17,216 $ 16,281
Interest expense 7,025 7,076 6,443 6,092
Net interest income 9,937 10,195 10,773 10,189
Provision for loan losses 3,500 15,000 3,000 3,000
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses 6,437 (4,805 ) 7,773 7,189
Noninterest income 2,973 2,197 2,351 2,111
Investment securities gains (losses), net 38 (275 ) (320 ) (171 )
Noninterest expense 6,094 20,204 5,908 5,699
Income (loss) before income taxes 3,354 (23,087 ) 3,896 3,430
Income taxes (benefits) 417 (9,344 ) 906 665
Income (loss) from continuing operations 2,937 (13,743 ) 2,990 2,765

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes 7 (9,353 ) (1,048 ) 132
Income taxes (benefits) 3 (817 ) 37 81
Income (loss) from discontinued operations 4 (8,536 ) (1,085 ) 51

Net income (loss) 2,941 (22,279 ) 1,905 2,816
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount (567 ) (570 ) (571 ) (568 )
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders $ 2,374 $ (22,849 ) $ 1,334 $ 2,248

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share
from continuing operations
$ 0.14 $ (0.83 ) $ 0.14 $ 0.13
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share
from discontinued operations
$ - $ (0.49 ) $ (0.06 ) $ -
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share $ 0.14 $ (1.32 ) $ 0.08 $ 0.13

~~West Bancorporation, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

2008
Three months ended March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
Interest income $ 18,863 $ 17,330 $ 18,186 $ 18,153
Interest expense 8,987 7,095 7,799 7,550
Net interest income 9,876 10,235 10,387 10,603
Provision for loan losses 5,600 1,000 7,000 3,000
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 4,276 9,235 3,387 7,603
Noninterest income 1,986 2,321 2,346 2,314
Investment securities gains (losses), net 5 - (1,659 ) (3,012 )
Noninterest expense 5,057 5,341 5,271 4,436
Income (loss) before income taxes 1,210 6,215 (1,197 ) 2,469
Income taxes (benefits) (29 ) 1,840 (1,015 ) 590
Income (loss) from continuing operations 1,239 4,375 (182 ) 1,879

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes 233 240 (301 ) 391
Income taxes (benefits) 98 101 (123 ) 162
Income (loss) from discontinued operations 135 139 (178 ) 229

Net income (loss) 1,374 4,514 (360 ) 2,108
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount - - - -
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders $ 1,374 $ 4,514 $ (360 ) $ 2,108

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share
from continuing operations
$ 0.07 $ 0.25 $ (0.01 ) $ 0.11
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share
from discontinued operations
$ 0.01 $ 0.01 $ (0.01 ) $ 0.01
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share $ 0.08 $ 0.26 $ (0.02 ) $ 0.12

~~Note 19.~~

~~Subsequent Events~~

~~Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date financial statements are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Through that date, there were no events requiring disclosure.~~